Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 219

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cognitive Science Foundations of Instruction

·2020·Routledge eBooks

Abstract

Contents: Preface. J.W. Thomas, W.D. Rohwer,Jr., Proficient Autonomous Learning: Problems and Prospects. The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt, Toward Integrated Curricula: Possibilities From Anchored Instruction. D. Cervone, The Role of Self-Referent Cognitions in Goal Setting, Motivation, and Performance. B. Means, Cognitive Task Analysis as a Basis for Instructional Design. G. Gabrys, A. Weiner, A. Lesgold, Learning by Problem Solving in a Coached Apprenticeship System. A.C. Graesser, N.K. Person, J. Huber, Question Asking During Tutoring and in the Design of Educational Software. S.J. Ceci, A.I. Ruiz, Inserting Context into our Thinking About Thinking: Implications for a Theory of Everyday Intelligent Behavior. A. Elstein, M. Rabinowitz, Medical Cognition: Research and Evaluation. G.A. Klein, R.R. Hoffman, Seeing the Invisible: Perceptual-Cognitive Aspects of Expertise.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315044712

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 219

Metadata

Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2020-02-13
OpenAlex
W602663473
Cited by
219
References
0
FWCI
4.72
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive Science Foundations of Instruction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315044712
The paper
Cognitive Science Foundations of Instruction. (2020). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315044712

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.