Cited by 725Sharing Economy and PlatformsDigital Platforms and EconomicsDigital Economy and Work Transformation

The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda

Sutherland, Will, Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein·2018·International Journal of Information Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.07.004

Cites

158 of 158 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sutherland, W., & Jarrahi, M. H.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Sutherland, Will
Venue
International Journal of Information Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
43
Pages
328-341
ISSN
0268-4012 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2891235235
Cited by
725
References
158
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 90 · 2024: 112 · 2023: 111 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 113 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 4
FWCI
101.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Information Management (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Keywords
sharing economy, digital platforms, platform mediation, platform affordances, peer-to-peer sharing, technology affordances, research agenda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review