CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 722Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstro and Planetary ScienceHistory and Developments in Astronomy

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Understanding the Mass-Radius Relation for Sub-Neptunes: Radius as a Proxy for Composition

Open access
Lopez, Eric D., Fortney, Jonathan J.·2013·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1311.0329arXiv 1311.0329
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Transiting planet surveys like Kepler have provided a wealth of information on the distribution of planetary radii, particularly for the new populations of super-Earth and sub-Neptune sized planets. In order to aid in the physical interpretation of these radii, we compute model radii for low-mass rocky planets with hydrogen-helium envelopes. We provide model radii for planets 1-20 Earth masses, with envelope fractions from 0.01-20%, levels of irradiation 0.1-1000x Earth's, and ages from 100 Myr to 10 Gyr. In addition we provide simple analytic fits that summarize how radius depends on each of these parameters. Most importantly, we show that at fixed composition, radii show little dependence on mass for planets with more than ~1% of their mass in their envelope. Consequently, planetary radius is to first order a proxy for planetary composition for Neptune and sub-Neptune sized planets. We recast the observed mass-radius relationship as a mass-composition relationship and discuss it in light of traditional core accretion theory. We discuss the transition from rocky super-Earths to sub-Neptune planets with large volatile envelopes. We suggest 1.75 Earth radii as a physically motivated dividing line between these two populations of planets. Finally, we discuss these results in light of the observed radius occurrence distribution found by Kepler.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1311.0329

