The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Team Performance Assessment and Measurement
Abstract
Contents: E.A. Fleishman, Series Editor's Foreword. Preface. Part I:Overview. M.T. Brannick, C. Prince, An Overview of Team Performance Measurement. Part II:Theoretical Developments. T.L. Dickinson, R.M. McIntyre, A Conceptual Framework for Teamwork Measurement. J.A. Cannon-Bowers, E. Salas, A Framework for Developing Team Performance Measures in Training. K. Kraiger, L. Wenzel, Conceptual Development and Empirical Evaluation of Measures of Shared Mental Models as Indicators of Team Effectiveness. C.A. Bowers, C.C. Braun, B.B. Morgan, Jr., Team Workload: Its Meaning and Measurement. Part III:Methodological Developments and Issues. J.R. Hollenbeck, D.J. Sego, D.R. Ilgen, D.A. Major, J. Hedlund, J. Phillips, Team Decision-Making Accuracy Under Difficult Conditions: Construct Validity of Potential Manipulations Using the TIDE2 Simulation. D.J. Dwyer, J.E. Fowlkes, R.L. Oser, E. Salas, N.E. Lane, Team Performance Measurement in Distributed Environments: The TARGETs Methodology. G. Hallam, D. Campbell, The Measurement of Team Performance With a Standardized Survey. J. Mathieu, D. Day, Assessing Processes Within and Between Organizational Teams: A Nuclear Power Plant Example. P. Tesluk, S.J. Zaccaro, M. Marks, J. Mathieu, Task and Aggregation Issues in the Analysis and Assessment of Team Performance. Part IV:Applications. J.L. Komaki, Behind the Scenes: Fieldtesting a Measure of Effectiveness for Theater Teams. J.L. Toquam, J.L. Macaulay, C.D. Westra, Y. Fujita, S.E. Murphy, Assessment of Nuclear Power Plant Crew Performance Variability. A. Prince, M.T. Brannick, C. Prince, E. Salas, The Measurement of Team Process Behaviors in the Cockpit: Lessons Learned. J.H. Johnston, K.A. Smith-Jentsch, J.A. Cannon-Bowers, Performance Measurement Tools for Enhancing Team Decision-Making Training. Part V:Reflections. D. Baker, E. Salas, Principles for Measuring Teamwork: A Summary and Look Toward the Future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Barry Issenberg, S., Mcgaghie, W. C., Petrusa, E. R., Lee Gordon, D., & Scalese, R. J. (2005) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421590500046924 · Cited by 3,966
Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: A review of the literature
MANSER, T. (2009) · Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01717.x · Cited by 1,322
Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams
Kelly, J. R., & Barsade, S. G. (2001) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2974 · Cited by 1,011
Hough, L. M., Oswald, F. L., & Ployhart, R. E. (2001) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00171 · Cited by 429
Towards a cognitive approach to human–machine cooperation in dynamic situations
HOC, J.-M. (2001) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.2000.0454 · Cited by 387
McGaghie, W. C., Siddall, V. J., Mazmanian, P. E., & Myers, J. (2009) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.08-2521 · Cited by 248
Measuring team knowledge: A window to the cognitive underpinnings of team performance.
Cooke, N. J., Kiekel, P. A., Salas, E., Stout, R., Bowers, C., & Cannon-Bowers, J. (2003) · Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.7.3.179 · Cited by 228
Harming high performers: A social comparison perspective on interpersonal harming in work teams.
Lam, C. K., Van der Vegt, G. S., Walter, F., & Huang, X. (2011) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021882 · Cited by 176
Zhang, R., Duan, W., Flathmann, C., McNeese, N., Freeman, G., & Williams, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3610072 · Cited by 134
Kim, S., Eun, J., Oh, C., Suh, B., & Lee, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376785 · Cited by 133
Alliance management teams and entrainment: Sharing temporal mental models
Standifer, R., & Bluedorn, A. (2006) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726706067596 · Cited by 99
Teams in Space Exploration: A New Frontier for the Science of Team Effectiveness
Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Miller, C. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Vessey, W. B. (2015) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721414566448 · Cited by 92
Rosen, M. A., & Dietz, A. S. (2017) · The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Team Working and Collaborative Processes · doi:10.1002/9781118909997.ch21 · Cited by 26
Design implications for teamwork in ATC
Svensson, Å., Ohlander, U., & Lundberg, J. (2020) · Cognition, Technology & Work · doi:10.1007/s10111-019-00579-y · Cited by 18
Aronson, Z. H., Shenhar, A. J., & Reilly, R. R. (2010) · The Journal of High Technology Management Research · doi:10.1016/j.hitech.2010.02.002 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Venue
- Psychology Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Psychology Press
- Published
- 1997-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W1488904891
- Cited by
- 526
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.75
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.