Cited by 28Water Governance and InfrastructureMining and Resource ManagementEnvironmental law and policy

Water or mineral resource? Legal interpretations and hydrosocial configurations of lithium mining in Chile

Open access
Flores Fernández, Cristián, Alba, Rossella·2023·Frontiers in Water

Abstract

The advance of electromobility has boosted global demand and interest in lithium. The consequent expansion of lithium mining puts the sustainability of Chile's Andean salt flats at risk. In these unique ecosystems, lithium is abstracted from mineralized groundwaters, referred to also as brines. This article analyses the legal treatment of brines and its implications in assessing the socioecological impacts of lithium mining projects. For our analysis, we draw from scholarship at the intersection between hydrosocial research and critical legal geography. Methodologically, our study is based on interviews and the analysis of legal texts and judicial and administrative claims, including the environmental impact assessment studies of the three single lithium mining projects approved in the country. We show that the interpretation of brines as mining resources supported by mining companies and endorsed by environmental State agencies is based on a legal loophole. We document how such interpretation is operationalized and contested in the environmental impact assessments of three mining projects and other instances. We explore how the same legal loophole could lead to alternative interpretations and relatedly regulatory proposals and discuss their implication for the assessment of socioecological impacts of mining projects. These include first an understanding of brines as hybrids minerals/waters put forward in a recent report commissioned by State agencies, and second an interpretation of brines as a type of water. The latter is in line with the position of some indigenous groups and academics. We conclude with reflections on the implications of our analysis for lithium mining in Chile and beyond.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The article argues that Chile’s regulation of lithium brine extraction rests on a legal loophole: brines are treated as mining resources rather than water, enabling lithium projects in Andean salt flats. Through hydrosocial and critical legal geography analysis of three approved projects, it shows how this interpretation is operationalized in environmental assessments and contested by indigenous groups and alternative legal readings.

Key findings

  • Chile has no specific legal framework for mineralized groundwaters; mining legislation is extended to salt flats through legal coupling. The Constitution and Mining Code treat salt flats as State mining patrimony, and Mining Code Regulations art. 60 defines salt flats as superficial saline deposits with “occluded saline solutions,” allowing brines to be classified as mining resources rather than water.
  • In the environmental impact assessments of the three approved projects—SQM (1,600 l/s brine, 240 l/s freshwater, RCA 226/2006), Albemarle (442 l/s brine, 23.5 l/s freshwater, RCA 21/2016), and MSB’s Proyecto Blanco (209 l/s brine, 35 l/s freshwater, RCA 94/2020)—companies modeled brine aquifers as separated or disconnected from freshwater-brackish aquifers, ruling out or minimizing impacts on water resources, wetlands, and communities. Regulators sometimes contested this, but the interpretation was ultimately endorsed.
  • Indigenous groups and some academics contest the brine/water divide, arguing that brine is a type of water and the salt flat is an interconnected ecosystem. A 2020 Ministry of Mining-commissioned report proposed a hybrid interpretation of brines as “mineralized aqueous deposits” and water resources with high salinity, but it remained within mining logic and did not result in regulatory innovation.
  • The paper argues that legally recognizing brines as water would trigger the Water Code, including water rights, the “unity of stream” principle, restriction zones, and indigenous consultation under ILO Convention 169, though it notes that DGA institutional weaknesses mean recognition alone would not ensure sustainable or just governance.

Methods

  • Qualitative study drawing on hydrosocial research and critical legal geography. The first author conducted 25 interviews in 2021 and 2022 with hydrologists, legal experts, civil society members, and State administration officials, including the Ministry of Mining and the General Directorate of Water (DGA).
  • Document review included the Chilean constitution, Chilean and foreign mining and water laws and regulations, judicial and administrative claims, and environmental impact assessment studies for the three single lithium mining projects with an Environmental Qualification Resolution (RCA) authorizing brine extraction: SQM and Albemarle in the Salar de Atacama, and MSB’s Proyecto Blanco in the Salar de Maricunga.
  • Analysis focused on how and whether mineralized groundwaters are defined as waters or mineral resources, and how their extraction is related to the extraction of other waters.

Limitations

  • The paper states that supporting data are not readily available because of the sensitive nature of the research; it also states that ethical review and written informed consent were not required under national and institutional requirements.
  • The paper does not include a dedicated limitations section. Evident from the text, the analysis is limited to three approved lithium projects in Chile and relies on interviews and legal/document review rather than independent hydrogeological measurement or modeling.
  • Quotes from Spanish-language documents are the authors’ own translations, and the analysis depends on company, State, and interviewee accounts and documents.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/frwa.2023.1075139

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 123 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingcitation

    Lithium companies have promoted the legal interpretation of mineralized groundwaters as mining resources by publicly denying their water character.

    “Lithium companies have promoted the legal interpretation of mineralized groundwaters as mining resources by publicly denying their water character (SONAMI, 2017; SQM Salar S.A., 2021a, p. 08).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites SONAMI, 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites SQM Salar S.A., 2021a

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingcitation

    Mining companies take as reference water quality standards for irrigation water (Chilean norm 1333) and drinking water (Chilean norm 409) that establish maximum concentration limits of 5,000 and 1,500 mg/L respectively.

    “Mining companies take as a reference water quality standard for irrigation water (Chilean norm 1333) and drinking water (Chilean norm 409) that establish corresponding maximum concentration limits of 5.000 and 1.500 mg/L respectively (SQM Salar S.A., 2021a).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites SQM Salar S.A., 2021a

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingreasoning

    However, the decision was later revoked by the national environmental assessment bodies following a complaint filed by the company.

    “However, the decision was later revoked by the national environmental assessment bodies following a complaint filed by the company.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    Despite recognizing brines as saline groundwater, SQM presented and treated its extractions of brines separately from the extraction of freshwater for mining processes.

    “Despite this, SQM presented and treated its extractions of brines separately from the extraction of freshwater for mining processes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    According to RCA 226/2006, SQM could today extract net annual quotas of 1,600 l/s of brine (plus extra quotas for reinjection of waste brine) and 240 l/s of freshwater.

    “According to this resolution SQM could today extract net annual quotas of 1,600 l/s of brine (to which are added extra quotas for the reinjection of waste brine) and 240 l/s of freshwater.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 102
  • May combine two claims. 57
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    Indigenous consultation has begun to be considered in the case of future CEOLs.

    “Indigenous consultation, at least, has begun to be considered in the case of future CEOLs (Supreme Court, ).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Supreme Court

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    This project was presented in 1994 through an EIA by MINSAL, a company subsequently bought by SQM.

