Water or mineral resource? Legal interpretations and hydrosocial configurations of lithium mining in Chile
Open accessAbstract
The advance of electromobility has boosted global demand and interest in lithium. The consequent expansion of lithium mining puts the sustainability of Chile's Andean salt flats at risk. In these unique ecosystems, lithium is abstracted from mineralized groundwaters, referred to also as brines. This article analyses the legal treatment of brines and its implications in assessing the socioecological impacts of lithium mining projects. For our analysis, we draw from scholarship at the intersection between hydrosocial research and critical legal geography. Methodologically, our study is based on interviews and the analysis of legal texts and judicial and administrative claims, including the environmental impact assessment studies of the three single lithium mining projects approved in the country. We show that the interpretation of brines as mining resources supported by mining companies and endorsed by environmental State agencies is based on a legal loophole. We document how such interpretation is operationalized and contested in the environmental impact assessments of three mining projects and other instances. We explore how the same legal loophole could lead to alternative interpretations and relatedly regulatory proposals and discuss their implication for the assessment of socioecological impacts of mining projects. These include first an understanding of brines as hybrids minerals/waters put forward in a recent report commissioned by State agencies, and second an interpretation of brines as a type of water. The latter is in line with the position of some indigenous groups and academics. We conclude with reflections on the implications of our analysis for lithium mining in Chile and beyond.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The article argues that Chile’s regulation of lithium brine extraction rests on a legal loophole: brines are treated as mining resources rather than water, enabling lithium projects in Andean salt flats. Through hydrosocial and critical legal geography analysis of three approved projects, it shows how this interpretation is operationalized in environmental assessments and contested by indigenous groups and alternative legal readings.
Key findings
- Chile has no specific legal framework for mineralized groundwaters; mining legislation is extended to salt flats through legal coupling. The Constitution and Mining Code treat salt flats as State mining patrimony, and Mining Code Regulations art. 60 defines salt flats as superficial saline deposits with “occluded saline solutions,” allowing brines to be classified as mining resources rather than water.
- In the environmental impact assessments of the three approved projects—SQM (1,600 l/s brine, 240 l/s freshwater, RCA 226/2006), Albemarle (442 l/s brine, 23.5 l/s freshwater, RCA 21/2016), and MSB’s Proyecto Blanco (209 l/s brine, 35 l/s freshwater, RCA 94/2020)—companies modeled brine aquifers as separated or disconnected from freshwater-brackish aquifers, ruling out or minimizing impacts on water resources, wetlands, and communities. Regulators sometimes contested this, but the interpretation was ultimately endorsed.
- Indigenous groups and some academics contest the brine/water divide, arguing that brine is a type of water and the salt flat is an interconnected ecosystem. A 2020 Ministry of Mining-commissioned report proposed a hybrid interpretation of brines as “mineralized aqueous deposits” and water resources with high salinity, but it remained within mining logic and did not result in regulatory innovation.
- The paper argues that legally recognizing brines as water would trigger the Water Code, including water rights, the “unity of stream” principle, restriction zones, and indigenous consultation under ILO Convention 169, though it notes that DGA institutional weaknesses mean recognition alone would not ensure sustainable or just governance.
Methods
- Qualitative study drawing on hydrosocial research and critical legal geography. The first author conducted 25 interviews in 2021 and 2022 with hydrologists, legal experts, civil society members, and State administration officials, including the Ministry of Mining and the General Directorate of Water (DGA).
- Document review included the Chilean constitution, Chilean and foreign mining and water laws and regulations, judicial and administrative claims, and environmental impact assessment studies for the three single lithium mining projects with an Environmental Qualification Resolution (RCA) authorizing brine extraction: SQM and Albemarle in the Salar de Atacama, and MSB’s Proyecto Blanco in the Salar de Maricunga.
- Analysis focused on how and whether mineralized groundwaters are defined as waters or mineral resources, and how their extraction is related to the extraction of other waters.
Limitations
- The paper states that supporting data are not readily available because of the sensitive nature of the research; it also states that ethical review and written informed consent were not required under national and institutional requirements.
- The paper does not include a dedicated limitations section. Evident from the text, the analysis is limited to three approved lithium projects in Chile and relies on interviews and legal/document review rather than independent hydrogeological measurement or modeling.
- Quotes from Spanish-language documents are the authors’ own translations, and the analysis depends on company, State, and interviewee accounts and documents.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 123 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingcitation
Lithium companies have promoted the legal interpretation of mineralized groundwaters as mining resources by publicly denying their water character.
“Lithium companies have promoted the legal interpretation of mineralized groundwaters as mining resources by publicly denying their water character (SONAMI, 2017; SQM Salar S.A., 2021a, p. 08).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites SONAMI, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites SQM Salar S.A., 2021a
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Mining companies take as reference water quality standards for irrigation water (Chilean norm 1333) and drinking water (Chilean norm 409) that establish maximum concentration limits of 5,000 and 1,500 mg/L respectively.
“Mining companies take as a reference water quality standard for irrigation water (Chilean norm 1333) and drinking water (Chilean norm 409) that establish corresponding maximum concentration limits of 5.000 and 1.500 mg/L respectively (SQM Salar S.A., 2021a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites SQM Salar S.A., 2021a
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingreasoning
However, the decision was later revoked by the national environmental assessment bodies following a complaint filed by the company.
“However, the decision was later revoked by the national environmental assessment bodies following a complaint filed by the company.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Despite recognizing brines as saline groundwater, SQM presented and treated its extractions of brines separately from the extraction of freshwater for mining processes.
“Despite this, SQM presented and treated its extractions of brines separately from the extraction of freshwater for mining processes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
According to RCA 226/2006, SQM could today extract net annual quotas of 1,600 l/s of brine (plus extra quotas for reinjection of waste brine) and 240 l/s of freshwater.
“According to this resolution SQM could today extract net annual quotas of 1,600 l/s of brine (to which are added extra quotas for the reinjection of waste brine) and 240 l/s of freshwater.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingcitation
After three complementary submissions (addenda) the EIA was rejected in 2011 due to deficiencies in the baselines and hydrogeological models presented to identify and estimate impacts.
“After three complementary submissions (addenda) the EIA was rejected in 2011 due to deficiencies in the baselines and hydrogeological models presented to identify and estimate impacts (COREMA II, 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites COREMA II, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingreasoning
Citizen participation in the assessment process was limited.
“It is important to note that citizen participation in the assessment process was limited.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
In March 2022, Albemarle was charged with environmental non-compliance for, among other things, pumping more brine than authorized in its environmental resolutions.
“For instance, in March 2022, Albemarle was charged with environmental non-compliance for, among other things, pumping more brine than authorized in its environmental resolutions (SMA, 2022b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites SMA, 2022b
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
MSB used the thesis of no significant impacts on water resources and systems to rule out impacts on the agricultural and transhumant grazing practices and customs of a large part of the Colla indigenous peoples whose ancestral territories include the Salar de Maricunga and its wetlands.
“MSB used the thesis of no significant impacts on water resources and systems to rule out impacts on the agricultural and transhumant grazing practices and customs of a large part of the Colla indigenous peoples whose ancestral territories include the Salar de Maricunga and its wetlands (CVHNT, 2008;CONADI, 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites CVHNT, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites CONADI, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
The Min.Minería report introduces an exception for joint extraction, allowing the mining concessionaire, administrative concession or CEOL holder to dispose of brines extracted jointly with minerals, subject to common environmental requirements.
“it does introduce an exception for the case of joint extraction (Min.Minería, 2020b, p. 18).”
- Also stated in: § . Alternative legal interpretations of mineralized groundwaters · hedged
“Under this interpretation, the mining concessionaire, administrative concession or CEOL holder could dispose of brines involved in such extraction, having to comply with the common environmental requirements (Min.Minería, 2020b, p. 30-37).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Min.Minería, 2020b
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § . Alternative legal interpretations of mineralized groundwaters · hedged
- Findingreasoning
As a result, brines are treated for all legal purposes as mineral resources and not as waters.
“As a result, brines are treated for all legal proposes as mineral resources and not as waters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
DGA's management in the salt flat basins is carried out in a fragmented manner.
“DGA's management in the salt flat basins is carried out in a fragmented manner.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
In the absence of specific legislation, mining companies and State agencies have extended mining legislation to brines through a process of legal coupling.
“In the absence of specific legislation, mining companies and State agencies have extended mining legislation to brines through a process of legal coupling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
This interpretation has been consolidated through studies developed by mining companies and endorsed by State authorities as part of the environmental impact assessments of mining operations.
“Such interpretation has been consolidated through studies developed by mining companies and endorsed by State authorities as part of the environmental impact assessments of mining operations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
These alternative conceptions remain marginalized at least regarding impact assessments and other formalized water decision-making processes where they are raised.
“these conceptions remain marginalized at least regarding to the impact assessments and other formalized water decision-making processes where they are raised (see DGA, 2021a,b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites DGA, 2021a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites DGA, 2021b
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given
In between, proposals developed for public mining institutions highlight brines' water character by promoting a hybrid interpretation.
“In between, we find proposals developed for public mining institutions highlighting brines' water character by promoting a hybrid interpretation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Alternatively, these conceptions tend to be assimilated into the prevailing approach through corporately driven participatory and consultative mechanisms.
“Alternatively, they tend to be assimilated into the prevailing approach through corporately driven participatory and consultative mechanisms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Constitutional mining norms state that the law defines which substances may be subject to mining concessions and which are reserved for the State.
“Constitutional mining norms added that the law would define which substances may be subject to mining concessions for exploration or exploitation to private parties and which would be reserved for the State (Chilean Constitution, art.19, No. 24, paragraphs 7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chilean Constitution, art.19, No. 24, paragraphs 7
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Lithium has been declared a non-concessionable mineral since 1979.
“Lithium has fallen into this category since 1979 when it was declared as non-concessionable mineral (Decree Law 2.886 art.5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Decree Law 2.886 art.5
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Lithium extraction and exploitation can be carried out only by the State or its companies, under administrative contracts or special lithium operation contracts (CEOLs).
“This means that lithium extraction and exploitation can be carried out only by the State or its companies, under administrative contracts or special lithium operation contracts (CEOLs).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The Water Code does not explicitly recognize mineralized groundwater-brines as waters.
“However, it has been considered that the Water Code does not explicitly recognize mineralized groundwater-brines as waters (Tala, 1994).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tala, 1994
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Chilean mining legislation focuses on static mining deposits and not on liquid ones like mineralized groundwaters.
