The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Emerging Technologies and Alternative Futures
Abstract
Participatory Design’s core ambition is to democratise technological innovation to bring about alternative futures, underpinned by its strong value propositions of empowerment, social justice, and socio-ecological sustainability. As such, Participatory Design has always sought to engage with novel and emerging technologies within shifting societal challenges, continuously evolving its theory and practice to have an impact to this effect. This chapter provides a review of contemporary discourses between Participatory Design and current emerging technologies and develops stepping stones for future research and practice in the field. The chapter investigates the qualities of emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI), large-language models, and immersive media and how these are configured in ways that produce systems of old and new forms of oppression. The qualities identified relate to their scale, hyper-connectedness, and pervasiveness but also their increasing agential capabilities. Configured within the conditions of destabilised democracies, increasing social injustice, an out-of-bounds surveillance capitalism, and the climate emergency, we argue that Participatory Design needs to develop meaningful and effective participation around these socio-material assemblages to offer alternatives. The chapter surveys examples of Participatory Design’s engagement with such systems and technologies over the past decade, covering themes of platforms, civic technologies…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Critical scholars highlight that RAI frameworks often reflect Western-centric values, overlooking the specific needs and cultural contexts of the Global South.
“However, critical scholars highlight that these frameworks often reflect Western-centric values, overlooking the specific needs and cultural contexts of the Global South [1, 3, 10, 16].”
From Designing Responsible AI with Indigenous Communities: Towards Participatory AI with ovaHimba and San People in Namibia (2026) · cites this paper as [16]
Participatory design emphasises collaboration, co-creation and co-existence by involving community members throughout the development and design process.
“Unlike traditional, top-down approaches, participatory design emphasises collaboration, co-creation and co-existence by involving community members throughout the development and design process [16, 62, 78].”
From Designing Responsible AI with Indigenous Communities: Towards Participatory AI with ovaHimba and San People in Namibia (2026) · cites this paper as [16]
Participatory design has been slow in its direct engagement with AI.
“Although participatory design has been slow in its direct engagement with AI, the focus on democratic technology design and computational empowerment at the community and policy levels has great potential to develop sustainable and decolonial approaches to AI in local global south environments [10, 16, 63].”
From Designing Responsible AI with Indigenous Communities: Towards Participatory AI with ovaHimba and San People in Namibia (2026) · cites this paper as [16]
Other authors call for the enhanced use of participatory approaches to AI and automated systems, increasingly entangled in our everyday lives.
“In line with this, other authors call for the enhanced use of participatory approaches to AI and automated systems, increasingly entangled in our everyday lives [3, 10, 16].”
From Designing Responsible AI with Indigenous Communities: Towards Participatory AI with ovaHimba and San People in Namibia (2026) · cites this paper as [16]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Indongo, N. N., Smith, R. C., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Kandjengo, S., & Mbinge, U. (2026) · Proceedings of the 19th Participatory Design Conference 2026, Vol. 1: Full Papers · doi:10.1145/3796624.3796667 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Frauenberger, C., Smith, R. C., Loi, D., Forlano, L., & Iversen, O. S.
- Affiliations
- Aarhus University (DK)
- Venue
- Routledge International Handbook of Contemporary Participatory Design
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2024-12-19
- Pages
- 139-164
- OpenAlex
- W4405569932
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 7.41
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Routledge eBooks (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Smart Cities and Technologies
- Keywords
- participatory design, emerging technologies, alternative futures, artificial intelligence, large language models, immersive media, surveillance capitalism, social justice, socio-ecological sustainability, material participation, platforms, civic technology, automation, climate crisis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review