The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Acoustic Correlates of the Spanish Tap-Trill Contrast: Heritage and L2 Spanish Speakers
Abstract
The present study investigates the acoustic correlates of the Spanish tap-trill phonological contrast (/ɾ/-/r/) in the production of 40 Spanish heritage speakers and 20 L2 Spanish learners in Northern California. The acoustic analyses examined the number of occlusions and overall duration in the production of phonemic trills, while the phonetic variants of the phonemic tap were based on the degree of apical constriction: true tap, approximant tap, and perceptual tap. The results from a reading-aloud task indicate that most speakers produced non-canonical phonemic trills with one or zero occlusions and maintain the Spanish tap-trill phonological contrast largely by means of segmental duration, and that this is especially true for L2 learners and English-dominant heritage speakers. In contrast, Spanish-dominant heritage speakers produced the majority of their trills with two or three brief occlusions between the tongue apex and the alveolar ridge. These data confirm that heritage speakers are a heterogeneous group and that variance in their rhotic production is a result of language dominance: English-dominant heritage speakers and L2 learners are most likely to exhibit a modified system to maintain the rhotic phonological contrast in comparison to Spanish-dominant heritage speakers. The findings of this study add to our understanding of the sources of variation in heritage and L2 pronunciation by investigating a largely understudied bilingual population that has traditionally been ignored in bilingual phonetic research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Previous studies have shown the effectiveness of the Bilingual Language Profile questionnaire in capturing variation in language dominance, such as how Spanish dominant bilinguals produced more Spanish tap-trill features like those found in most monolingual Spanish speakers (Amengual 2016).”
From What Heritage Bilinguals Tell Us about the Language of Emotion (2022) · cites this paper as Amengual 2016
Citations
Cites
The Sounds of the World's Languages
Nathan, G. S., Ladefoged, P., & Maddieson, I. (1998) · Language · doi:10.2307/417875 · Cited by 1,724
Heritage Languages: In the ‘Wild’ and in the Classroom
Polinsky, M., & Kagan, O. (2007) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1749-818x.2007.00022.x · Cited by 868
Lipski, J. M. (1994) · Cited by 763
Nonnative and second-language speech perception : commonalities and complementarities
Best, C. T., Tyler, M. D., Bohn, O., & Munro, M. J. (2007) · Cited by 581
Overhearing a Language During Childhood
Au, T. K.-F., Knightly, L. M., Jun, S.-A., & Oh, J. S. (2002) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00444 · Cited by 423
Incomplete Acquisition American Russian
Polinsky, M. (2006) · Cited by 417
Rothman, J. (2007) · International Journal of Bilingualism · doi:10.1177/13670069070110040201 · Cited by 360
(2016) · ¿Por qué? · doi:10.5040/9781474227957.0019 · Cited by 311
Assessing bilingual dominance.
FLEGE, J. E., MACKAY, I. R. A., & PISKE, T. (2002) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716402004046 · Cited by 304
Is the heritage language like a second language?
Montrul, S. A. (2012) · EUROSLA Yearbook · doi:10.1075/eurosla.12.03mon · Cited by 266
Cited by
What Heritage Bilinguals Tell Us about the Language of Emotion
Vargas Fuentes, N. A., Kroll, J. F., & Torres, J. (2022) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages7020144 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Amengual, M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Cruz
- Venue
- Heritage Language Journal
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2016-08-31
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 88-112
- ISSN
- 1550-7076
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 47
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Acoustic Correlates of the Spanish Tap-Trill Contrast: Heritage and L2 Spanish Speakers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.46538/hlj.13.2.2
- The paper
- Amengual, M. (2016). Acoustic Correlates of the Spanish Tap-Trill Contrast: Heritage and L2 Spanish Speakers. Heritage Language Journal. https://doi.org/10.46538/hlj.13.2.2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.