    “This project was presented in 1994 through and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) by the Sociedad Minera Salar de Atacama Ltda (MINSAL), company subsequently bought by SQM.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    In 1996, a new EIA was submitted and SQM obtained an RCA to start lithium carbonate production, authorizing the extraction of 215 l/s gross brine and 22.5 l/s of freshwater.

    “In the same year, a new EIA was submitted and SQM obtained an RCA to start lithium carbonate production, authorizing the extraction of 215 l/s gross brine and 22.5 l/s of freshwater.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The first mining project for exploiting mineral groundwaters that entered the SEIA was a potassium chloride production project in the Salar de Atacama.

    “The first mining project for exploiting mineral groundwaters that entered the SEIA was a potassium chloride production project in the Salar de Atacama.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Mineralized groundwater and its interactions with lower salinity aquifers have not been subject to greater analysis or integrated into the DGA's studies, models and water balances, an issue that has recently been attempted to be partially rectified, at least for the Salar de Atacama.

    “For this reason, mineralized groundwater and its interactions with lower salinity aquifers have not been subject to greater analysis or integrated into the DGA's studies, models and water balances, an issue that has recently been attempted to be partially rectified, at least for the Salar de Atacama (CORFO, 2021; DGA, 2021a).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites CORFO, 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites DGA, 2021a

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The potassium project was approved in 1995 and subsequently started in 1996.

    “The potassium project was approved in 1995 and subsequently started in 1996.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Water that evaporates after extraction is not considered as part of water consumption by lithium companies, which point out that their operations consume practically no freshwater.

    “Thus, water that evaporates after extraction is not considered as part of water consumption by lithium companies, which point out that their operations consume practically no freshwater (SONAMI, 2017; Bustos-Gallardo et al., 2021; SQM Salar S.A., 2021a; Albemarle, n.d., p. 08).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites SONAMI, 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Bustos-Gallardo et al., 2021 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites SQM Salar S.A., 2021a

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Between 1996 and 2005, SQM submitted requests to increase its quotas, obtaining in 2006 the RCA 226/2006.

    “Between 1996 and 2005, SQM submitted requests to increase its quotas, obtaining in 2006 the RCA 226/2006.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    The interpretation of brines as mining resources separated from water is contested by some indigenous groups and others who support an understanding of brines as (a type of) waters.

    “by some indigenous groups and others who rather support an understanding of brines as (a type of) waters.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).

    Findingcitation

    Mining companies argue that brines are unsuitable for human consumption or activities related to agriculture and livestock.

    “Therefore, the argument goes, they are unsuitable for human consumption or activities related to agriculture and livestock (SQM Salar S.A., 2021a; Albemarle, n.d.).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites SQM Salar S.A., 2021a

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Albemarle, n.d.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingcitation

    Mining companies argue that extracted brines cannot be considered water resources because they contain more than 300,000 mg/L of total dissolved solids (TDS; ten times more than seawater).

    “In official reports published, mining companies argue that extracted brines cannot be considered water resources because they contain more than 300.000 mg/L of total dissolved solids (TDS; ten times more than seawater).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites SQM Salar S.A., 2021a

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Albemarle, n.d.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).

    Findingcitation

    This was used by SQM to argue that despite the decreases in the water table generated by the brine extraction in the aquifers, neither the water resources nor the natural behavior of the lagoons and wetlands requested quotas would be significantly affected.

    “This in turn was used by SQM to argue that despite the decreases in the water table generated by the brine extraction in the aquifers, neither the water resources nor the natural behavior of the lagoons and wetlands requested quotas would be significantly affect (SQM Salar S. A., 2005a, p. 210-216;SQM Salar S.A., 2005b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites SQM Salar S. A., 2005a

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites SQM Salar S.A., 2005b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    While mineralized waters are extracted from the core aquifer, freshwaters are extracted from the southwestern aquifers of the salt flat, mainly from the MNT aquifer that sustain the Tilopozo meadows.

    “While mineralized waters are extracted from the core aquifer, freshwaters are extracted from the southwestern aquifers of the salt flat, mainly from the Monturaqui-Negrillar-Tilopozo (MNT) aquifer that sustain the Tilopozo meadows.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    Accordingly, the request for extraction of an extra 29 l/s brine quota, totaling 142 l/s, was approved.

    “Accordingly, the request for extraction of an extra 29 l/s brine quota, totaling 142 l/s, was approved (RCA 3132/2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites RCA 3132/2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    In 2016, after cumbersome environmental assessment processes, Albemarle obtained RCA 21/2016 which authorizes it today to extract 442 l/s of brine and 23.5 l/s of freshwater from the salt flat basin.

    “In 2016 and after cumbersome environmental assessment processes Albemarle obtained RCA 21/2016 which authorizes it today to extract 442 l/s of brine and 23,5 l/s of freshwater from the salt flat basin.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    Based on this argument it submitted an EIS that was rejected by the environmental authorities.

    “Based on this argument it submitted an EIS that was rejected by the environmental authorities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Environmental non-compliance included, among others, the extraction of brine in excess of authorized quotas (3.9%), adverse impacts on protected flora and the non-compliance and modification of monitoring and warning plans without authorization.

    “Environmental non-compliance included, among others, the extraction of brine in excess of authorized quotas (3.9%), adverse impacts on protected flora and the non-compliance and modification of monitoring and warning plans without authorization (SMA, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites SMA, 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The environmental authorities argued that the project was likely to cause significant adverse effects on the quantity and quality of renewable natural resources and thus an EIA should be submitted.

    “The latter argued that the project was likely to cause significant adverse effects on the quantity and quality of renewable natural resources and thus a EIA should be submitted (COREMA II, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites COREMA II, 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingcitation

    The EIA refers to data suggesting a limited hydraulic connection between brines and the lagoons.

    “The EIA refers to data suggesting a limited hydraulic connection between brines and the lagoons (MINSAL, 1994, p. 185).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites MINSAL, 1994

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Albemarle Limitada started its lithium production in the Salar de Atacama in 1984.

    “Albemarle Limitada started its lithium production in the Salar de Atacama in 1984.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    The company argued that the predicted decline of <10 cm in 25 years would not imply a considerable loss in the amount of ecological soil capable of providing habitat for the biodiversity that inhabits the ecosystems.

    “The company argued that the predicted decline-of <10 cm in 25 years-would not imply a considerable loss in the amount of ecological soil capable of providing habitat for the biodiversity that inhabits the ecosystems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The division between the water and brine aquifers has been discussed in recent years as part of the auditing and sanction processes started by the SMA against SQM.