“Strictly speaking, as suggested by the quote above, mining legislation focuses on static mining deposits and not on liquid ones, like mineralized groundwaters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Min.Minería, 2020b
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
In the absence of dedicated legislation, the current prevailing interpretation extends mining legislation to salt flats and their mineralized groundwaters.
“In the absence of a dedicated legislation, the current prevailing interpretation extend mining legislation to salt flats and their mineralized groundwaters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
According to the Chilean Constitution and Mining Code, salt flats are part of the State mining patrimony.
“According to these regulations, salt flats are part of the State mining patrimony: “the State has absolute, exclusive, inalienable and imprescriptible dominion over all mines, meadows, metalliferous sands, salt flats, coal and hydrocarbon deposits and other fossil substances, except for surface clays” (Chilean Constitution, article 19 No. 24, paragraphs 6 and Mining Code, article 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Chilean Constitution, article 19 No. 24
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Mining Code, article 1
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The normative basis for extending mining legislation to salt flats and mineralized groundwaters is found in the Constitution of 1980 and the 1983 Mining Code.
“The normative basis for this interpretation is found in the norms of the Constitution of 1980 and the 1983 Mining Code.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The absence of explicit recognition of brines as waters in the Water Code has left space for interpretation in regulating mineralized groundwater or brine extraction in salt flats.
“This has left space for interpretation when it comes to the regulation of mineralized groundwater or brine extraction in salt flats.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In Chile, no specific legal framework regulates the extraction and use of minerals like lithium and potassium from mineralized groundwaters.
“In Chile, no specific legal framework regulates the extraction and use of minerals-like lithium and potassium-from mineralized groundwaters (Min.Minería, 2020a,b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Min.Minería, 2020a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Min.Minería, 2020b
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Mining concessions and contracts in Chile include the right to explore or exploit and even evaporate mineralized groundwater from the salt flat they cover.
“the mining concessions and contracts include the right to explore or exploit and even evaporate mineralized groundwater from the salt flat they cover (Tala, 1994, p. 45;Min. Minería, 2020b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Tala, 1994
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Min. Minería, 2020b
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The legal classification and treatment of salt flats as mineral deposits and brines as mining resources has important implications for the (re)configuration of hydrosocial relations.
“A legal classification and treatment of salt flats as mineral deposits and brines as mining resources has important implications in the (re)configuration of hydrosocial relations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Many salt flats are part of ancestral territories of indigenous communities, such as the Atacameño/Lickanantay in the Salar de Atacama or the Colla in the Salar de Maricunga.
“Many salt flats are part of the ancestral territories of indigenous communities, such as the Atacameño/Lickanantay in the Salar de Atacama or the Colla in the Salar de Maricunga (OPSAL, 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites OPSAL, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
The three single lithium mining projects approved in Chile are located in recognized or claimed indigenous territories.
“The projects are located in recognized or claimed indigenous territories.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
The interpretation of brines as mining resources has been historically supported by mining companies and the Chilean State, although with nuances across State institutions.
“Such interpretation has been historically supported by mining companies and the Chilean State-although with some nuances across different State institutions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Salt flats have been fundamental for developing indigenous communities' traditional agricultural and transhumant grazing activities.
“The salt flats have also been fundamental for developing indigenous communities' traditional agricultural and transhumant grazing activities (Castro et al., 2004;Llagostera, 2004;Yáñez and Molina, 2011;Min. Minería, 2015;Prieto, 2015Prieto, , 2016)).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Castro et al., 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Llagostera, 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Yáñez and Molina, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Mining concessions and rights do not preclude the need for specific environmental permits such as the RCA.
“In the Mining concessions and rights do not preclude the need for specific environmental permits such as the RCA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Salt flats constitute integrated salt flat-wetland ecosystems.
“In these terms, the salt flats constitute integrated salt flat-wetland ecosystems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Mining concessions and permits can be granted directly on protected areas or indigenous territories.
“Therefore, they can be granted directly on, for example, protected areas or indigenous territories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In salt flat environments, aquifers of varying salinity are hydrodynamically interrelated, sustaining systems of lagoons, meadows and peatlands (high Andean wetlands).
“In these environments, aquifers of varying salinity are hydrodynamically interrelated, sustaining systems of lagoons, meadows and peatlands (high Andean wetlands), some of which have been recognized as national parks, reserves and Ramsar sites (Dorador et al., 2009(Dorador et al., , 2018;;Thiel et al., 2010;Cubillos et al., 2019;Marazuela et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Once put into practice, the legal definition imposed has allowed its promoters to reconfigure water governance and discipline discourses sustaining the current hydrosocial configuration of salt flat basins.
“Once put into practice, the legal definition imposed has allowed its promoters to (re)configure water governance and the articulation and disciplining of discourses that sustain the current hydrosocial configuration of the salt flat basins.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
The processes for the constitution of strictly mining concessions and permits do not consider environmental aspects, citizen participation or possible indigenous consultation.
“Moreover, it should be noted that the processes for the constitution of strictly mining concessions and permits do not consider environmental aspects, citizen participation or possible indigenous consultation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Legal loopholes and undefined techno-legal frameworks have been used by powerful actors-mining companies-to push forward an interpretation of mineralized groundwaters as mineral resources that underpins an ongoing hydrogeographic reconfiguration.
“We extend the application of such an approach to lithium mining showing how-as for the case of desalination discussed by Campero and Harris (2019)-the existence of legal loopholes and undefined techno-legal frameworks has been used by powerful actors-mining companies-to push forward an interpretation on mineralized groundwaters as mineral resources that underpin an ongoing hydrogeographic reconfig”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Campero and Harris (2019)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The interpretation of brines as mining resources supported by mining companies and endorsed by environmental State agencies is based on a legal loophole.
“We show that the interpretation of brines as mining resources supported by mining companies and endorsed by environmental State agencies is based on a legal loophole.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The extraction of brines from salt flats is managed separately from fresh and lower salinity water extraction, which are categorized and treated as a water resource according to the Water Code.
“A third implication, resulting from the previous one, is that the extraction of brines from salt flats is managed separately from fresh and lower salinity water extraction, which are categorized and treated as a water resource according to the Water Code.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The socioenvironmental impacts of projects are evaluated based on studies prepared and submitted by mining companies for the sole and exclusive purpose of obtaining an environmental license to operate, including hydrological models, simulations and measurements or mathematical calculations.
“A significant difference between assessments, the socioenvironmental impacts of projects are evaluated based on studies prepared and submitted by mining companies for the sole and exclusive purpose of obtaining an environmental license to operate (Broitman and Kreimer, 2018), including hydrological models, simulations and measurements or mathematical calculations (SEA, 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Broitman and Kreimer, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites SEA, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The legal interpretation of brines as mining resources separated from water resources is used and reaffirmed by mining companies in the environmental impact assessments of mining projects.
“As we show below, the legal interpretation of brines as mining resources separates from water resources is used and reaffirmed by mining companies in the environmental impact assessments of mining projects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Despite more than 30 years of continuous exploitation, it is still hard to assess the impacts caused by brine and freshwater extractions on the salt flat ecosystem.
“This implies that, despite more than 30 years of continuous exploitation, it still hard to assess the impacts caused by brine and freshwater extractions on the salt flat ecosystem.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Special protection norms in favor of indigenous ancestral waters and lands, such as pastures, wetlands, meadows and other lands used by auquenid livestock, would be applicable.
“the special protection norms in favor of indigenous ancestral waters and lands, such as pastures, wetlands, meadows and other lands used by auquenid livestock would be applicable (Indigenous Law, art.63, 64, and 3 transitory; Water Code art.5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Indigenous Law, art.63, 64, and 3 transitory
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Water Code art.5
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Salt flats are often located in basins and areas where there are limitations, prohibitions, or restrictions for granting new water use rights.
“salt flats are often located in basins and areas where there are limitations, prohibitions, or restrictions for the granting of new water use rights (Min.Minería, 2020b, p. 23).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Min.Minería, 2020b
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The interpretation of water as brines and application of water-related legislation would have important implications for indigenous peoples.
“The interpretation of water as brines and relatedly, the application of water-related legislation, would have important implications for indigenous peoples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The application of the Water Code in the past has led to cases of water grabbing in favor of most productive uses and to the detriment of local populations, especially indigenous groups, and ecosystems.
“the application of the Water Code in the past has led to cases of water grabbing in favor of most productive uses and to the detriment of the local populations, especially indigenous groups, and ecosystems (Budds, 2009(Budds, , 2010(Budds, , 2020;;Yáñez and Molina, 2011;Prieto, 2015Prieto, , 2016;;Prieto et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Recognizing brines as a type of waters does not in itself ensure more sustainable and just governance of salt flats.
“Importantly, recognizing brines as a type of waters does not in itself ensure more sustainable and just governance of salt flats.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Recent reports indicate that the DGA has not fulfilled its functions of protecting and conserving water resources.
“recent reports indicate that the DGA has not fulfilled its functions of protecting and conserving water resources (CGR, 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites CGR, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Legal coupling is a powerful tool with outcomes that transcend the legal realm and influence environmental impact assessments and ultimately the material practices of lithium extraction.
“As Campero and Harris (2019), we show that legal coupling is a powerful tool with outcomes that transcend the legal realm and influence environmental impact assessments and, ultimately the material practices of lithium extraction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Campero and Harris (2019)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Legal interpretations-and the hydrosocial configurations they underpin-are contestable and contested.
“we show that the legal interpretations-and the hydrosocial configurations they underprint-are contestable and contested.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Environmental participation and indigenous consultation processes in the country have historically been limited in scope.
“environmental participation and indigenous consultation processes in the country have historically been limited in scope (Aylwin et al., 2013;Guerra, 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Aylwin et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Guerra, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The treatment of brines as minerals and the consequent definition of the impacts of their extraction has contributed to excluding and/or co-opting alternative ways of conceiving brines as a type of waters and the salt flat and wetlands as an integrated and interconnected ecosystem.
“The treatment of brines as minerals and the consequent definition of the impacts of their extraction has also contributed to excluding and/or co-opt alternative ways of conceiving brines as a type of waters and the salt flat and wetlands as an integrated and interconnected ecosystem.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Whichever option is finally adopted, socioenvironmental impacts will probably continue to be addressed as externalities to be managed within environmental assessment processes and contracts or agreements between local communities, mining companies and eventually the State leading to the adoption of the social and environmental license.
“Whichever option is finally adopted, socioenvironmental impacts will probably continue to be addressed as externalities to be managed within environmental assessment processes and contracts or agreements between local communities, mining companies and eventually the State leading to the adoption of the social and environmental license.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Although regulatory alternatives on brine count with solid legal basis, introducing an explicit recognition of brine's water character seems (still) far from governmental priorities.
