The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration
Abstract
This chapter examines the question of the necessity or desirability of more effective participation by reviewing the literature in United States public administration and identifies the relevant contemporary issues for both administrators and citizens. It discusses the strategies for overcoming the barriers, and suggests implications for the practice of public administration and citizenship. The chapter organizes around the themes that emerged from the literature review, interviews and focuses on group discussions. It also suggests that how to overcome these barriers in order to move toward more authentic participatory processes. In the context of conventional participation, the administrator controls the ability of the citizen to influence the situation or the process. Both citizens and administrators defined the key elements of authentic participation as focus, commitment, trust, and open and honest discussion. Three categories of barriers were identified in the analyzes: the nature of life in contemporary society, administrative processes and practices and techniques of participation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
Arnstein, S. R. (1969) · Journal of the American Institute of Planners · doi:10.1080/01944366908977225 · Cited by 17,064
Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital
Putnam, R. D. (1995) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.1995.0002 · Cited by 14,037
Cited by
Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort?
Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x · Cited by 1,941
The Challenge of Collaborative Governance
Huxham, C., Vangen, S., Huxham, C., & Eden, C. (2000) · Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory · doi:10.1080/14719030000000021 · Cited by 455
Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2003.00393.x · Cited by 375
Citizen Participation in Budgeting Theory
Ebdon, C., & Franklin, A. L. (2006) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00600.x · Cited by 328
Nabatchi, T. (2010) · The American Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/0275074009356467 · Cited by 321
Metadata
- Authors
- King, C. S., Feltey, K. M., & Susel, B. O.
- Venue
- Democracy, Bureaucracy, and the Study of Administration
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2018-03-09
- Pages
- 301-323
- OpenAlex
- W2157552636
- Cited by
- 613
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 171.15
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780429501036-20
- The paper
- King, C. S., Feltey, K. M., & Susel, B. O. (2018). The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration. Democracy, Bureaucracy, and the Study of Administration. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429501036-20
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.