CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 803Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesQuantum many-body systems

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Bulk Locality and Quantum Error Correction in AdS/CFT

Open access
Almheiri, Ahmed, Dong, Xi, Harlow, Daniel·2014·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1411.7041arXiv 1411.7041
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We point out a connection between the emergence of bulk locality in AdS/CFT and the theory of quantum error correction. Bulk notions such as Bogoliubov transformations, location in the radial direction, and the holographic entropy bound all have natural CFT interpretations in the language of quantum error correction. We also show that the question of whether bulk operator reconstruction works only in the causal wedge or all the way to the extremal surface is related to the question of whether or not the quantum error correcting code realized by AdS/CFT is also a "quantum secret sharing scheme", and suggest a tensor network calculation that may settle the issue. Interestingly, the version of quantum error correction which is best suited to our analysis is the somewhat nonstandard "operator algebra quantum error correction" of Beny, Kempf, and Kribs. Our proposal gives a precise formulation of the idea of "subregion-subregion" duality in AdS/CFT, and clarifies the limits of its validity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1411.7041

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Assuming the gravitational entropy formula captures the true entropy of the exact state of radiation, these operators are changing this exact state.

    “Assuming that this formula captures the true entropy of the exact state of radiation, this means that these operators are changing this exact state [74, 75], see also [76].”

    From The entropy of Hawking radiation (2021) · cites this paper as [76]

    The paper’s sections 3.2 and 3.5 discuss how operators act on a code subspace, and its discussion of the Ryu–Takayanagi extension concerns entropy of a boundary region. Our copy does not address the exact state of radiation or say that the operators in the citing sentence change that state (searched: radiation, exact state of radiation, and radiation entropy). (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. T. Banks, M.R. Douglas, G.T. Horowitz and E.J. Martinec, AdS dynamics from conformal field theory, hep-th/9808016 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  2. D. Harlow and D. Stanford, Operator dictionaries and wave functions in AdS/CFT and dS/CFT, arXiv:1104.2621 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  3. R. Haag, Local quantum physics: fields, particles, algebras, Springer (1996).
  4. B. Chilian and K. Fredenhagen, The time slice axiom in perturbative quantum field theory on globally hyperbolic spacetimes, Commun. Math. Phys. 287 (2009) 513 [arXiv:0802.1642] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  5. M. Benini, C. Dappiaggi, T.-P. Hack and A. Schenkel, A C * -algebra for quantized principal U(1)-connections on globally hyperbolic Lorentzian manifolds, Commun. Math. Phys. 332 (2014) 477 [arXiv:1307.3052] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  6. A. Hamilton, D.N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz and D.A. Lowe, Holographic representation of local bulk operators, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 066009 [hep-th/0606141] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  7. I.A. Morrison, Boundary-to-bulk maps for AdS causal wedges and the Reeh-Schlieder property in holography, JHEP 05 (2014) 053 [arXiv:1403.3426] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  8. P.W. Shor, Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory, Phys. Rev. A 52 (1995) R2493. · DOI · Paper page
  9. D. Gottesman, Stabilizer codes and quantum error correction, quant-ph/9705052 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  10. R. