CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 35Statistical Methods and InferenceSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesStochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques

An Equivalence between the Lasso and Support Vector Machines

Open access
Jaggi, Martin·2013·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1303.1152arXiv 1303.1152
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We investigate the relation of two fundamental tools in machine learning and signal processing, that is the support vector machine (SVM) for classification, and the Lasso technique used in regression. We show that the resulting optimization problems are equivalent, in the following sense. Given any instance of an $\ell_2$-loss soft-margin (or hard-margin) SVM, we construct a Lasso instance having the same optimal solutions, and vice versa. As a consequence, many existing optimization algorithms for both SVMs and Lasso can also be applied to the respective other problem instances. Also, the equivalence allows for many known theoretical insights for SVM and Lasso to be translated between the two settings. One such implication gives a simple kernelized version of the Lasso, analogous to the kernels used in the SVM setting. Another consequence is that the sparsity of a Lasso solution is equal to the number of support vectors for the corresponding SVM instance, and that one can use screening rules to prune the set of support vectors. Furthermore, we can relate sublinear time algorithms for the two problems, and give a new such algorithm variant for the Lasso. We also study the regularization paths for both methods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1303.1152

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Support vector machines are equivalent to the lasso.

    “See, for example,Jaggi (2013) andHastie, Tibshirani, and Friedman (2009), who discuss the equivalence of support vector machines with the lasso.”

    From Empirical Asset Pricing via Machine Learning (2020) · cites this paper as Jaggi (2013)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [BvdG11] Peter B¨ uhlmann and Sara van de Geer. Statistics for High-Dimensional Data - Methods, Theory and Applications . Springer Series in Statistics 0172-7397. Springer, 2011.
  2. [Zie95] G¨ unter M Ziegler. Lectures on Polytopes , volume 152 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics . Springer Verlag, 1995.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Jaggi, M.
Affiliations
École Polytechnique (FR)
Corresponding author
Jaggi, Martin
ORCID
Jaggi, Martin
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2013
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1303.1152
arXiv
1303.1152
OpenAlex
W2166168182
Cited by
35
References
45
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
Keywords
LASSO, support vector machine, equivalence of optimization problems, sparsity, support vectors, screening rules, sublinear-time algorithms, regularization path, sparse regression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review