Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 29Innovations in Medical EducationInterprofessional Education and CollaborationCommunity Health and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 2 are not checked yet.

Third Space, Partnerships, & Clinical Practice: A Literature Review

Open access
Laughlin, Lauren·2021·The Professional Educator
DOI 10.47038/tpe.44.01.05
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Third space theory has been applied with progressive frequency to teacher education, partnerships, and clinical practice. This review of literature addresses how the application of third space theory has manifested in partnerships, clinical practice, and the associated stakeholders. Since moving towards third space is a process, it requires a continual embracing of tensions. It is within these tensions related to the application of the principles of third space theory within partnerships and clinical practice that three themes came to the surface. They include (a) diffusing hierarchy, embracing collaboration; (b) rejecting binaries, embracing democracy; and (c) overcoming borders, spanning boundaries. I address implications for moving forward and furthering third space partnerships and provide recommendations regarding intentionality and future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.47038/tpe.44.01.05

Cites

18 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 43 (1), 51-70. https://www.jstor.org/stable/teaceducquar.43.1.51 Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture . Routledge.

Cited by

See all 29

Related

Metadata

Authors
Laughlin, L.
Corresponding author
Laughlin, Lauren
ORCID
Laughlin, Lauren
Venue
The Professional Educator
Publisher
Truman Pierce Institute
Published
2021-11-15
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
21-33
ISSN
  • 0196-786X (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-6618
DOI
10.47038/tpe.44.01.05
OpenAlex
W3213240313
Cited by
27
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • The Professional Educator (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Community Health and Development
Keywords
third space, partnership, clinical practice, teacher professional development, university-school partnership

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.