    “The division between the water and brine aquifers has been discussed in recent years as part of the auditing and sanction processes started by the Superintendency of the Environment, SMA, against SQM.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    As part of the auditing process, it was recognized that there is a high degree of scientific uncertainty regarding the hydrodynamic behavior of the salt flat and a lack of information regarding its hydrogeological functioning and water balance.

    “Importantly, as part of the auditing process, it was recognized that there is a high degree of scientific uncertainty regarding the hydrodynamic behavior of the salt flat and a lack of information regarding its hydrogeological functioning and water balance (First Environmental Court, 2019; see also Amphos21, 2018, p. 321;ff and DGA, 2021a).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites First Environmental Court, 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Amphos21, 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites DGA, 2021a

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingcitation

    The EIA reaffirmed the disconnections between brine aquifers and less saline aquifers by a barrier of low hydraulic conductivity.

    “The EIA reaffirmed the disconnections between brine aquifers and less saline aquifers-by a barrier of low hydraulic conductivity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    The numerical modeling presented to calculate the water balance and fluid flow indicated that the extractions requested would have a slight impact on the lagoon's groundwater table (phreatic level).

    “Building on this, the numerical modeling presented to calculate the water balance and fluid flow indicated that the extractions requested would have a slight impact on the lagoon's groundwater table (phreatic level).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    These extractions are carried out from aquifers that feed or are connected to lagoons and wetlands located on the eastern edge of the salt flat, part of which are included in the Los Flamencos National Reserve and Ramsar Site Soncor.

    “These extractions are carried out from aquifers that feed or are connected to lagoons and wetlands located on the eastern edge of the salt flat, part of which are included in the Los Flamencos National Reserve and Ramsar Site Soncor.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    These processes summarize recent investigation by the SMA on the operation of SQM carried out after repeated environmental and contractual breaches, and illegal political financing of SQM became known.

    “These processes summarize recent investigation by the SMA on the operation of SQM carried out after repeated environmental and contractual breaches, and illegal political financing of SQM became known (Poveda, 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Poveda, 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    While Albemarle considers brine separately from water, (part of) the environmental authorities consider mineralized groundwaters as water in their own right to weigh the impacts of their extraction.

    “While Albemarle considers brine separately from water, (part of) the environmental authorities consider mineralized groundwaters as water in their own right to weigh the impacts of their extraction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Nevertheless, the project was revived by filing an appeal for reconsideration, leading to the submission of two new addenda, halving the requested brine quota increase to 300 l/s.

    “Nevertheless, the project was revived by filing an appeal for reconsideration (SCL, 2011), leading to the submission of two new addenda, halving the requested brine quota increase to 300 l/s.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites SCL, 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Groups such as the Atacameño/Lickanantay indigenous communities of Peine, Toconao and Socaire attempted to question the company's position on the impacts and meaning, and functioning of the salt flat and its multiple waters, but their comments were not included due to formal reasons.

    “Indeed, groups such as the Atacameño/Lickanantay indigenous communities of Peine, Toconao and Socaire attempted to question the company's position on the impacts and meaning, and functioning of the salt flat and its multiple waters.Still, their comments were not included due to formal reasons.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    According to these assumptions, the company postulated that the project and its new extraction quotas would not generate significant adverse social or environmental impact.

    “According to these assumptions, the company postulated that the project and its new extraction quotas would not generate significant adverse social or environmental impact (SQM Salar S. A., 2005a, p. 37-39).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites SQM Salar S. A., 2005a

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Eventually, SQM obtained the RCA 226/2006 authorizing its current extraction quotas, whose maintenance and management have involved subsequent updates of hydrogeological modeling initially presented.

    “Eventually, SQM obtained the RCA 226/2006 authorizing its current extraction quotas, whose maintenance and management have involved subsequent updates of hydrogeological modeling initially presented.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingcitation

    The techno-scientific and legal conceptualizations that separate mineralized groundwater and water have been challenged by the CPA.

    “The techno-scientific and legal conceptualizations that separate mineralized groundwater and water have been challenged by the CPA.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The CPA intervened both in the sanctioning procedure against SQM and in the claims filed against the agreement that CORFO signed with SQM in 2018 to continue exploiting the salt flat.

    “The CPA intervened both in the sanctioning procedure against SQM and in the claims filed against the agreement that CORFO signed with SQM in 2018 to continue exploiting the salt flat.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Later, in 2009, Albemarle sought to increase its brine quota by 600 l/s as an annual average by submitting an EIA.

    “Later, in 2009, Albemarle sought to increase its brine quota by 600 l/s as an annual average by submitting an EIA.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    In 2004 and 2009 the company requested to increase its brine extraction quota, first through an EIS and then through an EIA.

    “Subsequently, in 2004 and2009 the company requested to increase its brine extraction quota, first through an EIS and then through an EIA.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The company ruled out that its operations would significantly impact water resources (lagoon waters and not brines), biodiversity and the traditional agricultural and livestock livelihoods of members of the Atacameño/Lickanantay ethnic group settled east of the salt flat.

    “Hence, the company ruled out that its operations would significantly impact water resources-here referring to lagoon waters and not to brines-biodiversity and the traditional agricultural and livestock livelihoods of members of the Atacameño/Lickanantay ethnic group settled east of the salt flat (MINSAL, 1994, p. 187).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites MINSAL, 1994

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    These facilities, initially operated by SCL and then Rockwood, entered the SEIA system for the first time in 2000 through an EIS, obtaining the environmental authorization to pump 113 l/s of mineralized groundwater in the RCA 092/2000.

    “These facilities, initially operated by Sociedad Chilena del Litio (SCL) and then Rockwood, entered the SEIA system for the first time in 2000 through an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), obtaining the environmental authorization to pump 113 l/s of mineralized groundwater in the RCA 092/2000 (Rockwood, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rockwood, 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    These aquifers were conceptualized in the hydrological models as disconnected from the shallow saline aquifers that support the socio-hydrological system of the Salar de Maricunga due to the presence of a clay hydrogeological structure.

    “These aquifers were conceptualized in the hydrological models as disconnected from the shallow saline aquifers that support the socio-hydrological system of the Salar de Maricunga due to the presence of a clay hydrogeological structure.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Based on this conceptualization of confined aquifers, MSB ruled out the generation of significant environmental effects on the water resource, loss of wetland vegetation, endemic flora, and in general, on the aquatic ecosystems associated with the protected areas of the salt flat belonging to the Nevado Tres Cruces National Park and the Ramsar site Complejo Lagunar Francisco and Laguna Santa Rosa.

