The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Single-Case Research Designs
Abstract
The first broad categorization of all cases was suggested by Robert Stake in 1994 and is based on the scale of the case study. He concluded that cases can be grouped into three categories or types of studies based on the intent of their research design: intrinsic, instrumental, and collective. Intrinsic case studies are the most narrow in scale, whereas collective studies have the greatest scale.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Single-Case Intervention Research Design Standards
Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J. H., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2013) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/0741932512452794 · Cited by 1,331
Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method
Michie, S., Fixsen, D., Grimshaw, J. M., & Eccles, M. P. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-40 · Cited by 976
Single-case experimental designs: a systematic review of published research and current standards
Smith, J. D. (2012) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0029312 · Cited by 630
Hayes, A. M., Laurenceau, J.-P., Feldman, G., Strauss, J. L., & Cardaciotto, L. (2007) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2007.01.008 · Cited by 508
Vlaeyen, J. W. S., de Jong, J., Geilen, M., Heuts, P. H. T. G., & van Breukelen, G. (2002) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/00002508-200207000-00006 · Cited by 499
Metadata
- Venue
- Case Research in Public Management
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2014-12-18
- Pages
- 63-76
- OpenAlex
- W645844968
- Cited by
- 766
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 113.67
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Single-Case Research Designs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315705941-10
- The paper
- Single-Case Research Designs. (2014). Case Research in Public Management. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315705941-10
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
