The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment of lifetime participation in cognitively stimulating activities
Abstract
Age-related dementia and cognitive decline are substantial public health problems that are projected to increase in the first half of this century as the proportion of older persons in the U.S. population increases (Hebert, Scherr, Bienias, Bennett, & Evans, 2003). Loss of cognitive ability in old age is thought to arise from the interaction of experiential and genetic risk factors with multiple age-related pathologic changes in the brain. On post-mortem examination, late life dementia has been associated with the pathology of Alzheimer&s;s disease (i.e., amyloid deposition, neurofibrillary changes), stroke (i.e., cerebral infarction), and Parkinson&s;s disease (i.e., Lewy bodies). These pathologic changes are also seen in the brains of older people who die without dementia, however, albeit to a lesser degree, suggesting that people differ in their capacity to tolerate the deleterious effects of age-related neuropathology. This ability to maintain function despite the accumulation of pathology in the brain is referred to as neural reserve capacity. Factors are thought to influence risk of late life dementia either by affecting the accumulation of neuropathology or by affecting the brain&s;s ability to function in the presence of such pathology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The role of cognitive stimulation on the relations between age and cognitive functioning.
Salthouse, T. A., Berish, D. E., & Miles, J. D. (2002) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.17.4.548 · Cited by 158
Cited by
Hertzog, C., Kramer, A. F., Wilson, R. S., & Lindenberger, U. (2008) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01034.x · Cited by 1,495
Self-citationLoneliness and Risk of Alzheimer Disease
Wilson, R. S., Krueger, K. R., Arnold, S. E., Schneider, J. A., Kelly, J. F., Barnes, L. L., Tang, Y., & Bennett, D. A. (2007) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.64.2.234 · Cited by 1,363
Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project
Bennett, D. A., Buchman, A. S., Boyle, P. A., Barnes, L. L., Wilson, R. S., & Schneider, J. A. (2018) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-179939 · Cited by 1,260
Self-citationThe neuropathology of probable Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment
Schneider, J. A., Arvanitakis, Z., Leurgans, S. E., & Bennett, D. A. (2009) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.21706 · Cited by 935
The bilingual adaptation: How minds accommodate experience
Bialystok, E. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000099 · Cited by 906
Metadata
- Venue
- Cognitive Reserve
- Publisher
- Psychology Press
- Published
- 2013-05-13
- Pages
- 173-186
- OpenAlex
- W4247149713
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 117.21
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of lifetime participation in cognitively stimulating activities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203783047-18
- The paper
- Assessment of lifetime participation in cognitively stimulating activities. (2013). Cognitive Reserve. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783047-18
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.