    “Based on this conceptualization of confined aquifers, MSB ruled out the generation of significant environmental effects on the water resource, loss of wetland vegetation, endemic flora, and in general, on the aquatic ecosystems associated with the protected areas of the salt flat belonging to the Nevado Tres Cruces National Park and the Ramsar site Complejo Lagunar Francisco and Laguna Santa Rosa”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites MSB, 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites SEA, 2020a

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites SEA, 2020b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    The RCAs of Albemarle and SQM and the commitments established therein are concatenated (e.g., the execution of their monitoring and warning plans are conditioned to those of the other company).

    “It is important to keep in mind that the RCAs of Albemarle and SQM and the commitments established therein are concatenated (e.g., the execution of their monitoring and warning plans are conditioned to those of the other company) (DGA, 2021a, p. 133).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites DGA, 2021a

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingcitation

    According to previous studies by the DGA to determine water availability, the salt flat basin had a water demand balance deficit of -344 l/s.

    “According to previous studies by the DGA to determinate water availability, the salt flat basin had a water demand balance deficit of -344 l/s (DGA, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites DGA, 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The project involves the extraction of 209 l/s of brine and 35 l/s of freshwater to feed the industrial processes, both to be pumped from the Salar de Maricunga basin.

    “The project involves the extraction of 209 l/s of brine and 35 l/s of freshwater to feed the industrial processes, both to be pumped from the Salar de Maricunga basin (SEA, 2020a).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites SEA, 2020a

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    In the same month, the State filed a lawsuit for environmental damage against Albemarle and two other companies that extracted water from the MNT aquifer.

    “In the same month, the State filed a lawsuit for environmental damage against Albemarle and two other companies that extracted water from the MNT aquifer.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Therefore, the open indigenous consultation only considered this community, excluding those directly related to the salt flat basin.

    “Therefore, the open indigenous consultation only considered this community, excluding those directly related to the salt flat basin (MSB, 2018;SEA, 2020a,b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites MSB, 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites SEA, 2020a

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites SEA, 2020b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    As a result, these indigenous groups supported the project, which was approved by RCA 21/2016.

    “As a result, these indigenous groups supported the project, which was approved by RCA 21/2016.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The lawsuit denounced that the extractions generated a decrease in the water level above what was environmentally permitted and affecting the Tilopozo meadows.

    “The lawsuit denounced that the extractions generated a decrease in the water level above what was environmentally permitted and affecting the Tilopozo meadows (CDE, 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites CDE, 2022

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingcitation

    The company's studies indicated that the Colla settlements, lands, waters and transhumant routes were located far from the project works and outside the area of influence defined for impact on human groups which excluded the salt flat and wetlands.

    “The company's studies indicated that the Colla settlements, lands, waters and transhumant routes were located far from the project works and outside the area of influence defined for impact on human groups which excluded the salt flat and wetlands (MSB, 2018;SEA, 2020b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites MSB, 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites SEA, 2020b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In these addenda, the company presented evidence based on a new hydrological model that considered a semi-impermeable saline interface between brine aquifers and freshwater-saline ones; this structure would physically separate the core brine and the freshwater-saline aquifer that feeds the lagoons and wetlands.

    “In these addenda, the company presented evidence based on a new hydrological model that considered a semi-impermeable saline interface between brine aquifers and freshwater-saline ones.This structure would physically separate the core brine and the freshwater-saline aquifer that feeds the lagoons and wetlands (Rockwood, 2014(Rockwood, , 2015)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Rockwood, 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rockwood, 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    In the context of the lawsuit, Albemarle offered to stop using its water rights from MNT (18.5 l/s of the 23.5 l/s authorized in RCA 21/2016).

    “In the context of the lawsuit, Albemarle offered to stop using its water rights from MNT (18.5 l/s of the 23.5 l/s authorized in RCA 21/2016) (Albemarle, 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Albemarle, 2023

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The new studies and hydrogeological models concluded that the requested increase in extraction would not generate adverse impacts on the lagoon and aquifer systems of the salt flats, and on the life systems and customs of the groups living in the basin.

    “The new studies and hydrogeological models concluded that the requested increase in extraction would not generate adverse impacts on the lagoon and aquifer systems of the salt flats, and on the life systems and customs of the groups living in the basin.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    This situation occurs in a general scenario where the functioning, evolution and water health of the lagoon systems, meadows, peatlands and native species are unknown, as well as the impacts that the extraction of freshwater and brine generate on them and the entire Salar de Atacama basin.

    “This situation occurs in a general scenario where the functioning, evolution and water health of the lagoon systems, meadows, peatlands and native species are unknown, as well as the impacts that the extraction of freshwater and brine generate on them and the entire Salar de Atacama basin (DGA, 2021a, p. 274-276, 300).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites DGA, 2021a

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingcitation

    Within the EIA process, different interpretations of brines were put forward.

    “Within the EIA process, different interpretations of brines were put forward.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    The mining company dealt with these concerns by establishing agreements with Atacameño/Lickanantay community of Peine and the CPA and thus ruling out adverse impacts on them.

    “The mining company dealt with these concerns by establishing agreements with Atacameño/Lickanantay community of Peine and the CPA and thus ruling out adverse impacts on them (Rockwood, 2015, p. 151-153).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rockwood, 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    Thus, MSB concluded that the project would only affect the transhumance practices of specific members of the Colla Community of Diego de Almagro due to the increased traffic generated by the operation of the project on surrounding routes.

    “Thus, MSB concluded that the project would only affect the transhumance practices of specific members of the Colla Community of Diego de Almagro due to the increased traffic generated by the operation of the project on surrounding routes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The Min.Minería report recognizes interaction and interdependence between waters and brines, requiring brine extraction operations to be registered in the DGA's public water cadastre.

    “The report recognizes a degree of interaction and interdependence between waters and brines requiring brine extraction operations to be registered in the DGA's public water founded”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Min.Minería, 2020b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Several administrative and judicial appeals were filed for the annulment of the RCA, alleging the unfounded exclusion of significant impacts and indigenous communities in the consultation process, among other infractions.

    “Several administrative and judicial appeals were filed for the annulment of the RCA, alleging the unfounded exclusion of significant impacts and indigenous communities in the consultation process, among other infractions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Except for one claim still pending, all the appeals have been dismissed to date.

    “Nevertheless, except for one claim still pending, all the appeals have been dismissed to date.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Despite the multiple observations, the SEA favorably qualified the project on 04 February 2020 through RCA No. 94/2020 endorsing the company's studies and assessments.

