Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 202

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Factor Analysis

Bandalos, Deborah L., Finney, Sara J.·2018·The Reviewer’s Guide to Quantitative Methods in the Social Sciences

Abstract

Factor analysis is a method of modeling the covariation among a set of observed variables as a function of one or more latent constructs. Here, we use the term construct to refer to an unobservable but theoretically defensible entity, such as intelligence, self-efficacy, or creativity. Such constructs are typically considered to be latent in the sense that they are not directly observable (see Bollen, 2002 , for a more detailed discussion of latent constructs). The purpose of factor analysis is to assist researchers in identifying and/or understanding the nature of the latent constructs underlying the variables of interest. Technically, these descriptions exclude component analysis , which is a method for reducing the dimensionality of a set of observed variables through the creation of an optimum number of weighted composites. A major difference between factor and component analysis is that in the latter all of the variance is analyzed, whereas in factor analysis, only the shared (common) variance is analyzed. For this reason, factor analysis is sometimes referred to as common factor analysis . In many ways, however, component analysis is very similar to common factor analysis, and many of the desiderata for exploratory factor analysis presented here apply equally to component analysis. Given that the goal of component analysis is to explain as much observed variance as possible via the weighted composites and not, as in common factor analysis, to model the relations among v…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315755649-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J.
Venue
The Reviewer’s Guide to Quantitative Methods in the Social Sciences
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2018-11-15
Pages
98-122
Cited by
202
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.