PreprintCited by 1,089Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningNeural Networks and ApplicationsAdvanced Neural Network Applications

An Empirical Investigation of Catastrophic Forgetting in Gradient-Based Neural Networks

Open access
Goodfellow, Ian J., Mirza, Mehdi, Xiao, Da, Courville, Aaron, Bengio, Yoshua·2013·arXiv

Abstract

Catastrophic forgetting is a problem faced by many machine learning models and algorithms. When trained on one task, then trained on a second task, many machine learning models "forget" how to perform the first task. This is widely believed to be a serious problem for neural networks. Here, we investigate the extent to which the catastrophic forgetting problem occurs for modern neural networks, comparing both established and recent gradient-based training algorithms and activation functions. We also examine the effect of the relationship between the first task and the second task on catastrophic forgetting. We find that it is always best to train using the dropout algorithm--the dropout algorithm is consistently best at adapting to the new task, remembering the old task, and has the best tradeoff curve between these two extremes. We find that different tasks and relationships between tasks result in very different rankings of activation function performance. This suggests the choice of activation function should always be cross-validated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1312.6211

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • FSL typically doesn't consider base class performance in testing.

    “FSL typically doesn't consider base class performance in testing [53].”

    From Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning for Classification and Object Detection: A Survey (2025) · cites this paper as [53]

    The Experiments section (pp. 3–4) studies catastrophic forgetting across old and new tasks and measures test error on both. Our copy does not discuss few-shot learning (FSL) or whether FSL testing typically excludes base-class performance; searches for FSL, few-shot learning, and base classes found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Bastien, Fr´ ed´ eric, Lamblin, Pascal, Pascanu, Razvan, Bergstra, James, Goodfellow, Ian J., Bergeron, Arnaud, Bouchard, Nicolas, and Bengio, Yoshua. Theano: new features and speed improvements. Deep Learning and Unsupervised Feature Learning NIPS 2012 Workshop, 2012.
  2. Bergstra, James and Bengio, Yoshua. Random search for hyper-parameter optimization. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 13:281-305, February 2012.
  3. Bergstra, James, Breuleux, Olivier, Bastien, Fr´ ed´ eric, Lamblin, Pascal, Pascanu, Razvan, Desjardins, Guillaume, Turian, Joseph, Warde-Farley, David, and Bengio, Yoshua. Theano: a CPU and GPU math expression compiler. In Proceedings of the Python for Scientific Computing Conference (SciPy) , June 2010. Oral Presentation.
  4. Blitzer, John, Dredze, Mark, and Pereira, Fernando. Biographies, bollywood, boom-boxes and blenders: Domain adaptation for sentiment classification. In ACL '07 , pp. 440-447, 2007.
  5. Glorot, Xavier, Bordes, Antoine, and Bengio, Yoshua. Deep sparse rectifier neural networks. In JMLR W&CP: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS 2011) , April 2011a.
  6. Glorot, Xavier, Bordes, Antoine, and Bengio, Yoshua. Domain adaptation for large-scale sentiment classification: A deep learning approach. In Proceedings of theTwenty-eight International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML'11) , volume 27, pp. 97-110, June 2011b.
  7. Goodfellow, Ian J., Warde-Farley, David, Lamblin, Pascal, Dumoulin, Vincent, Mirza, Mehdi, Pascanu, Razvan, Bergstra, James, Bastien, Fr´ ed´ eric, and Bengio, Yoshua. Pylearn2: a machine learning research library. arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.4214 , 2013a. · arXiv
  8. Goodfellow, Ian J., Warde-Farley, David, Mirza, Mehdi, Courville, Aaron, and Bengio, Yoshua. Maxout networks. In Dasgupta, Sanjoy and McAllester, David (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML'13) , pp. 13191327. ACM, 2013b. URL http://icml.cc/ 2013/ .
  9. Hinton, Geoffrey E., Srivastava, Nitish, Krizhevsky, Alex, Sutskever, Ilya, and Salakhutdinov, Ruslan. Improving neural networks by preventing coadaptation of feature detectors. Technical report, arXiv:1207.0580, 2012. · arXiv
  10. Martens, James and Sutskever, Ilya. Learning recurrent neural networks with Hessian-free optimization. In Proc. ICML'2011 . ACM, 2011.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goodfellow, I. J., Mirza, M., Xiao, D., Courville, A., & Bengio, Y.
Affiliations
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2013
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2113839990
Cited by
1,089
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 109 · 2024: 155 · 2023: 149 · 2022: 105 · 2021: 168 · 2020: 135 · 2019: 106 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Compute Canada
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
catastrophic forgetting, dropout, activation functions, continual learning, task relationships, cross-validation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review