Cited by 44Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social DevelopmentInnovative Human-Technology InteractionDesign Education and Practice

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Routledge International Handbook of Contemporary Participatory Design

Smith, Rachel Charlotte, Loi, Daria, Winschiers-Theophilus, Heike, Huybrechts, Liesbeth, Simonsen, Jesper·2024·Routledge eBooks

Abstract

This handbook offers a comprehensive overview of key themes and agendas in contemporary Participatory Design across diverse disciplines, continents, communities, and practices. Building on Participatory Design’s core values of empowerment and democracy, the handbook explores how the field is developing and diversifying to address contemporary societal challenges in a global community. Participatory Design actively engages peoples, groups and other actors in collaborative design processes to explore and co-create their everyday technologies, practices, and environments. In doing so, Participatory Design aims to address social justice and agency by including diverse actors in the collective shaping of alternative futures. Participatory Design embraces a diverse collection of principles and practices aimed at making technologies, environments, organisations and institutions more responsive to human and planetary needs. In this volume, a multidisciplinary and international group of highly experienced and recognised experts present an authoritative review of the contemporary field and discuss the diverse opportunities and challenges that arise from pivotal issues in Participatory Design, including scaling, collectives, sustainability and more-than-human, decolonisation, emerging technologies and AI, new approaches, methods and engagement beyond academia. The handbook advances contemporary research, theory and practice and highlights case studies that demonstrate how Participatory…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781003334330

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Smith, R. C., Loi, D., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Huybrechts, L., & Simonsen, J.
Affiliations
Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Smith, Rachel Charlotte
Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2024-12-19
OpenAlex
W4405569943
Cited by
44
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 3
FWCI
43.44
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • RUCforsk (Roskilde University) (submittedVersion)
  • Routledge eBooks (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
Keywords
participatory design, empowerment, democracy, co-creation, social justice, agency, scaling, collectives, sustainability, more-than-human, decolonization, emerging technologies, artificial intelligence, inclusive design, societal challenges, alternative futures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review