The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enacting Leadership for Collaborative Advantage: Dilemmas of Ideology and Pragmatism in the Activities of Partnership Managers
Open accessAbstract
Working across organizations has long been recognized as a characteristic of public management, but recent years have seen a worldwide intensification in partnership working. Rhetoric about the benefits is endemic but so are complaints about the difficulty of partnership working in practice. Understanding the way that collaborative approaches may provide value is therefore an essential element of understanding the changing roles of public‐sector organizations. The particular aim of this paper is to contribute to a growing understanding of the way in which individuals enact leadership roles in such situations. The focus is on partnership managers, whose main role is to organize the activities of a collaboration. The way in which partnership managers enact leadership is explored and insight into the kinds of activities that typically occupy them, the types of challenges and dilemmas that they face and typical ways in which they respond to these is provided. We suggest that the main categories of activities split into two opposing perspectives on leadership. We propose an overarching concept which suggests that collaborative leadership involves the management of a tension between ideology and pragmatism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Designing qualitative research
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-1232 · Cited by 9,905
FRENCH, J. R. P., & RAVEN, B. (1986) · Political Leadership · doi:10.2307/jj.12381759.38 · Cited by 4,542
Treating Networks Seriously: Practical and Research-Based Agendas in Public Administration
O'Toole, L. J. (1997) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.2307/976691 · Cited by 1,244
Cultures in Organizations: Three Perspectives
Mumby, D., & Martin, J. (1994) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258841 · Cited by 1,241
Cultures In Organizations: Three Perspectives
Martin, J. (1992) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195071634.001.0001 · Cited by 1,183
Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management
Eden, C., & Ackermann, F. (1998) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446217153 · Cited by 1,123
Process and Structure in Leader-Member Exchange
Sparrowe, R. T., & Liden, R. C. (1997) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259332 · Cited by 1,023
THE DYNAMICS OF COLLECTIVE LEADERSHIP AND STRATEGIC CHANGE IN PLURALISTIC ORGANIZATIONS.
Denis, J.-L., Lamothe, L., & Langley, A. (2001) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069417 · Cited by 953
Beyond Rational Management: Mastering the Paradoxes and Competing Demands of High Performance
Quinn, R. E. (1988) · Cited by 886
Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556343 · Cited by 856
Self-citation
Cited by
Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032 · Cited by 8,256
The Routledge Companion to Leadership
(2016) · doi:10.4324/9781315739854 · Cited by 162
Lencucha, R., Drope, J., & Chavez, J. J. (2015) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czu085 · Cited by 54
The Power of Collaborative Governance: The Case of South Korea Responding to COVID‐19 Pandemic
Choi, Y. J. (2020) · World Medical & Health Policy · doi:10.1002/wmh3.376 · Cited by 49
Interpretive structural modelling of inter-agency collaboration risk in public safety networks
Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek, K. (2022) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-021-01172-0 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Vangen, S., & Huxham, C.
- Venue
- British Journal of Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- s1
- ISSN
- 1045-3172 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8551
- OpenAlex
- W2024017235
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 19.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enacting Leadership for Collaborative Advantage: Dilemmas of Ideology and Pragmatism in the Activities of Partnership Managers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2003.00393.x
- The paper
- Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. (2003). Enacting Leadership for Collaborative Advantage: Dilemmas of Ideology and Pragmatism in the Activities of Partnership Managers. British Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2003.00393.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.