Cited by 7

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Identity and Membership

Van De Mieroop, Dorien·2017·The Routledge Handbook of Pragmatics

Abstract

Researchers studying identity belong to a wide diversity of disciplines, ranging from anthropology, psychology, sociology, history and literature through to linguistics. Within the latter field, identity is studied by discourse analysts, interactional sociolinguists, conversation analysts and discursive psychologists. Identity is often also explicitly related to membership, as the following definition by Kroskrity illustrates. Social identity theory also recognises that though each individual is a member of a number of different social groups, these may differ in salience. Approaches to identity, such as discourse analysis, conversation analysis, discursive psychology and interactional sociolinguistics, tend to focus on naturally occurring oral data that are recorded and then transcribed. This chapter selects one interview with a thirty-three-year-old secondary schoolteacher (IE) who obtained a master's degree in French and Spanish. It discusses an excerpt from the interview in which the interviewer (IR) probes for situations in which the interviewee was the victim of racism.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315668925-16

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 7

Metadata

Authors
Van De Mieroop, D.
Venue
The Routledge Handbook of Pragmatics
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2017-01-20
Pages
184-196
Cited by
7
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identity and Membership. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315668925-16
The paper
Van De Mieroop, D. (2017). Identity and Membership. The Routledge Handbook of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315668925-16