The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in Applied Linguistics
Abstract
Researching multilingually is an umbrella term used (in e.g. Holmes et al. 2013) which seeks to identify and highlight the decision-making researchers engage in regarding language in the many stages of their research processes. In applied linguistics contextualised uses of language are both the object of research and the medium for exploring new research questions. In this chapter we review how applied linguists in distinctive areas such as linguistic ethnography and intercultural communication, amongst others, have highlighted and interrogated the language choices they have made in generating their data, reviewing literature, analysing data, and presenting findings. We conclude with ideas for how researching multilingually can be further opened out for critical discussion in applied linguistics research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 21,166
BRUBAKER, R. (2002) · European Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1017/s0003975602001066 · Cited by 2,627
Clarke, A. (2005) · doi:10.4135/9781412985833 · Cited by 1,555
The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-3059 · Cited by 1,182
Grosfoguel, R. (2011) · TRANSMODERNITY: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World · doi:10.5070/t411000004 · Cited by 1,128
Representing the Colonized: Anthropology's Interlocutors
Said, E. W. (1989) · Critical Inquiry · doi:10.1086/448481 · Cited by 1,032
Unpeeling the Onion: Language Planning and Policy and the ELT Professional
Ricento, T. K., & Hornberger, N. H. (1996) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587691 · Cited by 833
How forests think: toward an anthropology beyond the human
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-2744 · Cited by 762
3 Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide
Sousa Santos, B. D. (2024) · Foundational Concepts of Decolonial and Southern Epistemologies · doi:10.21832/9781800418868-007 · Cited by 741
HORNBERGER, N. H., & JOHNSON, D. C. (2007) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00083.x · Cited by 694
Cited by
Global Englishes and language teaching: A review of pedagogical research
Rose, H., McKinley, J., & Galloway, N. (2021) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444820000518 · Cited by 303
Liu, M., Zhang, L. J., & Biebricher, C. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104977 · Cited by 282
A Meta-analysis of University STEM Summer Bridge Program Effectiveness
Bradford, B. C., Beier, M. E., & Oswald, F. L. (2021) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.20-03-0046 · Cited by 73
Yeung, S. (2025) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101203 · Cited by 70
Zheng, S. (2024) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100271 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2019-12-06
- OpenAlex
- W2971865096
- Cited by
- 572
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 50.69
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780367824471
- The paper
- The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. (2019). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367824471
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.