The Danielson Framework for Teacher Evaluation and Student Assessment
Abstract
Empathy and care, rooted in aesthetics, are important dispositions to be enacted and taught in all classrooms, but especially in art. Engrossment, the cognitive effort to gain information, informs and builds empathy. Both allow students to gain knowledge, take on other perspectives, and revise their understanding of the world enhancing the meaning of their artwork. Art educators must prioritize social-emotional learning, empathy, engrossment, and care in meaningful ways. In addition to explicit teaching, modeling's educative role cannot be ignored. It can also be observed for evaluation purposes. The Danielson Framework speaks to engrossment, empathy, and care when assessing for respect and rapport between teachers and students. However, their existing expectations, knowing student names and making small talk about extracurriculars, do not capture the high level of authentic empathetic engagement that many art educators practice. Two exemplary teachers' engrossed practices and effects on student learning will be shared as unique examples. Perceiving and being able to articulate this exceptional level of respect and rapport, often inherent to the art education classroom due to engrossment, care, and empathy's connection to aesthetics, is important for the assessment of secondary art educators' teaching practice and as advocacy for the field.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Preparing Future Educators for the Digital Shift
Green, W. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-9494-7.ch004
- Authors
- Goss, S.
- Corresponding author
- Goss, Samantha
- ORCID
- Goss, Samantha
- Venue
- Authentic Secondary Art Assessment
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2023-07-31
- Pages
- 69-72
- OpenAlex
- W4385426860
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 8.95
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art Education and Development
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Keywords
- teacher evaluation, student assessment, empathy, care, engrossment, social-emotional learning, art education, teacher-student rapport, aesthetics, teacher advocacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review