Handbook of Distance Education
Abstract
Contents: Preface. The Handbook in Brief: An Overview. Part I: Historical and Conceptual Foundations. L.M. Black, A History of Scholarship. C. Feasley, E.L. Bunker, A History of National and Regional Organizations and the ICDE. Y. Lee, M.P. Driscoll, D.W. Nelson, Trends in Research: A Content Analysis of Major Journals. F. Saba, A Systems Approach in Theory Building. O. Peters, The Most Industrialized Form of Education. B. Holmberg, A Theory of Teaching-Learning Conversations. D.R. Garrison, W. Archer, A Theory of Community of Inquiry. M.G. Moore, The Theory of Transactional Distance. Part II: Learners, Learning, and Learner Support. B. Anderson, Independent Learning. M.J. Hannafin, J.R. Hill, L. Song, R. West, Cognitive Perspectives on Technology-Enhanced Distance Learning Environments. K. Carabajal, D. LaPointe, C.N. Gunawardena, Group Development in Online Distance Learning Groups. M. Allen, N. Burrell, J. Bourhis, E. Timmerman, Literature of Satisfaction. C. Cavanaugh, Student Achievement in Elementary and High School. C. Kramarae, Gender Matters in Online Learning. R.F. Curry, Academic Advising in Degree Programs. S. Kinash, S. Crichton, Supporting the Disabled Student. S.H. Dew, The Role of Academic Libraries. Part III: Design and Teaching. R. Shearer, Instructional Design and the Technologies: An Overview. C.J. Bonk, V.P. Dennen, Frameworks for Design and Instruction. S. Naidu, Instructional Design for Optimal Learning. P. Sharma, K.M. Oliver, M.J. Hannafin, Teaching a…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Asynchronous group settings contribute to social loafing through barriers to cohesion and engagement.
“This study builds on Moore's (2018) transactional distance model: how asynchronous group settings contribute to social loafing through barriers to cohesion and engagement.”
From Exploring the experiences of social loafing in group work among online psychology students (2025) · cites this paper as Moore's (2018)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics
Song, L., Singleton, E. S., Hill, J. R., & Koh, M. H. (2004) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2003.11.003 · Cited by 1,132 · see citing works
The current state and impact of Covid‐19 on digital higher education in Germany
Zawacki‐Richter, O. (2021) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1002/hbe2.238 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Rogers, P. C., Graham, C. R., & Mayes, C. T. (2007) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-007-9033-x · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Lou, Y., Bernard, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2006) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-006-8252-x · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Al-Harthi, A. S. (2006) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v6i3.263 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Exploring the experiences of social loafing in group work among online psychology students
Puccini, O., & Newell, S. (2025) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/dqvkp589 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Predicting Student Success in College Algebra Classes Using Machine Learning
Akcay Ozkan, Z., Yu, Y., & Stelmach, E. (2024) · 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings · doi:10.18260/1-2--43933
- Authors
- Moore, M. G., & Diehl, W. C.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Michael Grahame Moore
- ORCID
- William C. Diehl
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2018-12-07
- OpenAlex
- W1530279415
- Cited by
- 795
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 48
- FWCI
- 47.88
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
- Keywords
- distance education, online learning, history of distance education, community of inquiry, transactional distance, self-directed learning, student support, instructional design, learning objects, collaborative interaction, academic advising, students with disabilities, academic libraries, institutional policy, distance education administration, student satisfaction, academic performance, technology-enhanced learning environments, negotiation of meaning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