“although regulatory alternatives on brine count with solid legal basis, introducing an explicit recognition of brine's water character seems (still) far from governmental priorities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 102
- May combine two claims. 57
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationIndigenous consultation has begun to be considered in the case of future CEOLs.
“Indigenous consultation, at least, has begun to be considered in the case of future CEOLs (Supreme Court, ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Supreme Court
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThis project was presented in 1994 through an EIA by MINSAL, a company subsequently bought by SQM.
“This project was presented in 1994 through and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) by the Sociedad Minera Salar de Atacama Ltda (MINSAL), company subsequently bought by SQM.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenIn 1996, a new EIA was submitted and SQM obtained an RCA to start lithium carbonate production, authorizing the extraction of 215 l/s gross brine and 22.5 l/s of freshwater.
“In the same year, a new EIA was submitted and SQM obtained an RCA to start lithium carbonate production, authorizing the extraction of 215 l/s gross brine and 22.5 l/s of freshwater.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe first mining project for exploiting mineral groundwaters that entered the SEIA was a potassium chloride production project in the Salar de Atacama.
“The first mining project for exploiting mineral groundwaters that entered the SEIA was a potassium chloride production project in the Salar de Atacama.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningMineralized groundwater and its interactions with lower salinity aquifers have not been subject to greater analysis or integrated into the DGA's studies, models and water balances, an issue that has recently been attempted to be partially rectified, at least for the Salar de Atacama.
“For this reason, mineralized groundwater and its interactions with lower salinity aquifers have not been subject to greater analysis or integrated into the DGA's studies, models and water balances, an issue that has recently been attempted to be partially rectified, at least for the Salar de Atacama (CORFO, 2021; DGA, 2021a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites CORFO, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites DGA, 2021a
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe potassium project was approved in 1995 and subsequently started in 1996.
“The potassium project was approved in 1995 and subsequently started in 1996.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
FindingcitationWater that evaporates after extraction is not considered as part of water consumption by lithium companies, which point out that their operations consume practically no freshwater.
“Thus, water that evaporates after extraction is not considered as part of water consumption by lithium companies, which point out that their operations consume practically no freshwater (SONAMI, 2017; Bustos-Gallardo et al., 2021; SQM Salar S.A., 2021a; Albemarle, n.d., p. 08).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites SONAMI, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bustos-Gallardo et al., 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites SQM Salar S.A., 2021a
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenBetween 1996 and 2005, SQM submitted requests to increase its quotas, obtaining in 2006 the RCA 226/2006.
“Between 1996 and 2005, SQM submitted requests to increase its quotas, obtaining in 2006 the RCA 226/2006.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe interpretation of brines as mining resources separated from water is contested by some indigenous groups and others who support an understanding of brines as (a type of) waters.
“by some indigenous groups and others who rather support an understanding of brines as (a type of) waters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).
FindingcitationMining companies argue that brines are unsuitable for human consumption or activities related to agriculture and livestock.
“Therefore, the argument goes, they are unsuitable for human consumption or activities related to agriculture and livestock (SQM Salar S.A., 2021a; Albemarle, n.d.).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites SQM Salar S.A., 2021a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Albemarle, n.d.
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingcitationMining companies argue that extracted brines cannot be considered water resources because they contain more than 300,000 mg/L of total dissolved solids (TDS; ten times more than seawater).
“In official reports published, mining companies argue that extracted brines cannot be considered water resources because they contain more than 300.000 mg/L of total dissolved solids (TDS; ten times more than seawater).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites SQM Salar S.A., 2021a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Albemarle, n.d.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).
FindingcitationThis was used by SQM to argue that despite the decreases in the water table generated by the brine extraction in the aquifers, neither the water resources nor the natural behavior of the lagoons and wetlands requested quotas would be significantly affected.
“This in turn was used by SQM to argue that despite the decreases in the water table generated by the brine extraction in the aquifers, neither the water resources nor the natural behavior of the lagoons and wetlands requested quotas would be significantly affect (SQM Salar S. A., 2005a, p. 210-216;SQM Salar S.A., 2005b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites SQM Salar S. A., 2005a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites SQM Salar S.A., 2005b
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenWhile mineralized waters are extracted from the core aquifer, freshwaters are extracted from the southwestern aquifers of the salt flat, mainly from the MNT aquifer that sustain the Tilopozo meadows.
“While mineralized waters are extracted from the core aquifer, freshwaters are extracted from the southwestern aquifers of the salt flat, mainly from the Monturaqui-Negrillar-Tilopozo (MNT) aquifer that sustain the Tilopozo meadows.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationAccordingly, the request for extraction of an extra 29 l/s brine quota, totaling 142 l/s, was approved.
“Accordingly, the request for extraction of an extra 29 l/s brine quota, totaling 142 l/s, was approved (RCA 3132/2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites RCA 3132/2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenIn 2016, after cumbersome environmental assessment processes, Albemarle obtained RCA 21/2016 which authorizes it today to extract 442 l/s of brine and 23.5 l/s of freshwater from the salt flat basin.
“In 2016 and after cumbersome environmental assessment processes Albemarle obtained RCA 21/2016 which authorizes it today to extract 442 l/s of brine and 23,5 l/s of freshwater from the salt flat basin.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningBased on this argument it submitted an EIS that was rejected by the environmental authorities.
“Based on this argument it submitted an EIS that was rejected by the environmental authorities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationEnvironmental non-compliance included, among others, the extraction of brine in excess of authorized quotas (3.9%), adverse impacts on protected flora and the non-compliance and modification of monitoring and warning plans without authorization.
“Environmental non-compliance included, among others, the extraction of brine in excess of authorized quotas (3.9%), adverse impacts on protected flora and the non-compliance and modification of monitoring and warning plans without authorization (SMA, 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites SMA, 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe environmental authorities argued that the project was likely to cause significant adverse effects on the quantity and quality of renewable natural resources and thus an EIA should be submitted.
“The latter argued that the project was likely to cause significant adverse effects on the quantity and quality of renewable natural resources and thus a EIA should be submitted (COREMA II, 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites COREMA II, 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingcitationThe EIA refers to data suggesting a limited hydraulic connection between brines and the lagoons.
“The EIA refers to data suggesting a limited hydraulic connection between brines and the lagoons (MINSAL, 1994, p. 185).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites MINSAL, 1994
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenAlbemarle Limitada started its lithium production in the Salar de Atacama in 1984.
“Albemarle Limitada started its lithium production in the Salar de Atacama in 1984.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThe company argued that the predicted decline of <10 cm in 25 years would not imply a considerable loss in the amount of ecological soil capable of providing habitat for the biodiversity that inhabits the ecosystems.
“The company argued that the predicted decline-of <10 cm in 25 years-would not imply a considerable loss in the amount of ecological soil capable of providing habitat for the biodiversity that inhabits the ecosystems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe division between the water and brine aquifers has been discussed in recent years as part of the auditing and sanction processes started by the SMA against SQM.
“The division between the water and brine aquifers has been discussed in recent years as part of the auditing and sanction processes started by the Superintendency of the Environment, SMA, against SQM.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationAs part of the auditing process, it was recognized that there is a high degree of scientific uncertainty regarding the hydrodynamic behavior of the salt flat and a lack of information regarding its hydrogeological functioning and water balance.
“Importantly, as part of the auditing process, it was recognized that there is a high degree of scientific uncertainty regarding the hydrodynamic behavior of the salt flat and a lack of information regarding its hydrogeological functioning and water balance (First Environmental Court, 2019; see also Amphos21, 2018, p. 321;ff and DGA, 2021a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites First Environmental Court, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Amphos21, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites DGA, 2021a
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingcitationThe EIA reaffirmed the disconnections between brine aquifers and less saline aquifers by a barrier of low hydraulic conductivity.
“The EIA reaffirmed the disconnections between brine aquifers and less saline aquifers-by a barrier of low hydraulic conductivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationThe numerical modeling presented to calculate the water balance and fluid flow indicated that the extractions requested would have a slight impact on the lagoon's groundwater table (phreatic level).
“Building on this, the numerical modeling presented to calculate the water balance and fluid flow indicated that the extractions requested would have a slight impact on the lagoon's groundwater table (phreatic level).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThese extractions are carried out from aquifers that feed or are connected to lagoons and wetlands located on the eastern edge of the salt flat, part of which are included in the Los Flamencos National Reserve and Ramsar Site Soncor.
“These extractions are carried out from aquifers that feed or are connected to lagoons and wetlands located on the eastern edge of the salt flat, part of which are included in the Los Flamencos National Reserve and Ramsar Site Soncor.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThese processes summarize recent investigation by the SMA on the operation of SQM carried out after repeated environmental and contractual breaches, and illegal political financing of SQM became known.
“These processes summarize recent investigation by the SMA on the operation of SQM carried out after repeated environmental and contractual breaches, and illegal political financing of SQM became known (Poveda, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Poveda, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationWhile Albemarle considers brine separately from water, (part of) the environmental authorities consider mineralized groundwaters as water in their own right to weigh the impacts of their extraction.
“While Albemarle considers brine separately from water, (part of) the environmental authorities consider mineralized groundwaters as water in their own right to weigh the impacts of their extraction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationNevertheless, the project was revived by filing an appeal for reconsideration, leading to the submission of two new addenda, halving the requested brine quota increase to 300 l/s.
“Nevertheless, the project was revived by filing an appeal for reconsideration (SCL, 2011), leading to the submission of two new addenda, halving the requested brine quota increase to 300 l/s.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites SCL, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenGroups such as the Atacameño/Lickanantay indigenous communities of Peine, Toconao and Socaire attempted to question the company's position on the impacts and meaning, and functioning of the salt flat and its multiple waters, but their comments were not included due to formal reasons.
“Indeed, groups such as the Atacameño/Lickanantay indigenous communities of Peine, Toconao and Socaire attempted to question the company's position on the impacts and meaning, and functioning of the salt flat and its multiple waters.Still, their comments were not included due to formal reasons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationAccording to these assumptions, the company postulated that the project and its new extraction quotas would not generate significant adverse social or environmental impact.
“According to these assumptions, the company postulated that the project and its new extraction quotas would not generate significant adverse social or environmental impact (SQM Salar S. A., 2005a, p. 37-39).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites SQM Salar S. A., 2005a
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenEventually, SQM obtained the RCA 226/2006 authorizing its current extraction quotas, whose maintenance and management have involved subsequent updates of hydrogeological modeling initially presented.
