The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using Latina/o Critical Race Theory (LatCrit) and Racist Nativism to Explore Intersectionality in the Educational Experiences of Undocumented Chicana College Students
Abstract
A Latina/o Critical Race Theory (LatCrit) analysis has allowed researchers to develop the conceptual framework of racist nativism, a lens that highlights the intersection of racism and nativism. Racist nativism is a conceptual frame that helps researchers to understand how the historical racialization of Immigrants of Color has shaped the contemporary experiences of Latina/o undocumented immigrants. While many definitions of race exist, most scholars agree that race is a socially constructed category. Racist nativism has targeted various groups of immigrants throughout US history. White ethnic immigrants in the late nineteenth century were racialized as foreign because they did not fit into the current perceptions of whiteness. Testimonio is a research strategy that was initially utilized in Latin American literature as a method to document the experiences of oppressed people during times of war. A critical race grounded theory approach is developed from traditional grounded theory in qualitative research, which allows themes to emerge from data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.
Wagner, H. R., Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2575405 · Cited by 46,361
Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques.
Ellis, C., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074814 · Cited by 29,249
(2006) · Cited by 18,730
(1996) · Cited by 11,584
Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth
Yosso *, T. J. (2005) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/1361332052000341006 · Cited by 8,663
Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research
Billson, J. M. (1989) · Human Biology · Cited by 8,560
(1994) · Cited by 6,200
Critical race theory: an introduction
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-2938 · Cited by 6,038
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-3121 · Cited by 2,721
(2000) · The Journal of Negro Education · Cited by 2,472
Cited by
Un/Doing Intersectionality through Higher Education Research
Harris, J. C., & Patton, L. D. (2019) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.2018.1536936 · Cited by 308
Behind School Doors: The Impact of Hostile Racial Climates on Urban Teachers of Color
Kohli, R. (2018) · Urban Education · doi:10.1177/0042085916636653 · Cited by 257
Capper, C. A. (2015) · Educational Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0013161x15607616 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Huber, L. P.
- Venue
- Foundations of Critical Race Theory in Education
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2022-11-28
- Pages
- 215-230
- OpenAlex
- W101730090
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 164.70
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using Latina/o Critical Race Theory (LatCrit) and Racist Nativism to Explore Intersectionality in the Educational Experiences of Undocumented Chicana College Students. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/b23210-23
- The paper
- Huber, L. P. (2022). Using Latina/o Critical Race Theory (LatCrit) and Racist Nativism to Explore Intersectionality in the Educational Experiences of Undocumented Chicana College Students. Foundations of Critical Race Theory in Education. https://doi.org/10.4324/b23210-23
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
