The DOI matches its Crossref record.
From Retelling to Reintegration: Narrative Fixation and the Reconstruction of Meaning
Abstract
Human beings are inveterate meaning-makers, weaving strands of narratives that preserve a sense of continuity, coherence, and connection to centrally important people and principles that anchor their essential life stories. But when these same lives are assaulted by traumatic loss, survivors can become fixated on the horrific story of the dying or the tragic absence of their loved one from their ongoing lives. In such cases, they need professional support with both restorative retelling of the event story of the dying, and restorative reintegration of the backstory of the relationship to the deceased. In this chapter, we offer a framework for orienting to this process, as well as concrete guidelines for both interventions in a way that promotes reprocessing of the loss without re-traumatization, and re-accessing of the relationship as a resource without ruminative preoccupation with it. We conclude with a case vignette that illustrates this focus, suggesting the power of working directly with the presence within absence to the deceased as a vital approach to meaning reconstruction in the wake of loss.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Restorative retelling facilitates the assimilation of the phenomenology of the ayahuasca experience, while helping the person reconstruct their schemas and narratives about themselves, other people and the world, through a process of accommodation.
“Restorative retelling facilitates the assimilation of the phenomenology of the ayahuasca experience, while helping the person reconstruct their schemas and narratives about themselves, other people and the world, through a process of accommodation.”
From Ayahuasca-assisted meaning reconstruction therapy for grief: a non-randomized clinical trial protocol (2025) · cites this paper as [100]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Breen, L. J., Lee, S. A., Mancini, V. O., Willis, M., & Neimeyer, R. A. (2022) · British Journal of Guidance and Counselling · doi:10.1080/03069885.2022.2075540 · Cited by 26
Self-citationGonzález, D., Aixalà, M., Neimeyer, R. A., Cantillo, J., Nicolson, D., & Farré, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.832879 · Cited by 17
Self-citationThe meaning in loss protocol: A clinical trial of online grief therapy
Batista, J., Alves, D., Pires, N., Silva, J. R., Mendes, I., Magalhães, C., Rosa, C., Oliveira, J. T., Gonçalves, M. M., & Neimeyer, R. A. (2025) · Death Studies · doi:10.1080/07481187.2024.2370633 · Cited by 12
Self-citationBottomley, J. S., Smigelsky, M. A., Campbell, K. W., Neimeyer, R. A., & Rheingold, A. A. (2024) · Journal of Loss and Trauma · doi:10.1080/15325024.2024.2357776 · Cited by 6
Self-citationSabucedo, P., Andión, O., Neimeyer, R. A., Soto-Angona, O., Javkin, J., Haro, J. M., Farré, M., & González, D. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1484736 · Cited by 6
Self-citationGrief as a Quest for Meaning: Review of a Research Program
Neimeyer, R. A. (2026) · Journal of Constructivist Psychology · doi:10.1080/10720537.2026.2688401 · Cited by 6
Self-citationLee, S. A., Caycho‐Rodríguez, T., Vilca, L. W., & Neimeyer, R. A. (2024) · Death Studies · doi:10.1080/07481187.2024.2368330 · Cited by 5
Self-citationSoto-Angona, Ó., Andión, Ó., Sabucedo, P., Neimeyer, R. A., Haro, J. M., Javkin, J., Farré, M., & González, D. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-13251-5 · Cited by 4
Self-citationGrief Attack Questionnaire: Instrument construction and initial validation
Lee, S. A., & Neimeyer, R. A. (2025) · Death Studies · doi:10.1080/07481187.2025.2590954 · Cited by 3
Self-citationThe Use of Psychedelics for Grief Following Death due to Advanced Illness: A Scoping Review
Rosenbaum, D., Carter, C., Cirella, B. A., Cho, M., Anderson, M. A., & Hales, S. (2025) · OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying · doi:10.1177/00302228251359366 · Cited by 1
Post-Loss Growth (PLG) in bereavement: The missing link in posttraumatic growth
Malkinson, R., Witztum, E., Neimeyer, R. A., & Rubin, S. S. (2026) · Death Studies · doi:10.1080/07481187.2026.2705378 · Cited by 2
Self-citationOfer, S., & Keisari, S. (2022) · Children · doi:10.3390/children9121805 · Cited by 1
Pandemic Grief and Complications in Bereavement: From Research Evidence to Clinical Relevance
Neimeyer, R. A., Breen, L. J., & Lee, S. A. (2023) · Etudes sur la mort/Études sur la mort · doi:10.3917/eslm.159.0015 · Cited by 1
Self-citationMeaning reconstruction and grief thirteen years after the Roboski massacre: A qualitative study
Ayhan, C. H., Neimeyer, R. A., Tanhan, F., Erdal, N. A., Yağan, F., Öztürk, G. N., BEDİR, G., & Aslangiri, S. (2026) · Death Studies · doi:10.1080/07481187.2026.2626560
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Neimeyer, R. A., & Rynearson, E. (.
- ORCID
- Neimeyer, Robert A.
- Venue
- The Restorative Nature of Ongoing Connections with the Deceased
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2022-03-03
- Pages
- 95-110
- OpenAlex
- W4214942807
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 25.67
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Keywords
- meaning reconstruction, bereavement, traumatic loss, grief, retraumatization, relationship with the deceased, meaning-making, narrative retelling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review