The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factor Analysis
Abstract
Factor analysis is a method of modeling the covariation among a set of observed variables as a function of one or more latent constructs. Here, we use the term construct to refer to an unobservable but theoretically defensible entity, such as intelligence, self-efficacy, or creativity. Such constructs are typically considered to be latent in the sense that they are not directly observable (see Bollen, 2002 , for a more detailed discussion of latent constructs). The purpose of factor analysis is to assist researchers in identifying and/or understanding the nature of the latent constructs underlying the variables of interest. Technically, these descriptions exclude component analysis , which is a method for reducing the dimensionality of a set of observed variables through the creation of an optimum number of weighted composites. A major difference between factor and component analysis is that in the latter all of the variance is analyzed, whereas in factor analysis, only the shared (common) variance is analyzed. For this reason, factor analysis is sometimes referred to as common factor analysis . In many ways, however, component analysis is very similar to common factor analysis, and many of the desiderata for exploratory factor analysis presented here apply equally to component analysis. Given that the goal of component analysis is to explain as much observed variance as possible via the weighted composites and not, as in common factor analysis, to model the relations among v…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“When there could be many (sub-)factors in a dimension, prior research suggested relaxing the measurement part of the model using CFA (Asparouhov & Muthén, 2014;Bandalos & Finney, 2018).”
From Design and validation of the AI literacy questionnaire: The affective, behavioural, cognitive and ethical approach (2024) · cites this paper as Bandalos & Finney, 2018
Citations
Cites
A Simulation Study of Factor Score Indeterminacy
Acito, F., & Anderson, R. D. (1986) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378602300203 · Cited by 46
Cited by
Ng, D. T. K., Wu, W., Leung, J. K. L., Chiu, T. K. F., & Chu, S. K. W. (2024) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13411 · Cited by 390
Mei, B., Brown, G. T. L., & Teo, T. (2018) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633117700144 · Cited by 168
Hong, A. J., & Kim, H. J. (2018) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-018-0387-0 · Cited by 104
Development and evaluation of the Internalized Racism in Asian Americans Scale (IRAAS)
Choi, A. Y., Israel, T., & Maeda, H. (2017) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/cou0000183 · Cited by 70
Bowes, S. M., Blanchard, M. C., Costello, T. H., Abramowitz, A. I., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2020) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103992 · Cited by 68
Morales-Álvarez, A., Valdés-Cuervo, A. A., & Parra-Pérez, L. G. (2025) · Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · doi:10.5817/cp2025-1-2 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J.
- Venue
- The Reviewer’s Guide to Quantitative Methods in the Social Sciences
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2018-11-15
- Pages
- 98-122
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.