Cited by 37Water Governance and InfrastructureWater Resource Management and QualityWater Resources and Governance

“Water rights, mining and indigenous groups in Chile's Atacama,”

Jessica Budds·2010·Out of the Mainstream

Abstract

One of the most radical neoliberal reforms devised and implemented in Chile under the military regime led by General Augusto Pinochet (1973 to 1990) was the major revision of the Water Code in 1981. This legal and policy process was introduced in Chapter 2 of this book. Designed according to free market principles embraced by the ‘Chicago Boys’ – a group of Chilean economists who studied at the University of Chicago – the result was an extremely neoliberal water law, which introduced a system of private water rights that could be freely traded with almost no government regulation. In Chile, rights to use all surface and groundwater resources are defined as property rights, and the Water Code applies to all uses, including agriculture, drinking water supply, industry, mining and hydroelectric power. Furthermore, the Chilean Water Code has also become significant internationally for its application of neoliberal principles to water management to an unprecedented extent (e.g. Simpson and Ringskog, 1998). These principles corresponded to the free market reforms that were aggressively promoted by multilateral financial institutions (especially the World Bank) to governments of indebted low-and middleincome countries under structural adjustment programmes since the 1980s. In line with the influential 1992 Dublin Principles, water-sector reforms urged during the 1990s included privatization of urban water utilities and the use of water markets to increase the efficient usage of water resources (e.g. Budds and McGranahan, 2003).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781849774796-18

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The application of the Water Code in the past has led to cases of water grabbing in favor of most productive uses and to the detriment of local populations, especially indigenous groups, and ecosystems.

    “the application of the Water Code in the past has led to cases of water grabbing in favor of most productive uses and to the detriment of the local populations, especially indigenous groups, and ecosystems (Budds, 2009(Budds, , 2010(Budds, , 2020;;Yáñez and Molina, 2011;Prieto, 2015Prieto, , 2016;;Prieto et al., 2022).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Budds, J.
Corresponding author
Jessica Budds
Venue
Out of the Mainstream
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2010-02-26
Pages
215-230
OpenAlex
W88270760
Cited by
37
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
20.65
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Research Online (The Open University) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Water Governance and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
  • Social Sciences › Law › Water Resources and Governance
Keywords
water rights, mining, indigenous peoples, Atacama Desert, water markets, privatization, structural adjustment, Pinochet dictatorship, water governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review