“Eventually, SQM obtained the RCA 226/2006 authorizing its current extraction quotas, whose maintenance and management have involved subsequent updates of hydrogeological modeling initially presented.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingcitationThe techno-scientific and legal conceptualizations that separate mineralized groundwater and water have been challenged by the CPA.
“The techno-scientific and legal conceptualizations that separate mineralized groundwater and water have been challenged by the CPA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe CPA intervened both in the sanctioning procedure against SQM and in the claims filed against the agreement that CORFO signed with SQM in 2018 to continue exploiting the salt flat.
“The CPA intervened both in the sanctioning procedure against SQM and in the claims filed against the agreement that CORFO signed with SQM in 2018 to continue exploiting the salt flat.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenLater, in 2009, Albemarle sought to increase its brine quota by 600 l/s as an annual average by submitting an EIA.
“Later, in 2009, Albemarle sought to increase its brine quota by 600 l/s as an annual average by submitting an EIA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenIn 2004 and 2009 the company requested to increase its brine extraction quota, first through an EIS and then through an EIA.
“Subsequently, in 2004 and2009 the company requested to increase its brine extraction quota, first through an EIS and then through an EIA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe company ruled out that its operations would significantly impact water resources (lagoon waters and not brines), biodiversity and the traditional agricultural and livestock livelihoods of members of the Atacameño/Lickanantay ethnic group settled east of the salt flat.
“Hence, the company ruled out that its operations would significantly impact water resources-here referring to lagoon waters and not to brines-biodiversity and the traditional agricultural and livestock livelihoods of members of the Atacameño/Lickanantay ethnic group settled east of the salt flat (MINSAL, 1994, p. 187).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites MINSAL, 1994
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThese facilities, initially operated by SCL and then Rockwood, entered the SEIA system for the first time in 2000 through an EIS, obtaining the environmental authorization to pump 113 l/s of mineralized groundwater in the RCA 092/2000.
“These facilities, initially operated by Sociedad Chilena del Litio (SCL) and then Rockwood, entered the SEIA system for the first time in 2000 through an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), obtaining the environmental authorization to pump 113 l/s of mineralized groundwater in the RCA 092/2000 (Rockwood, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rockwood, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingreasoningThese aquifers were conceptualized in the hydrological models as disconnected from the shallow saline aquifers that support the socio-hydrological system of the Salar de Maricunga due to the presence of a clay hydrogeological structure.
“These aquifers were conceptualized in the hydrological models as disconnected from the shallow saline aquifers that support the socio-hydrological system of the Salar de Maricunga due to the presence of a clay hydrogeological structure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
FindingcitationBased on this conceptualization of confined aquifers, MSB ruled out the generation of significant environmental effects on the water resource, loss of wetland vegetation, endemic flora, and in general, on the aquatic ecosystems associated with the protected areas of the salt flat belonging to the Nevado Tres Cruces National Park and the Ramsar site Complejo Lagunar Francisco and Laguna Santa Rosa.
“Based on this conceptualization of confined aquifers, MSB ruled out the generation of significant environmental effects on the water resource, loss of wetland vegetation, endemic flora, and in general, on the aquatic ecosystems associated with the protected areas of the salt flat belonging to the Nevado Tres Cruces National Park and the Ramsar site Complejo Lagunar Francisco and Laguna Santa Rosa”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites MSB, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites SEA, 2020a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites SEA, 2020b
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationThe RCAs of Albemarle and SQM and the commitments established therein are concatenated (e.g., the execution of their monitoring and warning plans are conditioned to those of the other company).
“It is important to keep in mind that the RCAs of Albemarle and SQM and the commitments established therein are concatenated (e.g., the execution of their monitoring and warning plans are conditioned to those of the other company) (DGA, 2021a, p. 133).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites DGA, 2021a
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingcitationAccording to previous studies by the DGA to determine water availability, the salt flat basin had a water demand balance deficit of -344 l/s.
“According to previous studies by the DGA to determinate water availability, the salt flat basin had a water demand balance deficit of -344 l/s (DGA, 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites DGA, 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe project involves the extraction of 209 l/s of brine and 35 l/s of freshwater to feed the industrial processes, both to be pumped from the Salar de Maricunga basin.
“The project involves the extraction of 209 l/s of brine and 35 l/s of freshwater to feed the industrial processes, both to be pumped from the Salar de Maricunga basin (SEA, 2020a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites SEA, 2020a
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationIn the same month, the State filed a lawsuit for environmental damage against Albemarle and two other companies that extracted water from the MNT aquifer.
“In the same month, the State filed a lawsuit for environmental damage against Albemarle and two other companies that extracted water from the MNT aquifer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningTherefore, the open indigenous consultation only considered this community, excluding those directly related to the salt flat basin.
“Therefore, the open indigenous consultation only considered this community, excluding those directly related to the salt flat basin (MSB, 2018;SEA, 2020a,b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites MSB, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites SEA, 2020a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites SEA, 2020b
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAs a result, these indigenous groups supported the project, which was approved by RCA 21/2016.
“As a result, these indigenous groups supported the project, which was approved by RCA 21/2016.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe lawsuit denounced that the extractions generated a decrease in the water level above what was environmentally permitted and affecting the Tilopozo meadows.
“The lawsuit denounced that the extractions generated a decrease in the water level above what was environmentally permitted and affecting the Tilopozo meadows (CDE, 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites CDE, 2022
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingcitationThe company's studies indicated that the Colla settlements, lands, waters and transhumant routes were located far from the project works and outside the area of influence defined for impact on human groups which excluded the salt flat and wetlands.
“The company's studies indicated that the Colla settlements, lands, waters and transhumant routes were located far from the project works and outside the area of influence defined for impact on human groups which excluded the salt flat and wetlands (MSB, 2018;SEA, 2020b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites MSB, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites SEA, 2020b
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn these addenda, the company presented evidence based on a new hydrological model that considered a semi-impermeable saline interface between brine aquifers and freshwater-saline ones; this structure would physically separate the core brine and the freshwater-saline aquifer that feeds the lagoons and wetlands.
“In these addenda, the company presented evidence based on a new hydrological model that considered a semi-impermeable saline interface between brine aquifers and freshwater-saline ones.This structure would physically separate the core brine and the freshwater-saline aquifer that feeds the lagoons and wetlands (Rockwood, 2014(Rockwood, , 2015)).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Rockwood, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rockwood, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationIn the context of the lawsuit, Albemarle offered to stop using its water rights from MNT (18.5 l/s of the 23.5 l/s authorized in RCA 21/2016).
“In the context of the lawsuit, Albemarle offered to stop using its water rights from MNT (18.5 l/s of the 23.5 l/s authorized in RCA 21/2016) (Albemarle, 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Albemarle, 2023
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe new studies and hydrogeological models concluded that the requested increase in extraction would not generate adverse impacts on the lagoon and aquifer systems of the salt flats, and on the life systems and customs of the groups living in the basin.
“The new studies and hydrogeological models concluded that the requested increase in extraction would not generate adverse impacts on the lagoon and aquifer systems of the salt flats, and on the life systems and customs of the groups living in the basin.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThis situation occurs in a general scenario where the functioning, evolution and water health of the lagoon systems, meadows, peatlands and native species are unknown, as well as the impacts that the extraction of freshwater and brine generate on them and the entire Salar de Atacama basin.
“This situation occurs in a general scenario where the functioning, evolution and water health of the lagoon systems, meadows, peatlands and native species are unknown, as well as the impacts that the extraction of freshwater and brine generate on them and the entire Salar de Atacama basin (DGA, 2021a, p. 274-276, 300).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites DGA, 2021a
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingcitationWithin the EIA process, different interpretations of brines were put forward.
“Within the EIA process, different interpretations of brines were put forward.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationThe mining company dealt with these concerns by establishing agreements with Atacameño/Lickanantay community of Peine and the CPA and thus ruling out adverse impacts on them.
“The mining company dealt with these concerns by establishing agreements with Atacameño/Lickanantay community of Peine and the CPA and thus ruling out adverse impacts on them (Rockwood, 2015, p. 151-153).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rockwood, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThus, MSB concluded that the project would only affect the transhumance practices of specific members of the Colla Community of Diego de Almagro due to the increased traffic generated by the operation of the project on surrounding routes.
“Thus, MSB concluded that the project would only affect the transhumance practices of specific members of the Colla Community of Diego de Almagro due to the increased traffic generated by the operation of the project on surrounding routes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe Min.Minería report recognizes interaction and interdependence between waters and brines, requiring brine extraction operations to be registered in the DGA's public water cadastre.
“The report recognizes a degree of interaction and interdependence between waters and brines requiring brine extraction operations to be registered in the DGA's public water founded”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Min.Minería, 2020b
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenSeveral administrative and judicial appeals were filed for the annulment of the RCA, alleging the unfounded exclusion of significant impacts and indigenous communities in the consultation process, among other infractions.
“Several administrative and judicial appeals were filed for the annulment of the RCA, alleging the unfounded exclusion of significant impacts and indigenous communities in the consultation process, among other infractions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenExcept for one claim still pending, all the appeals have been dismissed to date.
“Nevertheless, except for one claim still pending, all the appeals have been dismissed to date.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenDespite the multiple observations, the SEA favorably qualified the project on 04 February 2020 through RCA No. 94/2020 endorsing the company's studies and assessments.
“Despite the multiple observations, the SEA favorably qualified the project on 04 February 2020 through RCA No. 94/2020 endorsing the company's studies and assessments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe information contained in the EIA and subsequent addenda was the subject of multiple requests for clarification, rectification or additions by sectorial bodies and observations made within the citizen participation instances.
“The information contained in the EIA and subsequent addenda was the subject of multiple requests for clarification, rectification or additions by sectorial bodies and observations made within the citizen participation instances.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe proposed regulation's hybrid water/brine interpretation does not entail restrictions or prohibitions for granting extraction quotas in basins or degraded or environmentally valuable areas, nor prior integrated management of the basin, nor greater participation or consideration of local communities' water uses and visions.
“Although it proposes a hybrid water/brine interpretation, it does not entail restrictions or prohibitions for granting extraction quotas in basins or degraded or environmentally valuable areas, a previous understanding and integrated management of the basin, nor greater participation or consideration of water uses and visions of local communities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationThey also indicated that the EIA lacked essential information to analyze the impacts generated by the affectation of groundwater flows on the lagoon and wetlands present in the National Park and the Ramsar Site and their characteristic flora and fauna, such as flamingos, vicuñas and guanacos' population.
“They also indicate that the EIA lacked essential information to analyze the impacts generated by the affectation of groundwater flows on the lagoon and wetlands present in the National Park and the Ramsar Site and their characteristic flora and fauna, such as flamingos, vicuñas and guanacos' population (DGA, 2018a(DGA, , 2019)).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites DGA, 2018a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites DGA, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingcitationIn July 2020, the Ministry of Mining commissioned a study for the elaboration of a regulation for the extraction and use of brines located for mining purposes.
“In July 2020, the Ministry of Mining commissioned a study for the elaboration of a regulation for the extraction and use of brines located for mining purposes (Min.Minería, 2020a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Min. Minería, 2020a
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationSpecific objectives of the study included defining the legal nature of mineralized groundwaters, the permits required for their extraction and its treatment in relation to other water sources present in a specific site.
“Specific objectives of the study included defining the legal nature of mineralized groundwaters, the permits required for their extraction and its treatment in relation to other water sources present in a specific site (Min.Minería, 2020a, p. 36).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Min. Minería, 2020a
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationIndigenous groups also intervened to question how MSB defined the impacts of the project.
“Indigenous groups also intervened to question how MSB defined the impacts of the project.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationSernageomin and the DGA questioned the central hypothesis of the models, which consisted of the supposed disconnection between the deep brine aquifer and the shallow aquifer.
“Among others, the Geology and Mining Service (Sernageomin) and the DGA questioned the central hypothesis of the models, which consisted of the supposed disconnection between the deep brine aquifer and the shallow aquifer (Sernageomin, 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sernageomin, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe proposed regulation did not result in regulatory innovations and remained unknown to current governmental authorities such as the Ministry of Mining itself (at least until the 2022 interviews).
“At the end, the proposal did not result in regulatory innovations and remained unknown to the current governmental authorities such as the Ministry of Mining itself (at least until the date of the interviews in 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningWhile mining companies back the interpretation of brine as a mineral and build a particular understanding of hydrosocial relations in the Salar de Atacama and Maricunga, indigenous groups put forward different understandings of brine as a type of water.
“While mining companies back the interpretation of brine as a mineral and on this, they build a particular understanding of hydrosocial relations in the Salar de Atacama and Maricunga, indigenous groups put forward different understandings of brine as a type of water.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
FindingreasoningIn these studies, brines and freshwaters of the salt flats are conceptualized as separate entities on scientific grounds that are currently the subject of intense scrutiny.
“In these studies, brines and freshwaters of the salt flats are conceptualized as separate entities on scientific grounds that are currently the subject of intense scrutiny.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationEven though the general water balances of the basins are in deficit, limitations have only been introduced reactively without preventing overexploitation and environmental damage to local ecosystems.
“even though the general water balances of the basins are in deficit, limitations have only been introduced reactively without preventing overexploitation and environmental damage to local ecosystems (DGA, 2018b(DGA, , 2021a;;Babidge et al., 2019;CDE, 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites DGA, 2018b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites DGA, 2021a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Babidge et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingreasoningThe focus of the debate tends to be on the appropriate business model to push forward and expand lithium mining in the short and medium term and take advantage of the boom in price and demand at almost any cost.
“the focus of the debate tends to be on the appropriate business model to push forward and expand lithium mining in the short and medium term and take advantage of the boom in price and demand at almost any cost.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningAlthough creating a strong State-owned company was one of the campaign banners of the current government, more expeditious public-private partnership modalities close to those currently operating are gaining greater importance within the non-participatory, announced and delayed new National Lithium Strategy.
“although creating a strong State-owned company was one of the campaign banners of the current government, more expeditious public-private partnership modalities close to those currently operating are gaining greater importance within the non-participatory, announced and delayed new National Lithium Strategy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenTo date, the only special lithium operation contract (CEOL) is the one signed with the subsidiary of the State-owned company CODELCO for projects in the Salar de Maricunga.
“To date, the only special lithium operation contract (CEOL) is the one signed in with the subsidiary of the State-owned company CODELCO for projects in the Salar de Maricunga (currently in the exploratory stage).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenTwo tenders were awarded to enter CEOLs with the State but were overturned by the Supreme Court.
“Two tenders were awarded in to enter CEOLs with the State but were overturned by the Supreme Court in .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationMineralized groundwater could be defined as "occluded saline solutions" (not as water resources) and as a constituent part of the salt flat, and therefore as a mining resource within mining deposits.
“Thus, mineralized groundwater could be defined as “occluded saline solutions” (not as water resources) and as constituent part of the salt flat being, therefore, a mining resource within mining deposits (Min.Minería, 2020a, p. 36;Min. Minería, 2020b, p. 13, 32).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Min.Minería, 2020a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Min. Minería, 2020b
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
PremisecitationFor commercial purposes, the Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission (CCHEN) must have previously approved marketing lithium quotas according to DL and Law No.
“For commercial proposes, the Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission (CCHEN) must also have previously approved marketing lithium quotas according to DL .and Law No. . .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites DL
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Law No.
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationSalt flats could be understood as another type of static mining deposit.
“In this sense, salt flats could be understood as another type of static mining deposit (Tala, 1994, p. 45;Min. Minería, 2020b, p. 5;Jerez et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Tala, 1994
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Min. Minería, 2020b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Jerez et al., 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningAs groundwaters, mineralized groundwaters should in principle be governed by the Water Code, which applies indistinctly to all terrestrial surface and groundwater.
“At the same time, as groundwaters, in principle, they should be governed by the Water Code, which stipulates that its provisions apply indistinctly to all terrestrial waters, both surface and groundwater.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationRecent reports commissioned by the Ministry of Mining indicate the eminently "mining nature" of brines, linked to the Mining Code Regulations (art. 60) defining salt flat as a superficial saline deposit with occluded saline solutions.
“Specifically, the eminently “mining nature” of brines has been indicated by recent reports commissioned by the Ministry of Mining as linked to the provision contained in the Mining Code Regulations (art.60), which define salt flat as “a superficial saline deposit, consisting of a saline crust of variable thickness, with occluded saline solutions (. . .)” (Min.Minería, 2020b, p. 13).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Min.Minería, 2020b
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe State has ownership of salt flats and their mineralized groundwaters and may grant mining concessions, administrative contracts, CEOLs, or explore and exploit them directly or through its companies depending on the mineral substances to be obtained.
“First, the State has ownership on salt flats and its mineralized groundwaters and may grant mining concessions, administrative contracts, CEOLs or explore and exploit them directly or through its companies depending on the mineral substances to be obtained.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationProjects for the exploitation of lithium and other mineral substances must enter the SEIA based on the typology of mining projects and the amount of brine extracted (classified as a mineral by the SEA).
“According to the SEA, projects for the exploitation of lithium and other mineral substances must enter the SEIA based on the typology of mining projects and the amount of brine extracted (classified as a mineral by the SEA) (SEA, 2021, p. 15).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites SEA, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe SEIA was established in the Environmental Basis Law (EBL).
“The SEIA was established in the Environmental Basis Law (EBL) of .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSalt flats are fragile ecosystems characterized by unique biodiversity, including birds in conservation categories and benthonic microorganisms fundamental to trophic chains.
“Salt flats are fragile ecosystems characterized by unique biodiversity, including birds in the conservation category, such as flamingos, and benthonic microorganisms fundamental to the tropic chains.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningSince the entry into force of the SEIA, environmental permits must be obtained before the construction and operation of mining projects.
“Since the entry into force of the SEIA, these permits must be obtained before the construction and operation of the projects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCitizen participation processes are mandatory for EIAs and eventual for EISs.
“EIA and EIS is that citizen participation processes are mandatory for the former.For the latter, they are eventual.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites EBL
Not checked in the free run.
- cites SEIA Regulation
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBy not applying water law restriction, permits to extract and consume brine may be obtained in basins with insufficient water balances, and they may also not be declared as depleted or areas prohibited for the constitution of water rights.
“By not applying water law restriction, permits to extract and consume brine may be obtained in basins with insufficient water balances.They may also not be declared as depleted or areas prohibited for the constitution of water rights.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenIf the presented information is approved, the projects obtain their environmental license (RCA).
“If the presented information is approved, the projects obtain his environmental license (RCA).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe EIA applies to projects that potentially involve health risks, adverse effects on renewable natural resources, resettlement or significant impacts on the living environment and customs of people, and if they are in the vicinity of populations, resources and protected areas; when projects do not generate these effects, an EIS can be submitted.
“The EIA applies to projects that potentially involve, among others, health risks, adverse effects on renewable natural resources, resettlement or significant impacts on the living environment and customs of people and if they are in the vicinity of populations, resources and protected areas.When projects do not generate these effects, an EIS can be submitted.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Environmental Basis Law
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenOnly after the EBL did projects begin to be environmentally evaluated, which became mandatory with the entry into force of its regulations; during the interim period, entry to the SEIA was voluntary.
“Only after that date did projects begin to be environmentally evaluated, which became mandatory with the entry into force of its regulations in .During the interim period, entry to the SEIA was voluntary.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe CPA argues that the PdC was based on a conceptual model that assumes hydraulic independence between the core of the salt flat and the lagoon systems of the marginal zone, without a robust scientific basis.
“Among other issues, the CPA argues that the PdC was based on a conceptual model that assumes hydraulic independence between the core of the salt flat and the lagoon systems of the marginal zone, without a robust scientific basis (CPA, 2022, p. 49).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites CPA, 2022
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationThis interpretation of brine as nonwater and as brines as separated from other waters opposes the conception of basin unity underpinning the cosmovision of the indigenous communities for whom all the waters are part of the salt flat ecosystem.
“This interpretation of brine as nonwater and as brines as separated from other waters opposes the conception of basin unity underpinning the cosmovision of the indigenous communities for whom all the waters are part of the salt flat ecosystem (CPA, 2017, p. 10).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites CPA, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe case of Albemarle provides a good example of how different interpretations of the water/brine divide exist and are discussed within the environmental assessment.
“The case of Abemarle provides a good example of how different interpretations of the water/brine divide exist and are discussed within the environmental assessment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationHowever, the environmental management of the operation has not been without its share of problems.
“However, the environmental management of the operation has not been without its share of problems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe logic and vision that have guided the development of lithium mining in Salar de Atacama basin have begun to be also used in other salt flats.
“The logic and vision that have guided the development of lithium mining in Salar de Atacama basin have begun to be also used in other salt flats.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe economic agreements have allowed Albemarle to establish an apparently better relationship with the main indigenous organizations than its neighbor SQM.
“The economic agreements have allowed Albemarle to establish an apparently better relationship with the main indigenous organizations than its neighbor SQM.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationA large part of the salt flats basins would become no-take zones because they correspond to aquifers that feed meadows, peatlands and wetlands declared as threatened, degraded ecosystems or priority sites.
“a large part of the salt flats basins would become no-take zones because it corresponds to aquifers that feed meadows, peatlands and wetlands declared as threatened, degraded ecosystems or priority sites (Water Code art.63).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Water Code art.63
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationIf mineralized groundwaters were legally considered waters, they would be governed by the Water Code and its regulations regardless of their mineral content.
“If mineralized groundwaters were legally consider waters (as they are terrestrial waters hidden in the bosom of the earth and which have not been illuminated), they would be governed by the Water Code and its regulations regardless of their mineral content (Water Code art. 1 and 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Water Code art. 1 and 2
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe fact that a legal loophole nourishes the current legal treatment of mineralized groundwaters as mineral resource opens the door to alternative interpretations.
“The fact that a legal loophole nourishes the current legal treatment of mineralized groundwaters as mineral resource opens the door to alternative interpretations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThis no-take measure could be extended to the entire basin for future extraction given prevailing uncertainty about interconnections of groundwater aquifers.
“This essentially revocable measure could be extended to the entire basin for future extraction given the prevailing uncertainty about the interconnections of groundwater aquifers (Blair et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Blair et al., 2022
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationOther general water norms would be directly applicable to brine extraction rights, including regulations on ecosystem preservation, non-extractive rights, reduction of extractions if affecting aquifer sustainability, and brines should be considered as water within strategic plans for water resources in basins.
“other general water norms would be directly applicable to brine extractions rights, such as regulations on ecosystem preservation, non-extractive rights and reduction of extractions in case of affecting the sustainability of an aquifer (including the declaration of restriction zones), and brines should be considered as water within the strategic plans for water resources in basins (Water Code, art”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Water Code, art 5bis, 5ter, 62-66,129 bis1, 1A and 293bis
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIf mineralized groundwaters were legally considered waters, mining projects involving brine extraction would need to obtain water rights and such extractions would be categorized as water resource extraction.
“mining projects involving brine extraction would need to obtain water rights and such extractions would be categorized as water resource extraction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).
InterpretationcitationThe reluctance to legally recognize brines as water is because this would make lithium mining in salt flats unfeasible or very complex.
“the reluctance to legally recognize brines as water is because this would make the development of lithium mining in salt flats unfeasible or very complex”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites personal communication, senior Lawyer, January 12, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe interpretation of brines as a type of groundwater is supported by several researchers.
“The interpretation of brines as a type of (ground)water is supported by several researchers (e.g., Garcés and Álvarez, 2020;Ejeian et al., 2021;Jerez et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis has made it possible to argue that the extraction of brine does not affect water resources and wetlands part of the salt flat ecosystems and therefore the people and biodiversity that depend on them.
“This, in turn, has made it possible to argue that the extraction of brine does not affect water resources and wetlands part of the salt flat ecosystems and, therefore, the people and biodiversity that depend on them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningInaction could mean that the impacts of anthropogenic intervention on these unique ecosystems will continue to be underestimated locally, nationally and globally, masking the unsustainability of extractive operations.
“inaction could mean that the impacts of anthropogenic intervention on these unique ecosystems will continue to be underestimated locally, nationally and globally, masking the unsustainability of extractive operations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationBased mainly on the conception of salt flats' freshwater separated from brines, it is possible to allow brine extraction in basins with deficit water balances as the Salar de Maricunga and generating extreme situations in hydrogeological balances as in the Salar de Atacama.
“Based mainly on the conception of salt flats' freshwater separated from brines, it is possible to allow brine extraction in basins with deficit water balances as the Salar de Maricunga and generating extreme situations in hydrogeological balances as in the Salar de Atacama (CORFO, 2021;DGA, 2021a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites CORFO, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites DGA, 2021a
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe DGA has a structural lack of staffing, financing, information and limited management tools and knowledge of water resources in the country.
“the DGA who is responsible to manage the water resources according to the Water Code, has a structural lack of staffing, financing, information and limited management tools and knowledge of water resources in the country (World Bank, 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites World Bank, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningA legal recognition of brines as a type of water could contribute to the recognition of indigenous claims and knowledge systems (recognitional justice).
“It also could contribute to the recognition of indigenous claims and knowledge systems (recognitional justice).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEven though recognizing brines as groundwater could be a minimum starting point for integrated management of salt flats, it would require institutional strengthening and significant advances in information sharing, knowledge and research.
“even though recognizing brines as groundwater could be a minimum starting point for the integrated management of salt flats, it would require institutional strengthening and significant advances in information sharing, knowledge and research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationILO Convention 169 is applicable to processes for the constitution of groundwater rights in indigenous territories and areas (at least officially recognized) but not to processes for the constitution of mining concessions.
“Such convention is applicable to processes for the constitution of groundwater rights in indigenous territories and areas (at least to those officially recognized) (CGR, 2019)-but not to processes for the constitution of mining concessions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites CGR, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGroundwater and surface water are not managed jointly, and there is scarce control over legal or illegal abstractions.
“Groundwater and surface water are not managed jointly, and there is scarce control over legal or illegal abstractions (World Bank, 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites World Bank, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationILO Convention 169 establishes the duty of States to consult indigenous peoples prior to any legislative or administrative measure that may directly affect them.
“International Labor Organization (ILO) Convention 169, which establishes the duty of States to consult indigenous peoples prior to any legislative or administrative measure that may directly affect them.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites ILO Convention 169
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningA legal recognition of brines as a type of water could contribute to foster the involvement of indigenous groups in decision-making related with lithium mining (representative justice).
“a legal recognition of brines as type of water could contribute to foster the involvement of indigenous groups in decisionmaking related with lithium mining (representative justice).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAs in Chile, in Argentina and Bolivia mining regulations apply mainly by extension to brine mining, but with greater intervention of the water authority in authorizations for certain cases.
“As in Chile, mining regulations apply mainly by extension to brine mining, but with greater intervention of the water authority in authorizations for certain cases (Lopez Steinmetz and Fong, 2019;Min. Minería, 2020b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lopez Steinmetz and Fong, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Min. Minería, 2020b
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLegal frameworks play a role in reproducing but also tackling water injustice as they can open up and/or close down spaces of contestation.
“Legal frameworks play a role in reproducing but also tackling water injustice as they can open up and/or close down spaces of contestation (such as the processes of citizen participation and indigenous consultation in the SEIA).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBrine (as water) escapes singular definitions; it lends itself to be understood as a mineral resource and/or as a type of water or another.
“brine (as water) escapes singular definitions; it lends itself to be understood as a mineral resource and/or as a type of water or another.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenLaws and regulations could be used to support alternative interpretations, for example, using legal coupling to make applicable to brine the rules of the Water Code and groundwater regulations.
“Laws and regulations could also be used to support alternative interpretations, for example, using legal coupling to make applicable to brine the rules of the Water Code and groundwater regulations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenFrom a legal perspective, recognizing brine's water character would not require a new law but only a new regulation, which could be introduced by the current government without need for parliamentary approval.
“From a legal perspective, this would not require a new law but only a new regulation (which could be introduced by the current government without need parliamentary approval).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningIt could also contribute to address water injustices by fostering involvement of local communities, especially indigenous people and their knowledge systems in decision-making related with lithium mining.
“It could also contribute to address water injustices by fostering involvement of local communities, especially indigenous people and their knowledge systems in decision-making related with lithium mining.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningDefining brines is a highly political process where laws but also knowledge practices-like modeling and legal analysis-play a role.
“Defining brines is thus a highly political process where laws but also knowledge practices-like modeling and legal analysisplay a role.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThis could lead to changes in the hydrosocial understanding of the salt flats including a more holistic conception of water flows above and below the ground.
“This could lead to changes in the hydrosocial understanding of the salt flats including a more holistic conception of water flows above and below the ground.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningHow this type of groundwater is defined, by whom and through what legal frameworks shapes how its flows and the socioecological impacts of lithium mining are understood, assessed, and addressed.
“how this type of groundwater is defined, by whom and through what legal frameworks shapes how its flows and the socioecological impacts of lithium mining are understood, assessed, and addressed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn Canada, regulations and definitions vary across provinces.
“in Canada regulations and definitions vary across provinces (Tscherning and Chapman, 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tscherning and Chapman, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many studies have ignored brine because some legal frameworks treat it as a mineral rather than water, and industry actors often externalize brine as separate from surrounding wetlands and aquifers.
“many studies have ignored brine because some legal frameworks treat it as a mineral rather than water, and industry actors often externalize brine as separate from surrounding wetlands and aquifers”
From Lithium and water: Hydrosocial impacts across the life cycle of energy storage (2024) · cites this paper as Flores Fernandez & Alba, 2023
The Case studies and methods section says that treating brine extraction separately from freshwater extraction has kept mineralized groundwater and its interactions with other aquifers out of the Chilean water authority’s studies, models, and water balances. The Conclusion says mining-company studies conceptualize brine and freshwater as separate and use that distinction to argue that brine extraction does not affect wetlands. This supports the claim’s underlying point, but not the broader assertion that many studies have ignored brine altogether. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe 1981 Water Code does not explicitly cover mineralized groundwater-brines as water; therefore, brine is characterized as a mineral in Chile.
“The 1981 Water Code does not explicitly cover mineralized groundwater-brines as water (Ministerio de Justicia Chile 1981; Tala 1994; Flores Fernández and Alba 2023); therefore, brine is characterized as a mineral in Chile (Ministerio de Mineria 1983; Flores Fernández and Alba 2023).”
From S-LCA of lithium mining in Chile and its potential impacts on water and the local community (2025) · cites this paper as Flores Fernández and Alba 2023
The legal definition of brine affects distributional, procedural, and recognitional justice.
“The authors concluded that the legal definition of brine affects distributional (e.g., associated with extraction rights), procedural (e.g., the rights that indigenous communities have in decision-making processes regarding brine), and recognitional (e.g., giving legitimate standing to political, social, and cultural positions) justice (Flores Fernández and Alba 2023).”
From S-LCA of lithium mining in Chile and its potential impacts on water and the local community (2025) · cites this paper as Flores Fernández and Alba 2023
Laws governing lithium extraction in Chile have interpreted brine as a mineral resource, and salt flats are regulated mainly as mines, even though they may also be understood as wetlands.
