The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Exclusion from school and recognition of difference
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“School exclusion may also involve unlawful, unclear, or more nefarious reasons such as sending students (in particular special needs students) home or restricting their ability to attend school without official documentation”
From Reconciling Contemporary Approaches to School Attendance and School Absenteeism: Toward Promotion and Nimble Response, Global Policy Review and Implementation, and Future Adaptability (Part 1) (2019) · cites this paper as McCluskey et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Unlawful school exclusion is also vaguely defined, difficult to track, and easily reframed as lawful school exclusion”
From Reconciling Contemporary Approaches to School Attendance and School Absenteeism: Toward Promotion and Nimble Response, Global Policy Review and Implementation, and Future Adaptability (Part 1) (2019) · cites this paper as McCluskey et al., 2016
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 1 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- McCluskey, G., Riddell, S., Weedon, E., & Fordyce, M.
- Venue
- Special Education and Globalisation
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2018-10-16
- Pages
- 41-51
- OpenAlex
- W4238920886
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 6.42
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Inclusive Education and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Issues in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
- Keywords
- school exclusion, school refusal, recognition of difference, social exclusion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
