Cited by 6Innovative Human-Technology InteractionInnovative Approaches in Technology and Social DevelopmentSmart Cities and Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Emerging Technologies and Alternative Futures

Frauenberger, Christopher, Smith, Rachel Charlotte, Loi, Daria, Forlano, Laura, Iversen, Ole Sejer·2024·Routledge International Handbook of Contemporary Participatory Design

Abstract

Participatory Design’s core ambition is to democratise technological innovation to bring about alternative futures, underpinned by its strong value propositions of empowerment, social justice, and socio-ecological sustainability. As such, Participatory Design has always sought to engage with novel and emerging technologies within shifting societal challenges, continuously evolving its theory and practice to have an impact to this effect. This chapter provides a review of contemporary discourses between Participatory Design and current emerging technologies and develops stepping stones for future research and practice in the field. The chapter investigates the qualities of emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI), large-language models, and immersive media and how these are configured in ways that produce systems of old and new forms of oppression. The qualities identified relate to their scale, hyper-connectedness, and pervasiveness but also their increasing agential capabilities. Configured within the conditions of destabilised democracies, increasing social injustice, an out-of-bounds surveillance capitalism, and the climate emergency, we argue that Participatory Design needs to develop meaningful and effective participation around these socio-material assemblages to offer alternatives. The chapter surveys examples of Participatory Design’s engagement with such systems and technologies over the past decade, covering themes of platforms, civic technologies…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781003334330-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Frauenberger, C., Smith, R. C., Loi, D., Forlano, L., & Iversen, O. S.
Affiliations
Aarhus University (DK)
Venue
Routledge International Handbook of Contemporary Participatory Design
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2024-12-19
Pages
139-164
OpenAlex
W4405569932
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1
FWCI
7.41
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Routledge eBooks (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Smart Cities and Technologies
Keywords
participatory design, emerging technologies, alternative futures, artificial intelligence, large language models, immersive media, surveillance capitalism, social justice, socio-ecological sustainability, material participation, platforms, civic technology, automation, climate crisis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review