The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality and Dependency
Abstract
This new edition of Eva Feder Kittay’s feminist classic, Love’s Labor, explores how theories of justice and morality must be reconfigured when intersecting with care and dependency, and the failure of policy towards women who engage in care work. The work is hailed as a major contribution to the development of an ethics of care. Where society is viewed as an association of equal and autonomous persons, the work of caring for dependents figures neither in political theory nor in social policy. While some women have made many gains, equality continues to elude many others, as in large measure, social institutions fail to take into account the dependency of childhood, illness, disability and frail old age and fail to adequately support those who care for dependents. Using a narrative of her experiences caring for her disabled daughter, Eva Feder Kittay discusses the relevance of her analysis of dependency to significant cognitive disability. She explores the significance of dependency work by analyzing John Rawls' influential liberal theory and two examples of public policy—welfare reform and family leave—to show how theory and policy fail women when they miss the centrality of dependency to issues of justice. This second edition has updated material on care workers, her adult disabled daughter and key changes in welfare reform. Using a mix of personal reflection and political argument, this new edition of a classic text will continue to be an innovative and influential contribution to the debate on searching for greater equality and justice for women. Love’s Labor has spoken to audiences around the world and has had an impact on readers from many countries and in many disciplines: philosophy, sociology, disability studies, nursing. It has been required and supplementary reading on many undergraduate courses on Ethics, Feminist Ethics, Gender and Religious Ethics, Political Theory, Bioethics and Disability Studies. It has been translated into Italian, Japanese and Korean.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
CAPABILITIES AS FUNDAMENTAL ENTITLEMENTS: SEN AND SOCIAL JUSTICE
Nussbaum, M. (2003) · Feminist Economics · doi:10.1080/1354570022000077926 · Cited by 2,504
Caring Masculinities: Theorizing an Emerging Concept
Elliott, K. (2016) · Men and Masculinities · doi:10.1177/1097184x15576203 · Cited by 695
Neo-Liberalism and Marketisation: The Implications for Higher Education
Lynch, K. (2006) · European Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2304/eerj.2006.5.1.1 · Cited by 599
Making time for soil: Technoscientific futurity and the pace of care
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2015) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312715599851 · Cited by 512
Self, Society, and the "New Gerontology"
Holstein, M. B., & Minkler, M. (2003) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/43.6.787 · Cited by 503
Metadata
- Authors
- Kittay, E. F.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2019-12-06
- OpenAlex
- W814872039
- Cited by
- 919
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 43.18
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality and Dependency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315108926
- The paper
- Kittay, E. F. (2019). Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality and Dependency. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315108926
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.