Cited by 129Human-Animal Interaction StudiesAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesVeterinary Orthopedics and Neurology

Development and validation of a psychometric tool for assessing impulsivity in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris)

Open access
Wright, Hannah F., Mills, Daniel S., Pollux, Petra M. J.·2011·International Journal of Comparative Psychology

Abstract

Impulsivity is a trait that has received much attention in humans, but in dogs impulsivity is illdefined, and previous studies have tended to focus on aggression, rather than its more pervasive effect on behavior. The objective of this study was to develop a valid psychometric assessment tool of impulsivity in dogs. An owner report questionnaire was constructed using items generated by a survey of experts. Five hundred and seventy one dog owners returned the questionnaire and data were subjected to principal components analysis, revealing a three-factor structure: Factor 1: Behavioral Regulation, Factor 2: Aggression & Response to Novelty, and Factor 3: Responsiveness. The resulting Dog Impulsivity Assessment Scale comprised of 18 items demonstrated evidence of reliability and validity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.46867/ijcp.2011.24.02.03

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Smaller breed dogs tend to show higher impulsivity levels than larger breed dogs.

    “Wright et al. [154] have found that smaller breed dogs tend to show higher impulsivity levels than larger breed dogs, which they explain is due to owner efforts to control dogs of a considerable size to prevent worse problems; in comparison, owners show indulgence towards small dogs’ activities because the consequences or the perceived risk is minor.”

    From Ethical Concerns about Fashionable Dog Breeding (2024) · cites this paper as [154]

    The Discussion reports a significant difference by size and suggests that owners may put more effort into teaching larger dogs self-control. But it presents that explanation as a possibility, not an established cause, and notes that toy-sized dogs were less impulsive than the other size categories. Page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Smaller dog impulsivity is explained by owner efforts to control large dogs and indulgence towards small dogs because consequences or perceived risk are minor.

    “Wright et al. [154] have found that smaller breed dogs tend to show higher impulsivity levels than larger breed dogs, which they explain is due to owner efforts to control dogs of a considerable size to prevent worse problems; in comparison, owners show indulgence towards small dogs’ activities because the consequences or the perceived risk is minor.”

    From Ethical Concerns about Fashionable Dog Breeding (2024) · cites this paper as [154]

    The Discussion reports a size-related difference in impulsivity and proposes that owners may be less inclined to train small dogs’ self-control because the consequences and perceived threat are lower. It presents this owner-training explanation as a possibility, not an established cause; it also notes a breed-composition explanation and an exception for toy dogs. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • During the walk dogs exhibited a temporary reduction in in-kennel behaviors typically reported to be associated with stress, frustration, and in-kennel excessive arousal as they transition to enhanced activity outside of the kennel.

    “These results suggest that during the walk dogs exhibited a temporary reduction in in-kennel behaviors typically reported to be associated with stress, frustration, and in-kennel excessive arousal (11–14) as they transition to enhanced activity outside of the kennel.”

    From Combined enrichment and pharmaceutical intervention reduces excessive arousal in shelter dogs in a randomized controlled trial (2026) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) links repetitive behavior and physical signs to excitement or arousal, and aggression to frustration. It does not establish that these are in-kennel behaviors associated with stress. The temporary reduction during a walk is presented as the citing authors’ own result, not a finding attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Archer, J. (1976). The organization of aggression and fear in vertebrates. In P. P. G. Bateson & P. H. Klopfer (Eds.), Perspectives in ethology (pp. 231-298). New York: Plenum Press.
  2. Capitanio, J. P. (1999). Personality dimensions in adult male rhesus macaques: Prediction of behaviors across time and situation. American Journal of Primatology, 47, 299- 320.
  3. DuPaul, G. J. (1991). Parent and teacher ratings of ADHD symptoms: Psychometric properties in a community-based sample. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 20, 245-253.
  4. Eysenck, S. B., & Eysenck, H. J. (1977). The place of impulsiveness in a dimensional system of personality description. British Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 16, 57-68.
  5. Fatjó, J., Amat, M., & Manteca, X. (2005). Aggression and impulsivity in dogs. The Veterinary Journal, 169, 150.
  6. Gosling, S. D. (2001). From mice to men: What can we learn about personality from animal research? Psychological Bulletin, 127, 45-86.
  7. Gosling, S. D., Kwan, V. S., & John, O. P. (2003). A dog's got personality: A cross-species comparative approach to personality judgments in dogs and humans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1161-1169.
  8. Jones, A. C., & Gosling, S. D. (2005). Temperament and personality in dogs (Canis familiaris): A review and evaluation of past research. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 95, 1-53.
  9. Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. New York: Routledge.
  10. Moeller, F. G., Barratt, E. S., Dougherty, D. M., Schmitz, J. M., & Swann, A. C. (2001). Psychiatric aspects of impulsivity. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 1783- 1793.
  11. Overall, K. L. (2001). Evaluation and management of behavioral conditions. In K. G. Braund (Ed.), Clinical neurology in small animals -localization, diagnosis and treatment. Ithaca, New York: International Veterinary Information Service.
  12. Patton, J. H., Stanford, M. S., & Barratt, E. S. (1995). Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 768-774.
  13. Peremans, K., Audenaert, K., Coopman, F., Blanckaert, P., Jacobs, F., . . . Dierckx, R. (2003). Estimates of regional cerebral blood flow and 5-HT2A receptor density in impulsive, aggressive dogs with 99m Tc-ECD and 123 1-5-1-R91150. European Journal of Nuclear and Molecular Imaging, 30, 1538-1546.
  14. Semple, S. J., Zians, J., Grant, I., & Patterson, T. L. (2005). Impulsivity and methamphetamine use. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 29, 85-93.
  15. Sheppard, G., & Mills, D. S. (2002). The development of a psychometric scale for the evaluation of the emotional predispositions of pet dogs. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 15, 201-222.
  16. Taylor, K. D., & Mills, D. S. (2006). The development and assessment of temperament tests for adult companion dogs. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 1, 94-108.
  17. Tellegen, A. (1982). Multidimensional personality questionnaire manual. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wright, H. F., Mills, D. S., & Pollux, P. M. J.
Affiliations
University of Lincoln (GB)
Corresponding author
Wright, Hannah F.
Venue
International Journal of Comparative Psychology
Published
2011-05-01
Volume
24
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0889-3667 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-3344
OpenAlex
W4312308083
Cited by
129
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Comparative Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • International Journal of Comparative Psychology (cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
Keywords
impulsivity, dogs, psychometric scale development, behavioral regulation, aggression, responsiveness, dog behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review