The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Team Performance Assessment and Measurement
Abstract
Contents: E.A. Fleishman, Series Editor's Foreword. Preface. Part I:Overview. M.T. Brannick, C. Prince, An Overview of Team Performance Measurement. Part II:Theoretical Developments. T.L. Dickinson, R.M. McIntyre, A Conceptual Framework for Teamwork Measurement. J.A. Cannon-Bowers, E. Salas, A Framework for Developing Team Performance Measures in Training. K. Kraiger, L. Wenzel, Conceptual Development and Empirical Evaluation of Measures of Shared Mental Models as Indicators of Team Effectiveness. C.A. Bowers, C.C. Braun, B.B. Morgan, Jr., Team Workload: Its Meaning and Measurement. Part III:Methodological Developments and Issues. J.R. Hollenbeck, D.J. Sego, D.R. Ilgen, D.A. Major, J. Hedlund, J. Phillips, Team Decision-Making Accuracy Under Difficult Conditions: Construct Validity of Potential Manipulations Using the TIDE2 Simulation. D.J. Dwyer, J.E. Fowlkes, R.L. Oser, E. Salas, N.E. Lane, Team Performance Measurement in Distributed Environments: The TARGETs Methodology. G. Hallam, D. Campbell, The Measurement of Team Performance With a Standardized Survey. J. Mathieu, D. Day, Assessing Processes Within and Between Organizational Teams: A Nuclear Power Plant Example. P. Tesluk, S.J. Zaccaro, M. Marks, J. Mathieu, Task and Aggregation Issues in the Analysis and Assessment of Team Performance. Part IV:Applications. J.L. Komaki, Behind the Scenes: Fieldtesting a Measure of Effectiveness for Theater Teams. J.L. Toquam, J.L. Macaulay, C.D. Westra, Y. Fujita, S.E. Murphy, Assessment of Nuclear Power Plant Crew Performance Variability. A. Prince, M.T. Brannick, C. Prince, E. Salas, The Measurement of Team Process Behaviors in the Cockpit: Lessons Learned. J.H. Johnston, K.A. Smith-Jentsch, J.A. Cannon-Bowers, Performance Measurement Tools for Enhancing Team Decision-Making Training. Part V:Reflections. D. Baker, E. Salas, Principles for Measuring Teamwork: A Summary and Look Toward the Future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Barry Issenberg, S., Mcgaghie, W. C., Petrusa, E. R., Lee Gordon, D., & Scalese, R. J. (2005) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421590500046924 · Cited by 3,966
Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: A review of the literature
MANSER, T. (2009) · Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01717.x · Cited by 1,322
Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams
Kelly, J. R., & Barsade, S. G. (2001) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2974 · Cited by 1,011
Hough, L. M., Oswald, F. L., & Ployhart, R. E. (2001) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00171 · Cited by 429
Towards a cognitive approach to human–machine cooperation in dynamic situations
HOC, J.-M. (2001) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.2000.0454 · Cited by 387
Metadata
- Venue
- Psychology Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Psychology Press
- Published
- 1997-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W1488904891
- Cited by
- 526
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.75
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Team Performance Assessment and Measurement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781410602053
- The paper
- Team Performance Assessment and Measurement. (1997). Psychology Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410602053
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.