The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
Green Gentrification
Abstract
Green Gentrification looks at the social consequences of urban "greening" from an environmental justice and sustainable development perspective. Through a comparative examination of five cases of urban greening in Brooklyn, New York, it demonstrates that such initiatives, while positive for the environment, tend to increase inequality and thus undermine the social pillar of sustainable development. Although greening is ostensibly intended to improve environmental conditions in neighborhoods, it generates green gentrification that pushes out the working-class, and people of color, and attracts white, wealthier in-migrants. Simply put, urban greening "richens and whitens," remaking the city for the sustainability class. Without equity-oriented public policy intervention, urban greening is negatively redistributive in global cities. This book argues that environmental injustice outcomes are not inevitable. Early public policy interventions aimed at neighborhood stabilization can create more just sustainability outcomes. It highlights the negative social consequences of green growth coalition efforts to green the global city, and suggests policy choices to address them. The book applies the lessons learned from green gentrification in Brooklyn to urban greening initiatives globally. It offers comparison with other greening global cities. This is a timely and original book for all those studying environmental justice, urban planning, environmental sociology, and sustainable develo…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“According to Gould and Lewis (2016), neighborhoods with solid community organizations experience less displacement in green gentrification.”
From Design for Climate Change in the Neoliberal Present: Gentrification, Ecocide, and the Loss of Urbanity in New York City (2022) · cites this paper as Gould and Lewis 2016
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nature Contact and Human Health: A Research Agenda
Frumkin, H., Bratman, G. N., Breslow, S. J., Cochran, B., Kahn Jr, P. H., Lawler, J. J., Levin, P. S., Tandon, P. S., Varanasi, U., Wolf, K. L., et al. (2017) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp1663 · Cited by 1,237
Haase, D., Kabisch, S., Haase, A., Andersson, E., Banzhaf, E., Baró, F., Brenck, M., Fischer, L. K., Frantzeskaki, N., Kabisch, N., et al. (2017) · Habitat International · doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.04.005 · Cited by 592
Climate gentrification: from theory to empiricism in Miami-Dade County, Florida
Keenan, J. M., Hill, T., & Gumber, A. (2018) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aabb32 · Cited by 351
Why green “climate gentrification” threatens poor and vulnerable populations
Anguelovski, I., Connolly, J. J. T., Pearsall, H., Shokry, G., Checker, M., Maantay, J., Gould, K., Lewis, T., Maroko, A., & Roberts, J. T. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1920490117 · Cited by 340
Self-citationRigolon, A., & Németh, J. (2018) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2018.03.016 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Gould, K., & Lewis, T.
- Affiliations
- City University of New York (US)
- Venue
- Sage eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2016-07-15
- OpenAlex
- W4242381599
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 57 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sage eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Planning and Governance
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Green Space and Health
- Keywords
- green gentrification, urban greening, environmental justice, sustainable development, social inequality, neighborhood displacement, working-class residents, people of color, global cities, Brooklyn
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Green Gentrification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315687322
- The paper
- Gould, K., & Lewis, T. (2016). Green Gentrification. Sage eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315687322