The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Expanding Qualitative Research Interviewing Strategies: Zoom Video Communications
Open accessAbstract
The proliferation of new video conferencing tools offers unique data generation opportunities for qualitative researchers. While in-person interviews were the mainstay of data generation in qualitative studies, video conferencing programs, such as Zoom Video Communications Inc. (Zoom), provide researchers with a cost-effective and convenient alternative to in-person interviews. The uses and advantages of face-to-face interviewing are well documented; however, utilizing video conferencing as a method of data generation has not been well examined. The purpose of this paper is to examine the specific attributes of Zoom that contribute to high quality and in-depth qualitative interviews when in person interviewing is not feasible. While video conferencing was developed to facilitate long-distance or international communication, enhance collaborations and reduce travel costs for business these same features can be extended to qualitative research interviews. Overall, participants reported that Zoom video conferencing was a positive experience. They identified strengths of this approach such as: (1) convenience and ease of use, (2) enhanced personal interface to discuss personal topics (e.g., parenting), (3) accessibility (i.e., phone, tablet, and computer), (4) time-saving with no travel requirements to participate in the research and therefore more time available for their family. Video conferencing software economically supports research aimed at large numbers of participants and diverse and geographically dispersed populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches
Lewis, S. (2015) · Health Promotion Practice · doi:10.1177/1524839915580941 · Cited by 22,105
New Emerging Technologies in Qualitative Research
Redlich-Amirav, D., & Higginbottom, G. (2014) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1212 · Cited by 68
Cited by
Thunberg, S., & Arnell, L. (2022) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2021.1935565 · Cited by 280
Zooming into focus groups: strategies for qualitative research in the era of social distancing
Santhosh, L., Rojas, J. C., & Lyons, P. G. (2021) · ATS Scholar · doi:10.34197/ats-scholar.2020-0127ps · Cited by 91
Scott, S., McGowan, V. J., & Visram, S. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18073837 · Cited by 64
Smiley-McDonald, H. M., Attaway, P. R., Wenger, L. D., Greenwell, K., Lambdin, B. H., & Kral, A. H. (2023) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104100 · Cited by 51
Short video marketing strategy: evidence from successful entrepreneurs on TikTok
Chen, H., Ma, D., & Sharma, B. (2024) · Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1108/jrme-11-2022-0134 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Gray, L., Wong-Wylie, G., Rempel, G., & Cook, K.
- Venue
- The Qualitative Report
- Publisher
- Nova Southeastern University
- Published
- 2020-05-15
- ISSN
- 1052-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 2160-3715
- OpenAlex
- W3024682157
- Cited by
- 625
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 110.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Expanding Qualitative Research Interviewing Strategies: Zoom Video Communications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4212
- The paper
- Gray, L., Wong-Wylie, G., Rempel, G., & Cook, K. (2020). Expanding Qualitative Research Interviewing Strategies: Zoom Video Communications. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4212
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.