    “Despite the multiple observations, the SEA favorably qualified the project on 04 February 2020 through RCA No. 94/2020 endorsing the company's studies and assessments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The information contained in the EIA and subsequent addenda was the subject of multiple requests for clarification, rectification or additions by sectorial bodies and observations made within the citizen participation instances.

    “The information contained in the EIA and subsequent addenda was the subject of multiple requests for clarification, rectification or additions by sectorial bodies and observations made within the citizen participation instances.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The proposed regulation's hybrid water/brine interpretation does not entail restrictions or prohibitions for granting extraction quotas in basins or degraded or environmentally valuable areas, nor prior integrated management of the basin, nor greater participation or consideration of local communities' water uses and visions.

    “Although it proposes a hybrid water/brine interpretation, it does not entail restrictions or prohibitions for granting extraction quotas in basins or degraded or environmentally valuable areas, a previous understanding and integrated management of the basin, nor greater participation or consideration of water uses and visions of local communities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    They also indicated that the EIA lacked essential information to analyze the impacts generated by the affectation of groundwater flows on the lagoon and wetlands present in the National Park and the Ramsar Site and their characteristic flora and fauna, such as flamingos, vicuñas and guanacos' population.

    “They also indicate that the EIA lacked essential information to analyze the impacts generated by the affectation of groundwater flows on the lagoon and wetlands present in the National Park and the Ramsar Site and their characteristic flora and fauna, such as flamingos, vicuñas and guanacos' population (DGA, 2018a(DGA, , 2019)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites DGA, 2018a

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites DGA, 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingcitation

    In July 2020, the Ministry of Mining commissioned a study for the elaboration of a regulation for the extraction and use of brines located for mining purposes.

    “In July 2020, the Ministry of Mining commissioned a study for the elaboration of a regulation for the extraction and use of brines located for mining purposes (Min.Minería, 2020a).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Min. Minería, 2020a

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Specific objectives of the study included defining the legal nature of mineralized groundwaters, the permits required for their extraction and its treatment in relation to other water sources present in a specific site.

    “Specific objectives of the study included defining the legal nature of mineralized groundwaters, the permits required for their extraction and its treatment in relation to other water sources present in a specific site (Min.Minería, 2020a, p. 36).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Min. Minería, 2020a

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    Indigenous groups also intervened to question how MSB defined the impacts of the project.

    “Indigenous groups also intervened to question how MSB defined the impacts of the project.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    Sernageomin and the DGA questioned the central hypothesis of the models, which consisted of the supposed disconnection between the deep brine aquifer and the shallow aquifer.

    “Among others, the Geology and Mining Service (Sernageomin) and the DGA questioned the central hypothesis of the models, which consisted of the supposed disconnection between the deep brine aquifer and the shallow aquifer (Sernageomin, 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sernageomin, 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The proposed regulation did not result in regulatory innovations and remained unknown to current governmental authorities such as the Ministry of Mining itself (at least until the 2022 interviews).

    “At the end, the proposal did not result in regulatory innovations and remained unknown to the current governmental authorities such as the Ministry of Mining itself (at least until the date of the interviews in 2022).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    While mining companies back the interpretation of brine as a mineral and build a particular understanding of hydrosocial relations in the Salar de Atacama and Maricunga, indigenous groups put forward different understandings of brine as a type of water.

    “While mining companies back the interpretation of brine as a mineral and on this, they build a particular understanding of hydrosocial relations in the Salar de Atacama and Maricunga, indigenous groups put forward different understandings of brine as a type of water.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingreasoning

    In these studies, brines and freshwaters of the salt flats are conceptualized as separate entities on scientific grounds that are currently the subject of intense scrutiny.

    “In these studies, brines and freshwaters of the salt flats are conceptualized as separate entities on scientific grounds that are currently the subject of intense scrutiny.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Even though the general water balances of the basins are in deficit, limitations have only been introduced reactively without preventing overexploitation and environmental damage to local ecosystems.

    “even though the general water balances of the basins are in deficit, limitations have only been introduced reactively without preventing overexploitation and environmental damage to local ecosystems (DGA, 2018b(DGA, , 2021a;;Babidge et al., 2019;CDE, 2022).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites DGA, 2018b

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites DGA, 2021a

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Babidge et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    The focus of the debate tends to be on the appropriate business model to push forward and expand lithium mining in the short and medium term and take advantage of the boom in price and demand at almost any cost.

    “the focus of the debate tends to be on the appropriate business model to push forward and expand lithium mining in the short and medium term and take advantage of the boom in price and demand at almost any cost.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Although creating a strong State-owned company was one of the campaign banners of the current government, more expeditious public-private partnership modalities close to those currently operating are gaining greater importance within the non-participatory, announced and delayed new National Lithium Strategy.

    “although creating a strong State-owned company was one of the campaign banners of the current government, more expeditious public-private partnership modalities close to those currently operating are gaining greater importance within the non-participatory, announced and delayed new National Lithium Strategy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    To date, the only special lithium operation contract (CEOL) is the one signed with the subsidiary of the State-owned company CODELCO for projects in the Salar de Maricunga.

    “To date, the only special lithium operation contract (CEOL) is the one signed in with the subsidiary of the State-owned company CODELCO for projects in the Salar de Maricunga (currently in the exploratory stage).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Two tenders were awarded to enter CEOLs with the State but were overturned by the Supreme Court.

    “Two tenders were awarded in to enter CEOLs with the State but were overturned by the Supreme Court in .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Mineralized groundwater could be defined as "occluded saline solutions" (not as water resources) and as a constituent part of the salt flat, and therefore as a mining resource within mining deposits.

    “Thus, mineralized groundwater could be defined as “occluded saline solutions” (not as water resources) and as constituent part of the salt flat being, therefore, a mining resource within mining deposits (Min.Minería, 2020a, p. 36;Min. Minería, 2020b, p. 13, 32).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Min.Minería, 2020a

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Min. Minería, 2020b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisecitation

    For commercial purposes, the Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission (CCHEN) must have previously approved marketing lithium quotas according to DL and Law No.

    “For commercial proposes, the Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission (CCHEN) must also have previously approved marketing lithium quotas according to DL .and Law No. . .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites DL

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Law No.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    Salt flats could be understood as another type of static mining deposit.

    “In this sense, salt flats could be understood as another type of static mining deposit (Tala, 1994, p. 45;Min. Minería, 2020b, p. 5;Jerez et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Tala, 1994

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Min. Minería, 2020b

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Jerez et al., 2021 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    As groundwaters, mineralized groundwaters should in principle be governed by the Water Code, which applies indistinctly to all terrestrial surface and groundwater.

