Commentary Section V
Abstract
Guiding students to develop care for materials, care of self, and care of others is an important learning outcome for many art educators. Art educators can aspire to foster imaginative skill of empathy. Empathy is a recognition of our connections to both the human and inhuman worlds. We make sense of these interactions before we can express our feelings in words. Art allows students to reflect on felt relationships before they have language to express it. Reflection on tacit knowledge can develop an art of living . Teacher assessment of student empathy is a form of engrossment with student learning. Nel Noddings describes engrossment as a dedicated and authentic commitment to knowing another person. The Danielson Framework—a tool for assessing teacher quality—values teacher rapport with students. Art teacher engrossment with students that stems from authentic assessments for learning exceeds the Danielson Framework's expectations for teacher engagement. By going beyond the Danielson rubric, the extraordinary work art teachers perform through student assessment could possibly be recognized.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Still being checked.
- Authors
- Goss, S., & Siegesmund, R.
- Venue
- Authentic Secondary Art Assessment
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2023-07-31
- Pages
- 165-170
- OpenAlex
- W4385427678
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art Education and Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
- Keywords
- empathy, art education, student assessment, engrossment, Nel Noddings, teacher assessment, tacit knowledge, art of living, teacher-student rapport, authentic assessment, caring pedagogy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review