The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phonological Processes in Literacy
Abstract
Contents: Preface. Part I: Introduction. J. Morais, Constraints on the Development of Phonemic Awareness. B.A. Blachman, Phonological Awareness: Implications for Prereading and Early Reading Instruction. L. Bradley, P. Bryant, Phonological Skills Before and After Learning to Read. I. Lundberg, Phonemic Awareness Can Be Developed Without Reading Instruction. V.A. Mann, Are We Taking Too Narrow a View of the Conditions for Development of Phonological Awareness? Part II: Introduction. R. Treiman, A. Zukowski, Levels of Phonological Awareness. J.F. Carlisle, Questioning the Psychological Reality of Onset-Rime as a Level of Phonological Awareness. A.E. Fowler, How Early Phonological Development Might Set the Stage for Phoneme Awareness. C. Read, Access to Syllable Structure in Language and Learning. Part III: Introduction. S.A. Brady, The Role of Working Memory in Reading Disability. V.L. Hanson, Phonological Processing Without Sound. I.G. Mattingly, Modularity, Working Memory, and Reading Disability. B.F. Pennington, G. Van Orden, D. Kirson, M. Haith, What Is the Causal Relation Between Verbal STM Problems and Dyslexia? J.K. Torgesen, Cross-Age Consistency in Phonological Processing. Part IV: Introduction. P.B. Gough, M.A. Walsh, Chinese, Phoenicians, and the Orthographic Cipher of English. C.A. Perfetti, On the Value of Simple Ideas in Reading Instruction. K.E. Stanovich, R.F. West, A.E. Cunningham, Beyond Phonological Processes: Print Exposure and Orthographic Processing. F.R. Vellutino, D.M. Scanlon, The Preeminence of Phonologically Based Skills in Learning to Read.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3 · Cited by 2,871
Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisition
Share, D. L. (1995) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2 · Cited by 2,352
Share, D. L. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584 · Cited by 1,022
Longitudinal Studies of Phonological Processing and Reading
Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/002221949402700503 · Cited by 932
Functional disruption in the organization of the brain for reading in dyslexia
Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Pugh, K. R., Fulbright, R. K., Constable, R. T., Mencl, W. E., Shankweiler, D. P., Liberman, A. M., Skudlarski, P., Fletcher, J. M., et al. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.5.2636 · Cited by 872
Metadata
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2013-09-13
- OpenAlex
- W1756630782
- Cited by
- 736
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.08
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phonological Processes in Literacy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315044439
- The paper
- Phonological Processes in Literacy. (2013). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315044439
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.