The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk and the War on Terror
Open accessAbstract
TEST 02 - Elsevier's Scopus, the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature. Search and access research from the science, technology, medicine, social sciences and arts and humanities fields.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Invention of the Passport: Surveillance, Citizenship and the State
Torpey, J. (1999) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511520990 · Cited by 1,005
Governance, risk and dataveillance in the war on terror
Amoore, L., & De Goede, M. (2005) · Crime, Law and Social Change · doi:10.1007/s10611-005-1717-8 · Cited by 273
Cited by
Cowen, D. (2010) · University of Minnesota Press eBooks · doi:10.5749/9781452943183 · Cited by 1,084
The mutual constitution of risk and inequalities: intersectional risk theory
Olofsson, A., Zinn, J. O., Griffin, G., Nygren, K. G., Cebulla, A., & Hannah-Moffat, K. (2014) · Health, Risk & Society · doi:10.1080/13698575.2014.942258 · Cited by 93
Riskscapes and the socio-spatial challenges of climate change
Davies, A., Hooks, G., Knox-Hayes, J., & Liévanos, R. S. (2020) · Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society · doi:10.1093/cjres/rsaa016 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2008-06-11
- OpenAlex
- W108333245
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.26
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk and the War on Terror. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203927700
- The paper
- Risk and the War on Terror. (2008). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203927700
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
