CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 40Advanced Frequency and Time StandardsRelativity and Gravitational TheoryNetwork Time Synchronization Technologies

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Atomic clocks: new prospects in metrology and geodesy

Open access
Delva, Pacôme, Lodewyck, Jérôme·2013·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1308.6766arXiv 1308.6766
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We present the latest developments in the field of atomic clocks and their applications in metrology and fundamental physics. In the light of recent advents in the accuracy of optical clocks, we present an introduction to the relativistic modelization of frequency transfer and a detailed review of chronometric geodesy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1308.6766

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two clocks with an accuracy of 10^-18 in relative frequency shift would detect a 1-cm geoid height variation between them, corresponding to a geopotential variation ΔW of about 0.1 m^2 s^-2.

    “For example, two clocks with an accuracy of 10 -18 in terms of relative frequency shift would detect a 1-cm geoid height variation between them, corresponding to a geopotential variation Δ W”

    From Determination of a high spatial resolution geopotential model using atomic clock comparisons (2017) · cites this paper as Delva and Lodewyck 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. [4][4] R. Bondarescu, M. Bondarescu, G. Het´ enyi, L. Boschi, P. Jetzer, and J. Balakrishna. Geophysical applicability of atomic clocks: direct continental geoid mapping. Geophysical Journal International , 191:78-82, October 2012. -
  2. [6][6] M. Burˇ sa, S. Kenyon, J. Kouba, Z. ˇ S´ ıma, V. Vatrt, V. V´ ıtek, and M. Vojt´ ıˇ skov´ a. The geopotential value W 0 for specifying the relativistic atomic time scale and a global vertical reference system. Journal of Geodesy , 81:103-110, February 2007. -
  3. [7][7] L. Cacciapuoti and C. Salomon. Space clocks and fundamental tests: The ACES experiment. The European Physical 8. Journal -Special Topics , 172:57-68, 2009. 10.1140/epjst/e2009-01041-7. - · DOI
  4. [10][10] P. Delva, A. ˇ Cadeˇ z, U. Kosti´ c, and S. Carloni. A relativistic and autonomous navigation satellite system. In Gravitational Waves and Experimental Gravity , pages 277-280, 2011. Proceedings of the XLVI th RENCONTRES DE MORIOND And GPhyS Colloquium. -
  5. [12][12] J. Gu´ ena, M. Abgrall, D. Rovera, P. Laurent, B. Chupin, M. Lours, G. Santarelli, P. Rosenbusch, M.E. Tobar, Ruoxin Li, K. Gibble, A. Clairon, and S. Bize. Progress in atomic fountains at lnesyrte. Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on , 59(3):391-409, 2012. -
  6. [14][14] A. Hees, S. Bertone, and C. Le PoncinLafitte. Frequency shift up to the 2-PM - approximation. In S. Boissier, P. de Laverny, N. Nardetto, R. Samadi, D. VallsGabaud, and H. Wozniak, editors, SF2A2012: Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the French Society of Astronomy and Astrophysics , pages 145-148, December 2012. -
  7. [15][15] Bernhard Hofmann-Wellenhof and Helmut Moritz. Physical geodesy . Springer, 2006. -
  8. [19][19] S. M. Kopeikin, M. Efroimsky, and G. Kaplan. Relativistic celestial mechanics of the solar system . Wiley-VCH, 2011. -
  9. [22][22] N. Leefer, C. T. M. Weber, A. Cing¨ oz, J. R. Torgerson, and D. Budker. New limits on variation of the fine-structure constant using atomic dysprosium. ArXiv e-prints , April 2013. -
  10. [24][24] Olivier Lopez, Adil Haboucha, Bruno Chanteau, Christian Chardonnet, Anne Amy-Klein, and Giorgio Santarelli. Ultra-stable long distance optical frequency distribution using the internet fiber network. Opt. Express , 20(21):23518-23526, Oct 2012. -
  11. [28][28] J. M¨ uller, M. Soffel, and S. A. Klioner. Geodesy and relativity. Journal of Geodesy , 82:133-145, March 2008. -
  12. [30][30] Thomas E Parker. Long-term comparison of caesium fountain primary frequency standards. Metrologia , 47(1):1, 2010. -
  13. [31][31] G. Petit and G. Panfilo. Comparison of frequency standards used for tai. Instrumentation and Measurement, IEEE Transactions on , 62(6):15501555, 2013. -
  14. [32][32] G. Petit and P. Wolf. Relativistic theory for time comparisons: a review. Metrologia , 42:138, June 2005. -
  15. [33][33] K. Predehl, G. Grosche, S. M. F. Raupach, S. Droste, O. Terra, J. Alnis, Th. Legero, T. W. H¨ ansch, Th. Udem, R. Holzwarth, and H. Schnatz. A 920kilometer optical fiber link for frequency metrology at the 19th decimal place. Science , 336(6080):441-444, 2012. -
  16. [36][36] M. Soffel, S. A. Klioner, G. Petit, P. Wolf, S. M. Kopeikin, P. Bretagnon, V. A. Brumberg, N. Capitaine, T. Damour, T. Fukushima, B. Guinot, T.-Y. Huang, L. Lindegren, C. Ma, K. Nordtvedt, J. C. Ries, P. K. Seidelmann, D. Vokrouhlick´ y, C. M. Will, and C. Xu. The IAU 2000 Resolutions for Astrometry, Celestial Mechanics, and Metrology in the Relativistic Framework: Explanatory Supplement. The Astronomical Journal , 126:26872706, December 2003. -
  17. [39][39] J Terrien. News from the international bureau of weights and measures. Metrologia , 4(1):41, 1968. -
  18. [40][40] M. Vermeer. Chronometric levelling. Reports of the Finnish Geodetic Institute , 83(2):1-7, 1983. -
  19. [41][41] C. M. Will. Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics . Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics, by Clifford M.˜Will, pp.˜396.˜ISBN 0521439736.˜Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, March 1993., 1993. -
  20. [42][42] C. M. Will. The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment. Living Reviews in Relativity , 9(3), 2006. -
  21. [44][44] Jun Ye and Steven T Cundiff. Femtosecond optical frequency comb: Principle, Operation and Applications . Springer, 2004.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Delva, P., & Lodewyck, J.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2013
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1308.6766
arXiv
1308.6766
OpenAlex
W1544793178
Cited by
40
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Time Synchronization Technologies
Keywords
atomic clocks, optical clocks, frequency transfer, time and frequency metrology, fundamental physics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review