CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 33Chinese history and philosophyChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and GovernanceKorean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Crisis and Conflict in Han China, 104 BC to AD 9

Loewe, Michael·2018·Routledge eBooks
DOI 10.4324/9780429455568
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This book, first published in 1974, studies the historical development of China during the Western Han dynasty (202 BC-AD 9), a time of great intellectual, religious and political change. The struggle between Reformists and Modernists is analysed using texts contemporary to the time, and this struggle was a key point in Chinese history, leading as it did to enormous change, including to economics and foreign policy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780429455568

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Loewe, M.
Corresponding author
Loewe, Michael
Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2018-10-10
DOI
10.4324/9780429455568
OpenAlex
W2097389856
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.04
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
Keywords
Western Han dynasty, Chinese history, political crisis, intellectual history, religious change, economic change, foreign policy, political conflict

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review