PreprintCited by 3

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neuroeconomics of suicide

Takahashi, Taiki·2011·arXiv

Abstract

Suicidal behavior is a leading cause of injury and death worldwide. Suicide has been associated with psychiatric illnesses such as depression and schizophrenia, as well as economic uncertainty, and social/cultural factors. This study proposes a neuroeconomic framework of suicide. Neuroeconomic parameters (e.g., risk-attitude, probability weighting, time discounting in intertemporal choice, and loss aversion) are predicted to be related to suicidal behavior. Neurobiological and neuroendocrinological substrates such as serotonin, dopamine, cortisol (HPA axis), nitric oxide, serum cholesterol, epinephrine, norepinephrine, gonadal hormones (e.g., estradiol and progesterone), dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in brain regions such as the orbitofrontal/dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and limbic regions (e.g., the amygdala) may supposedly be related to the neuroeconomic parameters modulating the risk of suicide. The present framework puts foundations for "molecular neuroeconomics" of decision-making processes underlying suicidal behavior.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1111.6488

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2000) Economics and identity Quarterly Journal of Economics 115, 715-775
  2. Becker G. S. and Murphy K. A. Social Economics: Market Behavior in a Social Environment. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press (February 28, 2003)
  3. Dombrovski AY, Szanto K, Siegle GJ, Wallace ML, Forman SD, Sahakian B, Reynolds CF 3rd, Clark L. (2011) Lethal Forethought: Delayed Reward Discounting Differentiates High-and Low-Lethality Suicide Attempts in Old Age. Biological Psychiatry (in press)
  4. Dudley M, Goldney R, Hadzi-Pavlovic D. (2010) Are adolescents dying by suicide taking SSRI antidepressants? A review of observational studies. Australas Psychiatry. 18, 242-245.
  5. Hamermesh, D.S., and Soss. N.M. (1974) -An Economic Theory of Suicide,‖ Journal of Political Economy, pp. 83-98.
  6. Kerkhof, A.J.F.M. Attempted suicide: patterns and trends. In: K. Hawton and K. van Heeringen, Editors, The International Handbook of Suicide and Attempted Suicide, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester (2000), pp. 49-64.
  7. Kunugi, H. Takei, N. Aoki H. and Nanko S., (1997) Low serum cholesterol in suicide attempters, Biol. Psychiatry 41, pp. 196-200.
  8. Marcotte, DE (2003) The economics of suicide, revisited. Southern Economic Journal, 69, 628-643.
  9. Meana, J.J. Barturen F. and Garcia-Sevilla, J.A. (1992)Alpha 2-adrenoceptors in the brain of suicide victims: increased receptor density associated with major depression, Biol. Psychiatry 31, pp. 471-490.
  10. McGowan, P.O. Sasaki, A. D'Alessio, A.C. Dymov, S. Labonte, B. Szyf, M. Turecki G. and Meaney, M.J. (2009) Epigenetic regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor in human brain associates with childhood abuse, Nat. Neurosci. 12, pp. 342-348.
  11. Takahashi, T (2009) Theoretical frameworks for neuroeconomics of intertemporal choice. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics. 2(2), 75-90.
  12. Takahashi T, Oono H, Inoue T, et al. (2008b) Depressive patients are more impulsive and inconsistent in intertemporal choice behavior for monetary gain and loss than healthy subjects -An analysis based on Tsallis' statistics, NeuroEndocrinology Letters, 29, 351-358
  13. Takahashi T, Shinada M, Inukai K, Tanida S, Takahashi C, Mifune N, Takagishi H, Horita Y, Hashimoto H, Yokota K, Kameda T, Yamagishi T. (2010) Stress hormones predict hyperbolic time-discount rates six months later in adults. NeuroEndocrinology Letters, 31, 616-621.
  14. Tversky, A and Kahneman D (1992). "Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty". Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5: 297-323.
  15. van Heeringen C, Bijttebier S, Godfrin K. (2011) Suicidal brains: a review of functional and structural brain studies in association with suicidal behaviour. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 35, 688-698.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Takahashi, T.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2011
References
4
Type
Preprint

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review