The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Trust: Forms, Foundations, Functions, Failures and Figures
Abstract
Trust deals with a range of questions such as: what are the roles of trust? What can we trust in? Can trust serve as an instrument for the governance of relations? Is trust a substitute, a precondition or an outcome of contracts? The author then goes on to analyse what trust is based on, what its limits are, how it grows and how it can also break down. The role of intermediaries is also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Measuring trust inside organisations
Dietz, G., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2006) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/00483480610682299 · Cited by 596
Blockchains and the economic institutions of capitalism
DAVIDSON, S., DE FILIPPI, P., & POTTS, J. (2018) · Journal of Institutional Economics · doi:10.1017/s1744137417000200 · Cited by 582
Vlaar, P. W. L., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2007) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601106294215 · Cited by 277
Basit, A. A. (2017) · The Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00223980.2017.1372350 · Cited by 100
Trusting Trust in the Context of Higher Education: The Potential Limits of the Trust Concept
Kovač, V. B., & Kristiansen, A. (2010) · Power and Education · doi:10.2304/power.2010.2.3.276 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Nooteboom, B.
- Venue
- Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks
- Publisher
- Edward Elgar Publishing
- Published
- 2002-05-28
- OpenAlex
- W4249144416
- Cited by
- 496
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.25
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trust: Forms, Foundations, Functions, Failures and Figures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4337/9781781950883
- The paper
- Nooteboom, B. (2002). Trust: Forms, Foundations, Functions, Failures and Figures. Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781950883
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
