Cited by 3,674Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsDigital Image Processing Techniques

Interactive graph cuts for optimal boundary & region segmentation of objects in N-D images

Boykov, Y.Y., Jolly, M.-P.·2002·Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001

Abstract

In this paper we describe a new technique for general purpose interactive segmentation of N-dimensional images. The user marks certain pixels as "object" or "background" to provide hard constraints for segmentation. Additional soft constraints incorporate both boundary and region information. Graph cuts are used to find the globally optimal segmentation of the N-dimensional image. The obtained solution gives the best balance of boundary and region properties among all segmentations satisfying the constraints. The topology of our segmentation is unrestricted and both "object" and "background" segments may consist of several isolated parts. Some experimental results are presented in the context of photo/video editing and medical image segmentation. We also demonstrate an interesting Gestalt example. A fast implementation of our segmentation method is possible via a new max-flow algorithm.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv.2001.937505

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fixing topological artifacts typically requires handcrafted refinement rules or architectures specialized to a particular task.

    “Fixing these artifacts typically requires handcrafted refinement rules or architectures specialized to a particular task.”

    From rNCA: Self-Repairing Segmentation Masks (2025) · cites this paper as [16]

  • Random Walks and Graph Cuts learn from scribbles and allow additional scribbles for refinement, but need a large number of scribbles to get satisfactory segmentation.

    “Random Walks [7] and Graph Cuts [8] learn from scribbles and allow the user to provide additional scribbles for refinement. They use Random Walker and Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) as the underpinning model. However, they need a large number of scribbles to get satisfactory segmentation.”
  • GrabCut works with a user-provided bounding box and requires fewer interactions than Graph Cuts, but its performance is limited by the representativity of the underpinning GMM.

    “GrabCut [9] works with a user-provided bounding box to start the segmentation and requires fewer interactions compared with Graph Cuts [8], but the performance is still limited by the representativity of the underpinning GMM.”
  • Most interactive image segmentation methods rely on low-level features and require a relatively large amount of user interactions to deal with images with low contrast and ambiguous boundaries.

    “However, most of these methods rely on low-level features and require a relatively large amount of user interactions to deal with images with low contrast and ambiguous boundaries.”
  • Graph Cuts can be used to minimize Eq. (6) when the pairwise potential is submodular, such as when the segmentation is binary with the compatibility being the delta function and the pairwise function being positive.

    “Graph Cuts [8], [46] can be used to minimize Eq. (6) when”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boykov, Y. Y., & Jolly, M.-P.
Affiliations
Siemens (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001
Published
2002-11-13
Volume
1
Pages
105-112
OpenAlex
W2169551590
Cited by
3,674
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 126 · 2020: 151 · 2019: 161 · 2018: 177 · 2017: 222 · 2016: 243 · 2015: 264 · 2014: 289 · 2013: 305 · 2012: 275
FWCI
11.46
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Image Processing Techniques
Keywords
interactive segmentation, graph cuts, hard and soft constraints, max-flow algorithm, medical image segmentation, video editing, Gestalt principles, object-background segmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review