The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects
Open accessAbstract
Afterword - 1 - Taking the Curriculum to Task 1
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SWAIN, M., & LAPKIN, S. (1995) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/16.3.371 · Cited by 1,407
Fotos, S. S. (1994) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587436 · Cited by 329
Integrating Language and Content in Immersion Classrooms: Research Perspectives
Swain, M. (1996) · The Canadian Modern Language Review · doi:10.3138/cmlr.52.4.529 · Cited by 131
Cited by
Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444812000365 · Cited by 741
Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom
Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190515000094 · Cited by 752
Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching
(2006) · Language Learning & Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.13 · Cited by 608
Task-based research and language pedagogy
Ellis, R. (2000) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/136216880000400302 · Cited by 579
Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work
Fernández Dobao, A. (2012) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2011.12.002 · Cited by 498
Metadata
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315838267-14
- The paper
- Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. (2013). Researching Pedagogic Tasks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315838267-14
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
