Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,483

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Doing Qualitative Research

·2017·Qualitative Research Methods for Media Studies

Abstract

This chapter focuses on general aspects of the qualitative research process. Language is a fundamental aspect of all qualitative research. At a basic level, qualitative research strives to understand the traditions, contexts, usages and meanings of words, concepts and ideas. Qualitative researchers ask research questions, search for meaning, look for useful ways to talk about experiences within a specific historical, cultural, economic and/or political context, and consider the research process within relevant social practices. The qualitative research process often consists of five distinct phases: choosing a topic of study; constructing a research question and picking a method of analysis based on an interpretive paradigm or theoretical framework; gathering evidence; analyzing and interpreting evidence; and crafting a research report. In contemporary digital society, researchers have access to a variety of big data sets that offer them a wealth of information on media-related topics. Using big data sets may certainly provide researchers with valuable information on economic, political and/or social issues.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315435978-2

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,483

Metadata

Venue
Qualitative Research Methods for Media Studies
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2017-06-26
Pages
13-26
OpenAlex
W2805015122
Cited by
1,483
References
0
FWCI
222.20
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Doing Qualitative Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315435978-2
The paper
Doing Qualitative Research. (2017). Qualitative Research Methods for Media Studies. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315435978-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.