The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Self-Regulating Intellectual Processes and Outcomes: A Social Cognitive Perspective
Abstract
At the dawn of the 21st century, many educational and psychological researchers are seeking to move beyond scientific understanding of human intellectual functioning based on correlations between motivational constructs and academic outcomes to a deeper understanding based on analyses of the causal interdependence of specific learning experiences, motivational beliefs, and academic outcomes. As research on strategy training has shown (Pressley, Borkowski, & Schneider, 1987), instructional efforts that lead to positive learning outcomes do not always produce sustained motivation, and conversely, instructional efforts to boost motivation of students without simultaneously improving their learning processes or competencies do not always produce sustained achievement (Schunk, 1991). Solving the reciprocity issue between learning and motivation is thus crucial to the advancement of educational practice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Observational learning influences students' self-regulatory skills.
“observational learning has been shown to influence students’ self-regulatory skills (e.g., Zimmerman and Schunk, 2004).”
From How Study Environments Foster Academic Procrastination: Overview and Recommendations (2020) · cites this paper as Zimmerman and Schunk, 2004
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Ames, C. (1992). Achievement goals and the classroom motivational climate. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 327–348). Hillsdale, NJ: Law rence Erlbaum Associates.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070600572090 · Cited by 5,846
Exploratory Orientation as an Educational Goal
Flum, H., & Kaplan, A. (2006) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_3 · Cited by 213
How Study Environments Foster Academic Procrastination: Overview and Recommendations
Svartdal, F., Dahl, T. I., Gamst-Klaussen, T., Koppenborg, M., & Klingsieck, K. B. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.540910 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H.
- Venue
- Motivation, Emotion, and Cognition
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2004-07-13
- Pages
- 337-364
- OpenAlex
- W2275909044
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 6.76
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Keywords
- student self-regulation, motivation, academic performance, strategy training, motivational beliefs, learning process, reciprocal causation, social cognitive theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review