The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Children's Reading Comprehension and Assessment
Abstract
Contents: Part I: Historical and Theoretical Foundations. A.P. Sweet, Assessment of Reading Comprehension: The RAND Reading Study Group Vision. P.D. Pearson, D.N. Hamm, The History of Reading Comprehension Assessment. W. Kintsch, E. Kintsch, Comprehension. N.K. Duke, Comprehension of What for What: Comprehension as a Non-Unitary Construct. Part II: Development and Motivational Factors in Reading Comprehension. P. van den Broek, P. Kendeou, K. Kremer, J. Lynch, J. Butler, M.J. White, E.P. Lorch, The Assessment of Comprehension Abilities in Young Children. S.G. Paris, R.D. Carpenter, A.H. Paris, E.E. Hamilton, Spurious and Genuine Correlates of Children's Reading Comprehension. S.A. Stahl, E.H. Hiebert, The Word Factors: A Problem for Reading Comprehension Assessments. J.T. Guthrie, A. Wigfield, Roles of Motivation and Engagement in Reading Comprehension Assessment. R.C. Calfee, R.G. Miller, Comprehending Through Composing: Reflections on Reading Assessment Strategies. Part III: Assessment in School Contexts. B.M. Taylor, P.D. Pearson, Reading Assessment as a Tool to Evaluate and Improve Reading Instruction Within a School. A.S. Palincsar, S.J. Magnusson, E. Pesko, M. Hamlin, Attending to the Nature of Subject Matter in Text Comprehension Assessments. R.D. Carpenter, S.G. Paris, Issues of Validity and Reliability in Early Reading Assessments. M. Pressley, K. Hilden, Commentary on Three Important Directions in Comprehension Assessment Research. Part IV: Large-Scale Assessments of Reading Comprehension. T. Salinger, Assessment of Young Children as They Learn to Read and Write. J.R. Campbell, Single Instrument, Multiple Measures: Considering the Use of Multiple Item Formats to Assess Reading Comprehension. D.J. Francis, J.M. Fletcher, H.W. Catts, J.B. Tomblin, Dimensions Affecting the Assessment of Reading Comprehension. K.K. Wixson, J.F. Carlisle, The Influence of Large-Scale Assessment of Reading Comprehension on Classroom Practice: A Commentary.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality.
Kahneman, D. (2003) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.58.9.697 · Cited by 5,540
Cited by
Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., & Olson, R. K. (2008) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1080/10888430802132279 · Cited by 668
Edmonds, M. S., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C., Cable, A., Tackett, K. K., & Schnakenberg, J. W. (2009) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654308325998 · Cited by 599
The Simple View of Reading: Is It Valid for Different Types of Alphabetic Orthographies?
Florit, E., & Cain, K. (2011) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9175-6 · Cited by 406
The Effects of Vocabulary Breadth and Depth on English Reading
Li, M., & Kirby, J. R. (2014) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amu007 · Cited by 172
Toward Integrative Reading Science: The Direct and Indirect Effects Model of Reading
Kim, Y.-S. G. (2020) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/0022219420908239 · Cited by 166
Metadata
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2005-03-23
- OpenAlex
- W2604769036
- Cited by
- 704
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.94
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Children's Reading Comprehension and Assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781410612762
- The paper
- Children's Reading Comprehension and Assessment. (2005). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410612762
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.