Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 865

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Racial Formation in the United States

Omi, Michael, Winant, Howard·2018·The Inequality Reader

Abstract

This chapter outlines a theory of race and racism. It explores racial formation as the sociohistorical process by which racial categories are created, inhabited, transformed, and destroyed. The authors elaborate a theory of racial formation in two steps. First, they argue that racial formation is a process of historically situated projects in which human bodies and social structures are represented and organized. Next, they link racial formation to the evolution of hegemony, the way in which society is organized and ruled. To summarize the argument: the theory of racial formation suggests that society is suffused with racial projects, large and small, to which all are subjected. This racial "subjection" is quintessentially ideological. Everybody learns some combination, some version, of the rules of racial classification, and of her own racial identity, often without obvious teaching or conscious inculcation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780429494468-24

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 865

Metadata

Authors
Omi, M., & Winant, H.
Venue
The Inequality Reader
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2018-04-19
Pages
222-227
OpenAlex
W4297972750
Cited by
865
References
0
FWCI
269.63
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Racial Formation in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780429494468-24
The paper
Omi, M., & Winant, H. (2018). Racial Formation in the United States. The Inequality Reader. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494468-24

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.