The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental Valuation under Sustainable Development
Abstract
Environmentalism has evolved since the 1960&s;s from a concern with the preservation of wilderness in the American experience to a concern over pollution of human habitat throughout the industrialized world. Reasoning from a partial-equilibrium framework, economists have argued that environmental valuation and the incorporation of such values in decision-making is a way of caring for future generations. The principle of sustainable development—that needs are to be met as fully as possible while ensuring that the life opportunities of future generations are undiminished relative to the present—is widely accepted. The environmental-valuation literature addressed the interests of future generations through its early association with questions of wilderness preservation. The relationships between social goals and valuation identified by the general-equilibrium framework, however, indicate serious conceptual inadequacies in the analyses to date of global issues such as climate change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
To Slow or Not to Slow: The Economics of The Greenhouse Effect
Nordhaus, W. D. (1991) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2233864 · Cited by 1,523
The Social Rate of Discount and The Optimal Rate of Investment
Marglin, S. A. (1963) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1879374 · Cited by 656
The Economics of Natural Environments: Studies in the Valuation of Commodity and Amenity Resources
Bishop, R. C., Kelso, M. M., Krutilla, J. V., & Fisher, A. C. (1976) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3145200 · Cited by 208
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Howarth, Richard B. , (1991a) “Intergenerational Competitive Equilibria Under Technological Uncertainty and an Exhaustible Resource Constraint,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, November 1991, 21, 225–243. · doi:10.1016/0095-0696(91)90028-h
Cited by
Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review
Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2021) · Review of Accounting Studies · doi:10.1007/s11142-021-09609-5 · Cited by 1,923
“From a societal perspective, CSR and sustainability are about externalities and the distribution of rights and assets across generations (e.g., Howarth and Norgaard 1992).”
BackgroundA critical review of reductionist approaches for assessing the progress towards sustainability
Gasparatos, A., El-Haram, M., & Horner, M. (2008) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2007.09.002 · Cited by 416
“Measuring Sustainability”: A Multi-Criterion Framework
Munda, G. (2005) · Environment, Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-003-4713-0 · Cited by 358
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Sustainable Development
Munda, G. (2006) · International Series in Operations Research & Management Science · doi:10.1007/0-387-23081-5_23 · Cited by 272
Economic Analysis of Widespread Adoption of CSR and Sustainability Reporting Standards
Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3315673 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Howarth, R. B., & Norgaard*, R. B.
- Venue
- The Economics of Sustainability
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2017-09-08
- Pages
- 193-197
- OpenAlex
- W1524605720
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 90.55
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental Valuation under Sustainable Development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315240084-13
- The paper
- Howarth, R. B., & Norgaard*, R. B. (2017). Environmental Valuation under Sustainable Development. The Economics of Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315240084-13
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.