The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Doing Qualitative Research
Abstract
This chapter focuses on general aspects of the qualitative research process. Language is a fundamental aspect of all qualitative research. At a basic level, qualitative research strives to understand the traditions, contexts, usages and meanings of words, concepts and ideas. Qualitative researchers ask research questions, search for meaning, look for useful ways to talk about experiences within a specific historical, cultural, economic and/or political context, and consider the research process within relevant social practices. The qualitative research process often consists of five distinct phases: choosing a topic of study; constructing a research question and picking a method of analysis based on an interpretive paradigm or theoretical framework; gathering evidence; analyzing and interpreting evidence; and crafting a research report. In contemporary digital society, researchers have access to a variety of big data sets that offer them a wealth of information on media-related topics. Using big data sets may certainly provide researchers with valuable information on economic, political and/or social issues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/160940690600500107 · Cited by 11,829
Understanding and Evaluating Qualitative Research
Fossey, E., Harvey, C., Mcdermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x · Cited by 2,311
DeCuir-Gunby, J. T., Marshall, P. L., & McCulloch, A. W. (2011) · Field Methods · doi:10.1177/1525822x10388468 · Cited by 1,456
Qualitative and Mixed Methods Provide Unique Contributions to Outcomes Research
Curry, L. A., Nembhard, I. M., & Bradley, E. H. (2009) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.742775 · Cited by 1,085
Types of Unintended Consequences Related to Computerized Provider Order Entry
Campbell, E. M., Sittig, D. F., Ash, J. S., Guappone, K. P., & Dykstra, R. H. (2006) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m2042 · Cited by 823
Metadata
- Venue
- Qualitative Research Methods for Media Studies
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2017-06-26
- Pages
- 13-26
- OpenAlex
- W2805015122
- Cited by
- 1,483
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 222.20
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Doing Qualitative Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315435978-2
- The paper
- Doing Qualitative Research. (2017). Qualitative Research Methods for Media Studies. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315435978-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.