    “At the same time, as groundwaters, in principle, they should be governed by the Water Code, which stipulates that its provisions apply indistinctly to all terrestrial waters, both surface and groundwater.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Recent reports commissioned by the Ministry of Mining indicate the eminently "mining nature" of brines, linked to the Mining Code Regulations (art. 60) defining salt flat as a superficial saline deposit with occluded saline solutions.

    “Specifically, the eminently “mining nature” of brines has been indicated by recent reports commissioned by the Ministry of Mining as linked to the provision contained in the Mining Code Regulations (art.60), which define salt flat as “a superficial saline deposit, consisting of a saline crust of variable thickness, with occluded saline solutions (. . .)” (Min.Minería, 2020b, p. 13).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Min.Minería, 2020b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The State has ownership of salt flats and their mineralized groundwaters and may grant mining concessions, administrative contracts, CEOLs, or explore and exploit them directly or through its companies depending on the mineral substances to be obtained.

    “First, the State has ownership on salt flats and its mineralized groundwaters and may grant mining concessions, administrative contracts, CEOLs or explore and exploit them directly or through its companies depending on the mineral substances to be obtained.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Projects for the exploitation of lithium and other mineral substances must enter the SEIA based on the typology of mining projects and the amount of brine extracted (classified as a mineral by the SEA).

    “According to the SEA, projects for the exploitation of lithium and other mineral substances must enter the SEIA based on the typology of mining projects and the amount of brine extracted (classified as a mineral by the SEA) (SEA, 2021, p. 15).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites SEA, 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The SEIA was established in the Environmental Basis Law (EBL).

    “The SEIA was established in the Environmental Basis Law (EBL) of .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Salt flats are fragile ecosystems characterized by unique biodiversity, including birds in conservation categories and benthonic microorganisms fundamental to trophic chains.

    “Salt flats are fragile ecosystems characterized by unique biodiversity, including birds in the conservation category, such as flamingos, and benthonic microorganisms fundamental to the tropic chains.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Dorador et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Dorador et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Thiel et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    Since the entry into force of the SEIA, environmental permits must be obtained before the construction and operation of mining projects.

    “Since the entry into force of the SEIA, these permits must be obtained before the construction and operation of the projects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Citizen participation processes are mandatory for EIAs and eventual for EISs.

    “EIA and EIS is that citizen participation processes are mandatory for the former.For the latter, they are eventual.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites EBL

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites SEIA Regulation

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    By not applying water law restriction, permits to extract and consume brine may be obtained in basins with insufficient water balances, and they may also not be declared as depleted or areas prohibited for the constitution of water rights.

    “By not applying water law restriction, permits to extract and consume brine may be obtained in basins with insufficient water balances.They may also not be declared as depleted or areas prohibited for the constitution of water rights.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    If the presented information is approved, the projects obtain their environmental license (RCA).

    “If the presented information is approved, the projects obtain his environmental license (RCA).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The EIA applies to projects that potentially involve health risks, adverse effects on renewable natural resources, resettlement or significant impacts on the living environment and customs of people, and if they are in the vicinity of populations, resources and protected areas; when projects do not generate these effects, an EIS can be submitted.

    “The EIA applies to projects that potentially involve, among others, health risks, adverse effects on renewable natural resources, resettlement or significant impacts on the living environment and customs of people and if they are in the vicinity of populations, resources and protected areas.When projects do not generate these effects, an EIS can be submitted.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Environmental Basis Law

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Only after the EBL did projects begin to be environmentally evaluated, which became mandatory with the entry into force of its regulations; during the interim period, entry to the SEIA was voluntary.

    “Only after that date did projects begin to be environmentally evaluated, which became mandatory with the entry into force of its regulations in .During the interim period, entry to the SEIA was voluntary.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The CPA argues that the PdC was based on a conceptual model that assumes hydraulic independence between the core of the salt flat and the lagoon systems of the marginal zone, without a robust scientific basis.

    “Among other issues, the CPA argues that the PdC was based on a conceptual model that assumes hydraulic independence between the core of the salt flat and the lagoon systems of the marginal zone, without a robust scientific basis (CPA, 2022, p. 49).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites CPA, 2022

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    This interpretation of brine as nonwater and as brines as separated from other waters opposes the conception of basin unity underpinning the cosmovision of the indigenous communities for whom all the waters are part of the salt flat ecosystem.

    “This interpretation of brine as nonwater and as brines as separated from other waters opposes the conception of basin unity underpinning the cosmovision of the indigenous communities for whom all the waters are part of the salt flat ecosystem (CPA, 2017, p. 10).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites CPA, 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The case of Albemarle provides a good example of how different interpretations of the water/brine divide exist and are discussed within the environmental assessment.

    “The case of Abemarle provides a good example of how different interpretations of the water/brine divide exist and are discussed within the environmental assessment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    However, the environmental management of the operation has not been without its share of problems.

    “However, the environmental management of the operation has not been without its share of problems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The logic and vision that have guided the development of lithium mining in Salar de Atacama basin have begun to be also used in other salt flats.

    “The logic and vision that have guided the development of lithium mining in Salar de Atacama basin have begun to be also used in other salt flats.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The economic agreements have allowed Albemarle to establish an apparently better relationship with the main indigenous organizations than its neighbor SQM.

    “The economic agreements have allowed Albemarle to establish an apparently better relationship with the main indigenous organizations than its neighbor SQM.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    A large part of the salt flats basins would become no-take zones because they correspond to aquifers that feed meadows, peatlands and wetlands declared as threatened, degraded ecosystems or priority sites.

    “a large part of the salt flats basins would become no-take zones because it corresponds to aquifers that feed meadows, peatlands and wetlands declared as threatened, degraded ecosystems or priority sites (Water Code art.63).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Water Code art.63

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    If mineralized groundwaters were legally considered waters, they would be governed by the Water Code and its regulations regardless of their mineral content.

    “If mineralized groundwaters were legally consider waters (as they are terrestrial waters hidden in the bosom of the earth and which have not been illuminated), they would be governed by the Water Code and its regulations regardless of their mineral content (Water Code art. 1 and 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Water Code art. 1 and 2

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The fact that a legal loophole nourishes the current legal treatment of mineralized groundwaters as mineral resource opens the door to alternative interpretations.

    “The fact that a legal loophole nourishes the current legal treatment of mineralized groundwaters as mineral resource opens the door to alternative interpretations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    This no-take measure could be extended to the entire basin for future extraction given prevailing uncertainty about interconnections of groundwater aquifers.