“laws governing lithium extraction in Chile have interpreted brine as a mineral resource, and salt flats are regulated mainly as mines, even though they may also be understood as wetlands”
From Lithium and water: Hydrosocial impacts across the life cycle of energy storage (2024) · cites this paper as Flores Fernandez & Alba, 2023
To Indigenous Atacameño or Lickanantay people, there is only one water (puri in Kunza) that is alive and includes both brine and surrounding lagoons.
“To Indigenous Atacameño or Lickanantay people, there is only one water ( puri in Kunza) that is alive and includes both brine and surrounding lagoons”
From Lithium and water: Hydrosocial impacts across the life cycle of energy storage (2024) · cites this paper as Flores Fernandez & Alba, 2023
Cites
The hydrosocial cycle: Defining and mobilizing a relational-dialectical approach to water
Linton, J., & Budds, J. (2013) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.10.008 · Cited by 1,139 · see citing works
Hydrosocial territories: a political ecology perspective
Boelens, R., Hoogesteger, J., Swyngedouw, E., Vos, J., & Wester, P. (2016) · Water International · doi:10.1080/02508060.2016.1134898 · Cited by 810 · see citing works
Flexer, V., Baspineiro, C. F., & Galli, C. I. (2018) · Science of the Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.223 · Cited by 768 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The amounts of brines required to produce one ton of lithium vary from one salt flat to another (and even within them) depending on the concentration of lithium minerals dissolved and the efficiency of the process used (Flexer et al., 2018).”
BackgroundLaw, Property, and the Geography of Violence: The Frontier, the Survey, and the Grid
BLOMLEY, N. K. (2003) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1111/1467-8306.93109 · Cited by 767 · see citing works
Sovacool, B. K. (2021) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.101916 · Cited by 614 · see citing works
Law, space, and the geographies of power
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-5296 · Cited by 498 · see citing works
Cultural politics and the hydrosocial cycle: water, power and identity in the Andean highlands
Boelens, R. (2014) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.02.008 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Zwarteveen, M., & Boelens, R. (2014) · Water International · doi:10.1080/02508060.2014.891168 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Contested H2O: science, policy and politics in water resources management in Chile
Budds, J. (2009) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.12.008 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Jerez, B., Garcés, I., & Torres, R. (2021) · Political Geography · doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102382 · Cited by 337 · cited 10× · see citing works
“, 2021), political ecology (Jerez et al., 2021) and hydrogeology and geochemistry (Marazuela et al.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGreen Sacrifice Zones, or Why a Green New Deal Cannot Ignore the Cost Shifts of Just Transitions
Zografos, C., & Robbins, P. (2020) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2020.10.012 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Multiple ontologies of water: Politics, conflict and implications for governance
Yates, J. S., Harris, L. M., & Wilson, N. J. (2017) · Environment and Planning D Society and Space · doi:10.1177/0263775817700395 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Lithium and development imaginaries in Chile, Argentina and Bolivia
Barandiarán, J. (2019) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.09.019 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
The Spatial, the Legal and the Pragmatics of World-Making
Delaney, D. (2010) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203849101 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Interdependencies of lithium mining and communities sustainability in Salar de Atacama, Chile
Liu, W., & Agusdinata, D. B. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120838 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Greening extractivism: Environmental discourses and resource governance in the 'Lithium Triangle'
Voskoboynik, D. M., & Andreucci, D. (2022) · Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space · doi:10.1177/25148486211006345 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Delaney, D. (2014) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132514527035 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Hommes, L., Boelens, R., & Maat, H. (2016) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.02.015 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Liu, W., Agusdinata, D. B., & Myint, S. W. (2019) · International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2019.04.016 · Cited by 162 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The shortcomings of the current way of understanding the functioning andwater balances of the salt flats and ecosystems and the impact of lithium mining have been criticized and demonstrated (SMA, 2016; First Environmental Court, 2019; Liu et al., 2019; DGA, 2021a; Gutiérrez et al., 2022).”
BackgroundThe Politics of Disciplining Water Rights
Boelens, R. (2009) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01516.x · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Diversity of <i>Bacteroidetes</i> in high‐altitude saline evaporitic basins in northern Chile
Dorador, C., Meneses, D., Urtuvia, V., Demergasso, C., Vila, I., Witzel, K., & Imhoff, J. F. (2009) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences · doi:10.1029/2008jg000837 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Harvesting Lithium: water, brine and the industrial dynamics of production in the Salar de Atacama
Bustos-Gallardo, B., Bridge, G., & Prieto, M. (2021) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.01.001 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Babidge, S. (2016) · The Australian Journal of Anthropology · doi:10.1111/taja.12139 · Cited by 120 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…economic benefits from mining companies, but on the other hand, have to live in a profoundly changed environment and face increasingly uncertain water and climate conditions (Babidge, 2013, 2016, 2019; Gundermann and Göbel, 2018; Babidge et al., 2019; Liu and Agusdinata, 2020; Lorca et al., 2022).”
BackgroundBudds, J., Linton, J., & McDonnell, R. A. (2014) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.08.003 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Lithium brine production, reserves, resources and exploration in Chile: An updated review
Cabello, J. (2021) · Ore Geology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2020.103883 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Hydrodynamics of salt flat basins: The Salar de Atacama example
Marazuela, M. A., Vázquez-Suñé, E., Ayora, C., García-Gil, A., & Palma, T. (2019) · Science of the Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.190 · Cited by 96 · cited 2× · see citing works
“, 2021) and hydrogeology and geochemistry (Marazuela et al., 2019; Munk et al., 2021).”
BackgroundClimate Change and Lithium Mining Influence Flamingo Abundance in the Lithium Triangle
Gutiérrez, J. S., Moore, J. N., Donnelly, J. P., Dorador, C., Navedo, J. G., & Senner, N. R. (2022) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2021.2388 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Boelens, R., Perreault, T., & Vos, J. M. C. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316831847 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Formal Law and Local Water Control in the Andean Region: A Fiercely Contested Field
de Vos, H., Boelens, R., & Bustamante, R. (2006) · International Journal of Water Resources Development · doi:10.1080/07900620500405049 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Gajardo, G., & Redón, S. (2019) · Conservation Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/csp2.94 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Claiming Space, Claiming Water: Contested Legal Geographies of Water in South Texas
Jepson, W. E. (2012) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1080/00045608.2011.641897 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Whose Scarcity? The Hydrosocial Cycle and the Changing Waterscape of La Ligua River Basin, Chile
(2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315573953-13 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Swyngedouw, E. A., & Boelens, R. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316831847.008 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Babidge, S. (2013) · The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology · doi:10.1111/jlca.12020 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Babidge, S. (2019) · Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute · doi:10.1111/1467-9655.12965 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Forget, M., & Bos, V. (2022) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102477 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Oro blanco: assembling extractivism in the lithium triangle
Soto-Hernández, D., & Newell, P. J. (2022) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2022.2080061 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Securing the market: water security and the internal contradictions of Chile's Water Code
Budds, J. (2020) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.09.027 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Mining indigenous territories: Consensus, tensions and ambivalences in the Salar de Atacama
Lorca, M., Olivera Andrade, M., Escosteguy, M., Köppel, J., Scoville-Simonds, M., & Hufty, M. (2022) · The Extractive Industries and Society · doi:10.1016/j.exis.2022.101047 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Kalazich, F., Yager, K., Prieto, M., & Babidge, S. (2019) · Journal of Political Ecology · doi:10.2458/v26i1.23169 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
An Inside Sun: Lickanantay Volcanology in the Salar de Atacama
Ramos Chocobar, S., & Tironi, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Earth Science · doi:10.3389/feart.2022.909967 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Prieto, M. (2016) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.10.004 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Indigenous Peoples and Water Governance in Canada
Bakker, K., Simms, R., Joe, N., & Harris, L. M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316831847.013 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Hydrogeologic and Geochemical Distinctions in Freshwater‐Brine Systems of an Andean Salar
Munk, L. A., Boutt, D. F., Moran, B. J., McKnight, S. V., & Jenckes, J. (2021) · Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems · doi:10.1029/2020gc009345 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Thiel, V., Tank, M., Neulinger, S. C., Gehrmann, L., Dorador, C., & Imhoff, J. F. (2010) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00966.x · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Bringing water markets down to Chile’s Atacama Desert
Prieto, M. (2015) · Water International · doi:10.1080/02508060.2015.1107400 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
(2014) · Stanford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780804791878 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
COMUNIDADES INDÍGENAS, EMPRESAS DEL LITIO Y SUS RELACIONES EN EL SALAR DE ATACAMA
Gundermann, H., & Göbel, B. (2018) · Chungará (Arica) · doi:10.4067/s0717-73562018005001602 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
The Legal Geographies of Water Claims: Seawater Desalination in Mining Regions in Chile
Campero, C., & Harris, L. M. (2019) · Water · doi:10.3390/w11050886 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Desalination and the disarticulation of water resources: Stabilising the neoliberal model in Chile
Fragkou, M. C., & Budds, J. (2019) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.1111/tran.12351 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
WATER MINING AND EXTRACTIVISM OF THE SALAR DE ATACAMA, CHILE
GARCÉS, I., & ALVAREZ, G. (2020) · WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.2495/eid200181 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
“Water rights, mining and indigenous groups in Chile's Atacama,”
(2010) · Out of the Mainstream · doi:10.4324/9781849774796-18 · Cited by 37 · cited 5× · see citing works
“…regime enshrined in the Water Code, making visible processes of dispossession and water appropriation in favor of productive activities (mainly agriculture and mining) in indigenous and nonindigenous territories (Budds, 2008, 2009, 2010; Prieto, 2015, 2016, 2022; Romero-Toledo and Jenkins, 2022).”
