PreprintCited by 5,370Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Visual Attention and Saliency Detection

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps

Open access

Abstract

This paper addresses the visualisation of image classification models, learnt using deep Convolutional Networks (ConvNets). We consider two visualisation techniques, based on computing the gradient of the class score with respect to the input image. The first one generates an image, which maximises the class score [Erhan et al., 2009], thus visualising the notion of the class, captured by a ConvNet. The second technique computes a class saliency map, specific to a given image and class. We show that such maps can be employed for weakly supervised object segmentation using classification ConvNets. Finally, we establish the connection between the gradient-based ConvNet visualisation methods and deconvolutional networks [Zeiler et al., 2013].

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1312.6034

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [1][1] D. Baehrens, T. Schroeter, S. Harmeling, M. Kawanabe, K. Hansen, and K.-R. M¨ uller. How to explain individual classification decisions. JMLR , 11:1803-1831, 2010. -
  2. [4][4] D. C. Ciresan, U. Meier, and J. Schmidhuber. Multi-column deep neural networks for image classification. In Proc. CVPR , pages 3642-3649, 2012. -
  3. [8][8] A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In NIPS , pages 1106-1114, 2012. -
  4. [12][12] K. Simonyan, A. Vedaldi, and A. Zisserman. Deep Fisher networks and class saliency maps for object classification and localisation. In ILSVRC workshop , 2013. URL http://image-net.org/ challenges/LSVRC/2013/slides/ILSVRC\_az.pdf . -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 801–900 of 1,056

Metadata

Authors
Simonyan, K., Vedaldi, A., & Zisserman, A.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2013
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169393322
Cited by
5,370
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 259 · 2024: 513 · 2023: 605 · 2022: 584 · 2021: 1000 · 2020: 776 · 2019: 650 · 2018: 434 · 2017: 250 · 2016: 150 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 19
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
image classification, saliency maps, class activation maps, deconvolutional networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review