Cited by 5Child Development and Digital TechnologyEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentLiteracy, Media, and Education

When the Technology Disappears

Open access
Plowman, Lydia·2019·Exploring Key Issues in Early Childhood and Technology

Abstract

In spite of the view that young children are more tech savvy and confident and advances have been made in design and usability, children still need guidance and support from others who are more capable. Educators are experts at supporting and facilitating play and learning, but some educators are not as comfortable with providing support for digital play and learning for a variety of reasons. This essay provides links with the concepts of co-viewing, co-use, joint media engagement and media mentors. A distinction between face-to-face (i.e. proximal) support and ways of supporting interaction that are more remote in terms of time and space (i.e. distal) is discussed. The concepts of ‘active presence’ and ‘remote presence’ are considered and connections with the proximal and distal dimensions of guided interaction are described. While support is often provided through spoken language, i.e. the adult engages the child in conversation about what they’re doing, connects it to their experiences and finds ways of extending the learning beyond the screen, an adult’s presence is not always possible, required or desirable. The essay discusses the importance of knowing when to step back as the right thing to do and explores ways of providing support that don’t depend on face-to-face presence or spoken language.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780429457425-6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Computing has become ambient, so the boundary between what is and is not technology is no longer readily apparent.

    “Computing has become ambient, such that the boundaries between what is or what is not technology is no longer readily apparent (Plowman, 2019).”

    From Technologizing Bronfenbrenner: Neo-ecological Theory. (2023) · cites this paper as Plowman, 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 2 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Plowman L. (forthcoming, 2019) Digital toys. To appear in The SAGE Encyclopaedia of Children and Childhood Studies, ed. Daniel Cook. New York: Sage.
  2. Plowman L. (2016) Learning technology at home and preschool. Chapter 6 in Wiley Handbook of Learning Technology, pp.96-112, eds. Nick Rushby and Dan Surry. Chichester, Sussex: John Wiley.
  3. Plowman L., Stephen C. & McPake J. (2010) Growing Up with Technology: Young children learning in a digital world. London: Routledge.
  4. Marsh J., Plowman, L., Yamada-Rice, D., Bishop, J., Lahmar, J. & Scott, F. (2018). Play and creativity in young children's use of apps. British Journal of Educational Technology 49 (5) 870-882.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Plowman, L.
Corresponding author
Plowman, Lydia
Venue
Exploring Key Issues in Early Childhood and Technology
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2019-07-04
Pages
32-36
OpenAlex
W2955848495
Cited by
5
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.71
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
Keywords
digital play, children's technology use, co-viewing, co-use, joint media engagement, remote presence, screen-based learning, early childhood education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review