Cited by 196Student Assessment and FeedbackEvaluation of Teaching PracticesHigher Education Teaching and Evaluation

Developing Evaluative Judgement in Higher Education: Assessment for Knowing and Producing Quality Work

·2018·Routledge eBooks

Abstract

By placing evaluative judgement on the agenda for curriculum reform in higher education, this book points to an underdeveloped, but potentially highly fruitful, direction for adding value to current courses.The "capability to make decisions about the quality of work of self and others" (Ajjawi et al. [Chapter 1, this volume]) is already implicit as an outcome to be developed in university courses, but many of the preceding chapters have argued that it should be actively pursued, rather than taken for granted that it will occur.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315109251

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Assessment co-creation provides an opportunity for students and teachers to lessen the negative impact of misalignment between differing assessment expectations.

    “Furthermore, assessment co-creation provides an opportunity for students and teachers to lessen the negative impact of misalignment between differing assessment expectations (Boud et al., 2018).”

    From Assessment design through co-creation (2025) · cites this paper as Boud et al., 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2018-04-19
OpenAlex
W4290699975
Cited by
110
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3
FWCI
13.56
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Teaching and Evaluation
Keywords
evaluative judgments, higher education curriculum reform, quality of work, decision-making skills, course design, learning outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review