Cited by 60Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsMethodologies in Health Research and Practice

Qualitative Metasynthesis: A Research Method for Medicine and Health Sciences

Malterud, Kirsti·2019·Routledge eBooks

Abstract

Qualitative Metasynthesis presents a research method developed for upcycling and synthesis of qualitative primary studies, aimed at researchers within medicine and health sciences.This book demonstrates how and why qualitative metasynthesis can be a method for reuse and expansion of medical knowledge. It presents the principles of metasynthesis as a qualitative research method, so that the reader can assess whether this is a research strategy that fits the aim of their study. The author offers practical advice for conducting research using this methodology. The presentation is illustrated by a study carried out by the author and collaborators, reflecting on real-life challenges and solutions as an example of meta-ethnography, one of the most frequently used strategies for qualitative metasynthesis. The author also looks at systematic reviews, a methodology developed within in the tradition of evidence-based medicine, discussing strengths, weaknesses and pitfalls of this methodology. Rooted in the interpretative paradigm, qualitative metasynthesis challenges several of the principles from the evidence-based medicine tradition, offering reflections on challenges when epistemologically very different methodologies intersect.This book should be considered essential reading for anyone carrying out qualitative research within the fields of medicine, health and social care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780429026348

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Line-by-line coding of the results sections was carried out independently by two team members, who first coded two papers independently and compared to assess inter-coder agreement.

    “Following best practice, [53] line-by-line coding of the results sections of eligible papers, which present the empirical data from the studies, was carried out independently by two team members, who first coded two papers independently and compared to assess inter-coder agreement.”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malterud, K.
Corresponding author
Malterud, Kirsti
Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2019-06-05
OpenAlex
W4232882225
Cited by
60
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
7.78
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
Keywords
qualitative meta-synthesis, meta-ethnography, systematic reviews, evidence-based medicine, interpretative paradigm

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review