BackgroundInfluentialEjeian, M., Grant, A., Shon, H. K., & Razmjou, A. (2021) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2021.115169 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
The (not-so-free) Chilean water model. The case of the Antofagasta Region, Atacama Desert, Chile
Prieto, M., Seguel, M. C., Fragkou, M. C., & Fuster, R. (2022) · The Extractive Industries and Society · doi:10.1016/j.exis.2022.101081 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Disputed water: Competing knowledge and power asymmetries in the Yali Alto basin, Chile
Usón, T. J., Henríquez, C., & Dame, J. (2017) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.07.029 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Dorador, C., Fink, P., Hengst, M., Icaza, G., Villalobos, A. S., Vejar, D., Meneses, D., Zadjelovic, V., Burmann, L., Moelzner, J., et al. (2018) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1007/s10482-018-1091-z · Cited by 36 · see citing works
The public trust doctrine and critical legal geographies of water in California
Cantor, A. (2016) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.01.007 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Reframing water: Contesting H 2 O within the European Union
Zurita, M. D. L. M., Thomsen, D. C., Smith, T. F., Lyth, A., Preston, B. L., & Baum, S. (2015) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.07.022 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Prieto, M. (2021) · Annals of the American Association of Geographers · doi:10.1080/24694452.2021.1937036 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Romero-Toledo, H. (2019) · Colombia Internacional · doi:10.7440/colombiaint98.2019.01 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Insights into the microbiology of the chaotropic brines of Salar de Atacama, Chile
Cubillos, C. F., Paredes, A., Yáñez, C., Palma, J., Severino, E., Vejar, D., Grágeda, M., & Dorador, C. (2019) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.01611 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Legal geographies and political ecologies of water allocation in Maui, Hawai‘i
Cantor, A., Kay, K., & Knudson, C. (2020) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.014 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Water legislation in the context of lithium mining in Argentina
Steinmetz, R. L. L., & Fong, S. B. (2019) · Resources Policy · doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101510 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Knowledge Production, Mobilization and Standardization in Chile’s HidroAysén Case
Broitman, C., & Kreimer, P. R. (2017) · Minerva · doi:10.1007/s11024-017-9335-z · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Waters in the Plural: Approaches and opportunities for more grounded research and management
Linton, J. (2022) · Géocarrefour · doi:10.4000/geocarrefour.19295 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Tscherning, R., & Chapman, B. (2020) · Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law · doi:10.1080/02646811.2020.1841399 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Parsing the Politics of Singular and Multiple Waters
Vogt, L., & Walsh, C. (2021) · Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) · doi:10.5167/uzh-214229 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Ocupación humana del paisaje desértico de Atacama, Región de Antofagasta
Castro, V., Aldunate, C., & Varela, V. (2004) · ARQ (Santiago) · doi:10.4067/s0717-69962004005700004 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Toledo, H., & Jenkins, K. (2022) · Current directions in water scarcity research · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-824538-5.00010-8 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Cambios y Mejoras de la Operación Minera en el Salar de Atacama
Ambiental, P. (2005) · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Aguas Equívocas en el Sur de Chile
Bonelli, C. (2017) · UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Aylwin, 2013, Los Pueblos Ind
- 2017, Proyecto “Conservación de Rutas de Trashumancia y Sitios de Significación Cultural Ind
- 2018, Modificación y Texto Refundido de Contrato de Proyecto y de Contrato de Arrendamiento de Pertenencias Mineras OMA, con SQM Salar S.A., SQM S.A. y SQM Potasio S.A.
- 2021, Modelo Integrado de Gestión Hídrica de la Cuenca del Salar de Atacama, Octubre
- 2018, Recurso de Protección Contra Suscripción de Contratos Que Modifican y Fijan Texto Refundido y Actualizado de Contratos Entre CORFO y SQM
- Ferry, 2008, “Timely assets,”, Timely Assets: The Politics of Resources and their Temporalities, 3
- Flores Fernández, 2021, “Desposeer para descarbonizar? El avance de la minería de Litio en el Salar de Maricunga, la última frontera del extractivismo verde,”, Salares Andinos. Ecología de Saberes por la Protección de Nuestro Salares y Humedales, 215
- Gelles, 2010, “Cultural identity and indigenous water rights in the Andean Highland,”, Out of the Mainstream: Water, Rights, Politics and Identity, 119
- Guerra, 2017, Los Tribunales Ambientales en la implementación de los derechos indígenas durante la evaluación ambiental de proyectos de inversión en Chile, Revista Justicia Ambiental, 9, 19
- Linton, 2010, What is Water?, The History of a Modern Abstraction
- Llagostera, 2004, The ancient inhabitants of the Salar de Atacama, Atacameña Prehistory
- Meehan, 2023, Water: A Critical Introduction
- Resolución Exenta N
- Informe Final Análisis Normativo y Comparado Para la Dictación de un Reglamento de Salmueras
- 2021, Salares Andinos. Ecolog
- Sandón, 2019, Recurso de Protección contra SEA de la Región de Antofagasta.
- 2017, Cuarta Actualización del Modelo Hidrogeológico del Salar de Atacama. Proyecto Cambios y Mejoras de la Operación minera en el Salar de Atacama
- Informe de la Sexta Actualización del Modelo Hidrogeológico
- Tala, 1994, El estatuto de las aguas mineralizadas. Derecho de Minería o Derecho de Aguas?, Gaceta Jurídica, 164, 41
- Yáñez, 2011, Las aguas Ind
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The off-sites of lithium production in the Atacama Desert
Weinberg, M. (2023) · The Extractive Industries and Society · doi:10.1016/j.exis.2023.101309 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Lithium and water: Hydrosocial impacts across the life cycle of energy storage
Blair, J. J. A., Vineyard, N., Mulvaney, D., Cantor, A., Sharbat, A., Berry, K., Bartholomew, E., & Ornelas, A. F. (2024) · WIREs Water · doi:10.1002/wat2.1748 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
S-LCA of lithium mining in Chile and its potential impacts on water and the local community
Roche, L., Link, A., Marinova, S., Coroama, V., & Finkbeiner, M. (2025) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-024-02378-8 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“…(e.g., associated with extraction rights), procedural (e.g., the rights that indigenous communities have in decision-making processes regarding brine), and recognitional (e.g., giving legitimate standing to political, social, and cultural positions) justice (Flores Fernández and Alba 2023).”
InfluentialRecent Advances and Future Prospects of Lithium Recovery from Low-Grade Lithium Resources: A Review
Gu, J., Liang, B., Luo, X., Zhang, X., Yuan, W., Xiao, B., & Tang, X. (2024) · Inorganics · doi:10.3390/inorganics13010004 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Hydrosocial Territories Research: An Overview
Alba, R., Betancur‐Alarcón, L., Pereira, M., Villa, Ú. J., & Ortiz-Guerrero, C. E. (2025) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water · doi:10.1002/wat2.70023 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationCarrasco, S., Aracena, J. H., & Cariaga, V. (2023) · The Extractive Industries and Society · doi:10.1016/j.exis.2023.101310 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Cousins, J. J., Cantor, A., & Turley, B. (2024) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water · doi:10.1002/wat2.1751 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Blair, J. J. A., Gutierrez, G., & Balcázar, M. R. (2023) · Human Organization · doi:10.17730/1938-3525-82.3.288 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Britton, A., Olmedo, L., Torres, C., & Blair, J. J. A. (2024) · The Extractive Industries and Society · doi:10.1016/j.exis.2024.101567 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Insights from Antipodean legal geography: Building an environmental legal geography scholarship
Gillespie, J., Robinson, D., & O’Donnell, T. (2024) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/03091325241229810 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Beyond extractivist logic? Contested dynamics of lithium frontier expansion in Chile
Fernández, C. F. (2025) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2025.104029 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Emerging Currents in the Political Ecology of Water
Feldblum, S. B. (2025) · Geography Compass · doi:10.1111/gec3.70031 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Lithium Mining in the Salar de Atacama—Accounting Practices for Water Footprinting
Link, A., Marinova, S., Roche, L., Coroamă, V., Hinkers, L., Borchardt, D., & Finkbeiner, M. (2025) · Water · doi:10.3390/w17111670 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Beyond a Decade of Water Justice: Review, Directions, and Pathways to Achieve “Water for All”
Fanaian, S., Manero, A., Nguyen, N. M., & Grafton, R. Q. (2025) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water · doi:10.1002/wat2.70043 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Gyaase, F., Duartey, K. O., Darko, C. K., Quainoo, A. K., & Nnabuife, S. G. (2026) · Chemical Engineering Journal Green and Sustainable · doi:10.1016/j.cejgas.2026.100061 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Pereira, I. O., Herrera‐León, S., Campos‐Medina, F., & Córdova, C. R. (2026) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-026-01835-7 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Hernández-Rojas, M., Estévez, R. A., Romero, C., Pérez, S., & Labra, F. A. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17188139 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Toro, N., Salazar, I., Salinas‐Rodríguez, E., Saldana, M., Sepúlveda, R., Hernández, P., Madrid, F. M. G., & Castillo, J. (2026) · Minerals Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2026.110821 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Lithium extraction worldwide: A bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review
Teatino, M. A. C., Araujo, J. J. M., Alva-Quezada, G. M., Saona-Polo, F. G., Mamani-Quispe, J. N., Castillo-Chung, A. R., & Arango-Retamozo, S. M. (2026) · Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy · doi:10.1177/25726641261420635 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Agusdinata, D. B., Eakin, H. C., Liu, W., & Aravena, H. I. R. (2026) · Applied Geography · doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2026.104023 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Lithium Extraction Worldwide: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Literature ReviewPreprint
Teatino, M. A. C., Araujo, J. J. M., Alva-Quezada, G. M., & Saona-Polo, F. G. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5119207
Arbeláez-Trujillo, A. M., Parra, C. C., & Aguilar-Soto, M. (2026) · Political Geography · doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2026.103544
Lithium rush: The hidden costs of “green”electric vehicle production
Gentes, I., Policzer, P., & Rowlands, J. (2026) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2026.104708
Ramírez-Olivares, E., Cortes-Álvarez, A., & Robles, J. A. (2026) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su18136860
Arhin, P., & Arhin, G. E. (2026) · Earth System Governance · doi:10.1016/j.esg.2026.100359
Hydrogen Geographies in Latin America: Uneven Development in the Energy Transition
Yang, X., & García-Godos, J. (2026) · Geography Compass · doi:10.1111/gec3.70098
Realizing the human right to water means moving from remedy to prevention
Müller, M. F., Adams, E. A., Faure, J., & Desierto, D. A. (2026) · Nature Water · doi:10.1038/s44221-026-00740-8
Toro, N., Madrid, F. M. G., Salazar, I., Leiva, W. H., Sepúlveda, R., Guzmán, A., MEZA, E., & Castillo, J. (2026) · Minerals · doi:10.3390/min16111118
- Authors
- Flores Fernández, C., & Alba, R.
- Affiliations
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
- ORCID
- Alba, Rossella
- Venue
- Frontiers in Water
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2023-05-09
- Volume
- 5
- ISSN
- 2624-9375 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4382311556
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 27.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Water (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Water Governance and Infrastructure
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Mining and Resource Management
- Social Sciences › Law › Environmental law and policy
- Keywords
- lithium mining, brine, mineralized groundwater, critical legal geography, environmental impact assessment, socio-ecological impacts, lithium demand, electric mobility, Indigenous perspectives, water governance, Chile
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review