    “This essentially revocable measure could be extended to the entire basin for future extraction given the prevailing uncertainty about the interconnections of groundwater aquifers (Blair et al., 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Blair et al., 2022

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Other general water norms would be directly applicable to brine extraction rights, including regulations on ecosystem preservation, non-extractive rights, reduction of extractions if affecting aquifer sustainability, and brines should be considered as water within strategic plans for water resources in basins.

    “other general water norms would be directly applicable to brine extractions rights, such as regulations on ecosystem preservation, non-extractive rights and reduction of extractions in case of affecting the sustainability of an aquifer (including the declaration of restriction zones), and brines should be considered as water within the strategic plans for water resources in basins (Water Code, art”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Water Code, art 5bis, 5ter, 62-66,129 bis1, 1A and 293bis

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If mineralized groundwaters were legally considered waters, mining projects involving brine extraction would need to obtain water rights and such extractions would be categorized as water resource extraction.

    “mining projects involving brine extraction would need to obtain water rights and such extractions would be categorized as water resource extraction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).

    Interpretationcitation

    The reluctance to legally recognize brines as water is because this would make lithium mining in salt flats unfeasible or very complex.

    “the reluctance to legally recognize brines as water is because this would make the development of lithium mining in salt flats unfeasible or very complex”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites personal communication, senior Lawyer, January 12, 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The interpretation of brines as a type of groundwater is supported by several researchers.

    “The interpretation of brines as a type of (ground)water is supported by several researchers (e.g., Garcés and Álvarez, 2020;Ejeian et al., 2021;Jerez et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Garcés and Álvarez, 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ejeian et al., 2021 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Jerez et al., 2021 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This has made it possible to argue that the extraction of brine does not affect water resources and wetlands part of the salt flat ecosystems and therefore the people and biodiversity that depend on them.

    “This, in turn, has made it possible to argue that the extraction of brine does not affect water resources and wetlands part of the salt flat ecosystems and, therefore, the people and biodiversity that depend on them.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Inaction could mean that the impacts of anthropogenic intervention on these unique ecosystems will continue to be underestimated locally, nationally and globally, masking the unsustainability of extractive operations.

    “inaction could mean that the impacts of anthropogenic intervention on these unique ecosystems will continue to be underestimated locally, nationally and globally, masking the unsustainability of extractive operations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Based mainly on the conception of salt flats' freshwater separated from brines, it is possible to allow brine extraction in basins with deficit water balances as the Salar de Maricunga and generating extreme situations in hydrogeological balances as in the Salar de Atacama.

    “Based mainly on the conception of salt flats' freshwater separated from brines, it is possible to allow brine extraction in basins with deficit water balances as the Salar de Maricunga and generating extreme situations in hydrogeological balances as in the Salar de Atacama (CORFO, 2021;DGA, 2021a).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites CORFO, 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites DGA, 2021a

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The DGA has a structural lack of staffing, financing, information and limited management tools and knowledge of water resources in the country.

    “the DGA who is responsible to manage the water resources according to the Water Code, has a structural lack of staffing, financing, information and limited management tools and knowledge of water resources in the country (World Bank, 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites World Bank, 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A legal recognition of brines as a type of water could contribute to the recognition of indigenous claims and knowledge systems (recognitional justice).

    “It also could contribute to the recognition of indigenous claims and knowledge systems (recognitional justice).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Even though recognizing brines as groundwater could be a minimum starting point for integrated management of salt flats, it would require institutional strengthening and significant advances in information sharing, knowledge and research.

    “even though recognizing brines as groundwater could be a minimum starting point for the integrated management of salt flats, it would require institutional strengthening and significant advances in information sharing, knowledge and research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    ILO Convention 169 is applicable to processes for the constitution of groundwater rights in indigenous territories and areas (at least officially recognized) but not to processes for the constitution of mining concessions.

    “Such convention is applicable to processes for the constitution of groundwater rights in indigenous territories and areas (at least to those officially recognized) (CGR, 2019)-but not to processes for the constitution of mining concessions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites CGR, 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Groundwater and surface water are not managed jointly, and there is scarce control over legal or illegal abstractions.

    “Groundwater and surface water are not managed jointly, and there is scarce control over legal or illegal abstractions (World Bank, 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites World Bank, 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    ILO Convention 169 establishes the duty of States to consult indigenous peoples prior to any legislative or administrative measure that may directly affect them.

    “International Labor Organization (ILO) Convention 169, which establishes the duty of States to consult indigenous peoples prior to any legislative or administrative measure that may directly affect them.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites ILO Convention 169

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A legal recognition of brines as a type of water could contribute to foster the involvement of indigenous groups in decision-making related with lithium mining (representative justice).

    “a legal recognition of brines as type of water could contribute to foster the involvement of indigenous groups in decisionmaking related with lithium mining (representative justice).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    As in Chile, in Argentina and Bolivia mining regulations apply mainly by extension to brine mining, but with greater intervention of the water authority in authorizations for certain cases.

    “As in Chile, mining regulations apply mainly by extension to brine mining, but with greater intervention of the water authority in authorizations for certain cases (Lopez Steinmetz and Fong, 2019;Min. Minería, 2020b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lopez Steinmetz and Fong, 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Min. Minería, 2020b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Legal frameworks play a role in reproducing but also tackling water injustice as they can open up and/or close down spaces of contestation.

    “Legal frameworks play a role in reproducing but also tackling water injustice as they can open up and/or close down spaces of contestation (such as the processes of citizen participation and indigenous consultation in the SEIA).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Brine (as water) escapes singular definitions; it lends itself to be understood as a mineral resource and/or as a type of water or another.

    “brine (as water) escapes singular definitions; it lends itself to be understood as a mineral resource and/or as a type of water or another.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Laws and regulations could be used to support alternative interpretations, for example, using legal coupling to make applicable to brine the rules of the Water Code and groundwater regulations.

    “Laws and regulations could also be used to support alternative interpretations, for example, using legal coupling to make applicable to brine the rules of the Water Code and groundwater regulations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    From a legal perspective, recognizing brine's water character would not require a new law but only a new regulation, which could be introduced by the current government without need for parliamentary approval.

    “From a legal perspective, this would not require a new law but only a new regulation (which could be introduced by the current government without need parliamentary approval).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It could also contribute to address water injustices by fostering involvement of local communities, especially indigenous people and their knowledge systems in decision-making related with lithium mining.

    “It could also contribute to address water injustices by fostering involvement of local communities, especially indigenous people and their knowledge systems in decision-making related with lithium mining.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Defining brines is a highly political process where laws but also knowledge practices-like modeling and legal analysis-play a role.