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 65

  1. Anders, E., & Grevesse, N. 1989, GeCoA, 53, 197 · DOI
  2. Baraffe, I., Alibert, Y., Chabrier, G., & Benz, W. 2006, A&A, 450, 1221 · DOI
  3. Batalha, N. M., Borucki, W. J., Bryson, S. T., et al. 2011, ApJ, 729, 27 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Batalha, N. M., Rowe, J. F., & Bryson, S. T. 2013, ApJS, 204, 24 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bodenheimer, P., Hubickyj, O., & Lissauer, J. J. 2000, Icar, 143, 2 · DOI
  6. Bodenheimer, P., & Pollack, J. B. 1986, Icar, 67, 391 · DOI
  7. Borucki, W. J., Koch, D. G., Basri, G., et al. 2011, ApJ, 736, 19 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Carter, J. A., Agol, E., Chaplin, W. J., et al. 2012, Sci, 337, 556 · DOI
  9. Chiang, E., & Laughlin, G. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 3444 · DOI
  10. Cochran, W. D., Fabrycky, D. C., Torres, G., et al. 2011, ApJS, 197, 7 · DOI
  11. Dragomir, D., Matthews, J. M., Eastman, J. D., et al. 2013, ApJL, 772, L2 · DOI
  12. Dumusque, X., Bonomo, A. S., Haywood, R. D., et al. 2014, ApJ, 789, 154 · DOI
  13. Elkins-Tanton, L. T., & Seager, S. 2008, ApJ, 685, 1237 · DOI
  14. Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S., & Barnes, J. W. 2007, ApJ, 659, 1661 · DOI
  15. Fortney, J. J., Mordasini, C., Nettelmann, N., et al. 2013, ApJ, 775, 80 · DOI
  16. Fressin, F., Torres, G., Charbonneau, D., et al. 2013, ApJ, 766, 81 · DOI
  17. Gillon, M., Demory, B.-O., Benneke, B., et al. 2012, A&A, 539, A28 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Guillot, T., Chabrier, G., Gautier, D., & Morel, P. 1995, ApJ, 450, 463 · DOI
  19. Hansen, B. M. S., & Murray, N. 2013, ApJ, 775, 53 · DOI
  20. Hatzes, A. P., Fridlund, M., Nachmani, G., et al. 2011, ApJ, 743, 75 · DOI
  21. Hayashi, C., Nakazawa, K., & Nakagawa, Y. 1985, in Protostars and Planets II, ed. D. C. Black & M. S. Matthews (Tucson, AZ: Univ. Arizona Press), 1100
  22. Henning, W. G., O'Connell, R. J., & Sasselov, D. D. 2009, ApJ, 707, 1000 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Howard, A. W., Marcy, G. W., Bryson, S. T., et al. 2012, ApJS, 201, 15 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Howard, A. W., Sanchis-Ojeda, R., Marcy, G. W., et al. 2013, Natur, 503, 381 · DOI
  25. Hubbard, W. B., Fortney, J. J., Lunine, J. I., et al. 2001, ApJ, 560, 413 · DOI
  26. Hubbard, W. B., Hattori, M. F., Burrows, A., & Hubeny, I. 2007, ApJL, 658, L59 · DOI
  27. Ikoma, M., & Hori, Y. 2012, ApJ, 753, 66 · DOI
  28. Jackson, A. P., Davis, T. A., & Wheatley, P. J. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 2024 · DOI
  29. Jackson, B., Miller, N., Barnes, R., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 910 · DOI
  30. Jontof-Hutter, D., Lissauer, J. J., Rowe, J. F., & Fabrycky, D. C. 2014, ApJ, 785, 15 · DOI
  31. Lecavelier Des Etangs, A. 2007, A&A, 461, 1185 · DOI
  32. Léger, A., Rouan, D., Schneider, J., et al. 2009, A&A, 506, 287 · DOI
  33. Lissauer, J. J., Fabrycky, D. C., Ford, E. B., et al. 2011, Natur, 470, 53 · DOI
  34. Lissauer, J. J., Jontof-Hutter, D., Rowe, J. F., et al. 2013, ApJ, 770, 131 · DOI
  35. Lopez, E. D., & Fortney, J. J. 2013, ApJ, 776, 2 · DOI
  36. Lopez, E. D., Fortney, J. J., & Miller, N. 2012, ApJ, 761, 59 · DOI
  37. Marcus, R. A., Sasselov, D., Hernquist, L., & Stewart, S. T. 2010, ApJL, 712, L73 · DOI
  38. Marcus, R. A., Stewart, S. T., Sasselov, D., & Hernquist, L. 2009, ApJL, 700, L118 · DOI
  39. Marley, M. S., Fortney, J. J., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., & Lissauer, J. J. 2007, ApJ, 655, 541 · DOI
  40. Miller, N., & Fortney, J. J. 2011, ApJL, 736, L29 · DOI
  41. Mordasini, C. 2013, A&A, 558, A113 · DOI
  42. Mordasini, C., Alibert, Y., Georgy, C., et al. 2012, A&A, 547, A112 · DOI
  43. Morley, C. V., Fortney, J. J., Kempton, E. M.-R., et al. 2013, ApJ, 775, 33 · DOI
  44. Morton, T. D., & Swift, J. J. 2013, arXiv:1303.3013 · arXiv
  45. Nettelmann, N., Fortney, J. J., Kramm, U., & Redmer, R. 2011, ApJ, 733, 2 · DOI
  46. Nettelmann, N., Holst, B., Kietzmann, A., et al. 2008, ApJ, 683, 1217 · DOI
  47. Owen, J. E., & Jackson, A. P. 2012, MNRAS, 425, 2931 · DOI
  48. Owen, J. E., & Wu, Y. 2013, ApJ, 775, 105 · DOI
  49. Pepe, F., Cameron, A. C., Latham, D. W., et al. 2013, Natur, 503, 377 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Petigura, E. A., Howard, A. W., & Marcy, G. W. 2013a, PNAS, 110, 19273 · DOI
  51. Petigura, E. A., Marcy, G. W., & Howard, A. W. 2013b, ApJ, 770, 69 · DOI
  52. Queloz, D., Bouchy, F., Moutou, C., et al. 2009, A&A, 506, 303 · DOI
  53. Ribas, I., Guinan, E. F., Güdel, M., & Audard, M. 2005, ApJ, 622, 680 · DOI
  54. Rogers, L. A., Bodenheimer, P., Lissauer, J. J., & Seager, S. 2011, ApJ, 738, 59 · DOI
  55. Rogers, L. A., & Seager, S. 2010a, ApJ, 712, 974 · DOI
  56. Rogers, L. A., & Seager, S. 2010b, ApJ, 716, 1208 · DOI
  57. Saumon, D., Chabrier, G., & van Horn, H. M. 1995, ApJS, 99, 713 · DOI
  58. Valencia, D., Guillot, T., Parmentier, V., & Freedman, R. S. 2013, ApJ, 775, 10 · DOI
  59. Valencia, D., Ikoma, M., Guillot, T., & Nettelmann, N. 2010, A&A, 516, A20 · DOI
  60. Valencia, D., Sasselov, D. D., & O'Connell, R. J. 2007, ApJ, 665, 1413 · DOI
  61. Weiss, L. M., Marcy, G. W., Rowe, J. F., et al. 2013, ApJ, 768, 14 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Wright, J. T., Fakhouri, O., Marcy, G. W., et al. 2011, PASP, 123, 412 · DOI
  63. Xie, J. W., Wu, Y., & Lithwick, Y. 2014, ApJ, 789, 165 · DOI
  64. Zahnle, K. J., & Catling, D. C. 2013, Lunar and Planetary Institute Science Con- ference Abstracts, Vol. 44, Lunar and Planetary Institute Science Conference Abstracts, 2787
  65. Zapolsky, H. S., & Salpeter, E. E. 1969, ApJ, 158, 809 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • The Astrobiology Primer v2.0

    Domagal-Goldman, S. D., Wright, K. E., Domagal-Goldman, S. D., Wright, K. E., Adamala, K., Arina de la Rubia, L., Bond, J., Dartnell, L. R., Goldman, A. D., Lynch, K., et al. (2016) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2015.1460 · Cited by 136

Metadata

Authors
Lopez, E. D., & Fortney, J. J.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2013
Volume
792
Issue
1
Pages
1-1
ISSN
0004-637X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1311.0329
arXiv
1311.0329
OpenAlex
W2952534059
Cited by
722
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 11
FWCI
24.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1010017)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX09AC22G)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › History and Developments in Astronomy
Keywords
mass-radius relation, sub-Neptunes, super-Earths, planetary radius, planetary composition, hydrogen/helium envelope, terrestrial planets, core accretion, irradiation, Kepler

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review