Cited by 723Digital Economy and Work TransformationEmployment, Labor, and Gender StudiesLegal and Labor Studies

Workers without employers: shadow corporations and the rise of the gig economy

Friedman, Gerald·2014·Review of Keynesian Economics

Abstract

A growing number of American workers are no longer employed in ‘jobs’ with a long-term connection with a company but are hired for ‘gigs’ under ‘flexible’ arrangements as ‘independent contractors’ or ‘consultants,’ working only to complete a particular task or for defined time and with no more connection with their employer than there might be between a consumer and a particular brand of soap or potato chips. While the rise of this ‘gig’ economy is praised by some as a response to the wishes of a more entrepreneurial generation, it is more likely that it is driven by the concerns of businesses to lower wages and benefit costs during business down-turns while also reducing their vulnerability to unfair dismissal lawsuits. The rise of gig labor calls for new initiatives in social policy because it shifts more of the burden of economic risk onto workers even while removing gig workers from many of the employment-bound New-Deal-era social insurance programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4337/roke.2014.02.03

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Value capture from connectivity by platforms relies upon harnessing the affordances and fragilities of immaterial labour.

    “Similarly, we recognise that value capture from connectivity by platforms relies upon harnessing the affordances and fragilities of immaterial labour (Friedman, 2014; Hill, 2015; Leyshon et al., 2016).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Friedman, G.
Corresponding author
Friedman, Gerald
Venue
Review of Keynesian Economics
Published
2014-04
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
171-188
ISSN
  • 2049-5323 (ISSN-L)
  • 2049-5331
OpenAlex
W2058590479
Cited by
723
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 101 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2
FWCI
36.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Review of Keynesian Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
Keywords
gig economy, independent contractors, flexible work arrangements, employment relationship, labor market segmentation, economic risk, social insurance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review