    “Defining brines is thus a highly political process where laws but also knowledge practices-like modeling and legal analysisplay a role.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This could lead to changes in the hydrosocial understanding of the salt flats including a more holistic conception of water flows above and below the ground.

    “This could lead to changes in the hydrosocial understanding of the salt flats including a more holistic conception of water flows above and below the ground.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    How this type of groundwater is defined, by whom and through what legal frameworks shapes how its flows and the socioecological impacts of lithium mining are understood, assessed, and addressed.

    “how this type of groundwater is defined, by whom and through what legal frameworks shapes how its flows and the socioecological impacts of lithium mining are understood, assessed, and addressed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In Canada, regulations and definitions vary across provinces.

    “in Canada regulations and definitions vary across provinces (Tscherning and Chapman, 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tscherning and Chapman, 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

123 of 123

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many studies have ignored brine because some legal frameworks treat it as a mineral rather than water, and industry actors often externalize brine as separate from surrounding wetlands and aquifers.

    “many studies have ignored brine because some legal frameworks treat it as a mineral rather than water, and industry actors often externalize brine as separate from surrounding wetlands and aquifers”

    From Lithium and water: Hydrosocial impacts across the life cycle of energy storage (2024) · cites this paper as Flores Fernandez & Alba, 2023

    The Case studies and methods section says that treating brine extraction separately from freshwater extraction has kept mineralized groundwater and its interactions with other aquifers out of the Chilean water authority’s studies, models, and water balances. The Conclusion says mining-company studies conceptualize brine and freshwater as separate and use that distinction to argue that brine extraction does not affect wetlands. This supports the claim’s underlying point, but not the broader assertion that many studies have ignored brine altogether. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The 1981 Water Code does not explicitly cover mineralized groundwater-brines as water; therefore, brine is characterized as a mineral in Chile.

    “The 1981 Water Code does not explicitly cover mineralized groundwater-brines as water (Ministerio de Justicia Chile 1981; Tala 1994; Flores Fernández and Alba 2023); therefore, brine is characterized as a mineral in Chile (Ministerio de Mineria 1983; Flores Fernández and Alba 2023).”

    From S-LCA of lithium mining in Chile and its potential impacts on water and the local community (2025) · cites this paper as Flores Fernández and Alba 2023

  • The legal definition of brine affects distributional, procedural, and recognitional justice.

    “The authors concluded that the legal definition of brine affects distributional (e.g., associated with extraction rights), procedural (e.g., the rights that indigenous communities have in decision-making processes regarding brine), and recognitional (e.g., giving legitimate standing to political, social, and cultural positions) justice (Flores Fernández and Alba 2023).”

    From S-LCA of lithium mining in Chile and its potential impacts on water and the local community (2025) · cites this paper as Flores Fernández and Alba 2023

  • Laws governing lithium extraction in Chile have interpreted brine as a mineral resource, and salt flats are regulated mainly as mines, even though they may also be understood as wetlands.

    “laws governing lithium extraction in Chile have interpreted brine as a mineral resource, and salt flats are regulated mainly as mines, even though they may also be understood as wetlands”

    From Lithium and water: Hydrosocial impacts across the life cycle of energy storage (2024) · cites this paper as Flores Fernandez & Alba, 2023

  • To Indigenous Atacameño or Lickanantay people, there is only one water (puri in Kunza) that is alive and includes both brine and surrounding lagoons.

    “To Indigenous Atacameño or Lickanantay people, there is only one water ( puri in Kunza) that is alive and includes both brine and surrounding lagoons”

    From Lithium and water: Hydrosocial impacts across the life cycle of energy storage (2024) · cites this paper as Flores Fernandez & Alba, 2023

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Aylwin, 2013, Los Pueblos Ind
  2. 2017, Proyecto “Conservación de Rutas de Trashumancia y Sitios de Significación Cultural Ind
  3. 2018, Modificación y Texto Refundido de Contrato de Proyecto y de Contrato de Arrendamiento de Pertenencias Mineras OMA, con SQM Salar S.A., SQM S.A. y SQM Potasio S.A.
  4. 2021, Modelo Integrado de Gestión Hídrica de la Cuenca del Salar de Atacama, Octubre
  5. 2018, Recurso de Protección Contra Suscripción de Contratos Que Modifican y Fijan Texto Refundido y Actualizado de Contratos Entre CORFO y SQM
  6. Ferry, 2008, “Timely assets,”, Timely Assets: The Politics of Resources and their Temporalities, 3
  7. Flores Fernández, 2021, “Desposeer para descarbonizar? El avance de la minería de Litio en el Salar de Maricunga, la última frontera del extractivismo verde,”, Salares Andinos. Ecología de Saberes por la Protección de Nuestro Salares y Humedales, 215
  8. Gelles, 2010, “Cultural identity and indigenous water rights in the Andean Highland,”, Out of the Mainstream: Water, Rights, Politics and Identity, 119
  9. Guerra, 2017, Los Tribunales Ambientales en la implementación de los derechos indígenas durante la evaluación ambiental de proyectos de inversión en Chile, Revista Justicia Ambiental, 9, 19
  10. Linton, 2010, What is Water?, The History of a Modern Abstraction
  11. Llagostera, 2004, The ancient inhabitants of the Salar de Atacama, Atacameña Prehistory
  12. Meehan, 2023, Water: A Critical Introduction
  13. Resolución Exenta N
  14. Informe Final Análisis Normativo y Comparado Para la Dictación de un Reglamento de Salmueras
  15. 2021, Salares Andinos. Ecolog
  16. Sandón, 2019, Recurso de Protección contra SEA de la Región de Antofagasta.
  17. 2017, Cuarta Actualización del Modelo Hidrogeológico del Salar de Atacama. Proyecto Cambios y Mejoras de la Operación minera en el Salar de Atacama
  18. Informe de la Sexta Actualización del Modelo Hidrogeológico
  19. Tala, 1994, El estatuto de las aguas mineralizadas. Derecho de Minería o Derecho de Aguas?, Gaceta Jurídica, 164, 41
  20. Yáñez, 2011, Las aguas Ind

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flores Fernández, C., & Alba, R.
Affiliations
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Venue
Frontiers in Water
Published
2023-05-09
Volume
5
ISSN
2624-9375 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4382311556
Cited by
28
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3
FWCI
27.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Water (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Water Governance and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Mining and Resource Management
  • Social Sciences › Law › Environmental law and policy
Keywords
lithium mining, brine, mineralized groundwater, critical legal geography, environmental impact assessment, socio-ecological impacts, lithium demand, electric mobility, Indigenous perspectives, water governance, Chile

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review