The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Visible Learning Insights
Abstract
Visible Learning Insights presents a fascinating ‘inside view’ of the ground-breaking research of John Hattie. Together, the authors John Hattie and Klaus Zierer embark on a mission to build on the internationally renowned work and combine the power and authority of the research with the real ‘coal face’ experience of schools. Offering a concise introduction into the ‘Visible Learning Story’, the book provides busy teachers with a guide to why the Visible Learning research is so vital and the difference it can make to learning outcomes. It includes: An in-depth dialogue between John Hattie and Klaus Zierer. Clearly structured chapters that focus on the core messages of ‘Visible Learning’ and infer practical consequences for the everyday job of teaching. FAQs to Visible Learning that provide an invaluable introduction to the language of learning and success in schools. An overview of the current data set with over 1,400 meta-analyses. Intended for teachers, teacher students, education researchers, parents, and all who are interested in successful learning, teaching, and schooling, this short and elegant introduction outlines just what is required to translate Hattie’s research into improved school performance.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These indicated a high effect (between 0.70 and 0.79) of feedback on student achievement in general.”
From The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research (2020) · cites this paper as Hattie and Zierer (2019)
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research
Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087 · Cited by 1,199
“More specifically, in the classroom domain, Hattie and Timperley (2007), Hattie (2009), and Hattie and Zierer (2019) conducted meta-syntheses relating to the effects of feedback on student achievement (which we refer to as Visible Learning research).”
Self-citationThe need to disentangle assessment and feedback in higher education
Winstone, N., & Boud, D. J. (2020) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2020.1779687 · Cited by 369
Developing and validating a student feedback literacy scale
Zhan, Y. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.2001430 · Cited by 140
Wu, X.-Y. (2024) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2024.103498 · Cited by 125
Han, F. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13095020 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Hattie, J., & Zierer, K.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2019-04-25
- OpenAlex
- W2943172673
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 22.28
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Improvement
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- visible learning, John Hattie, effect size, meta-analysis, teaching practice, academic performance, learning outcomes, teacher professional development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review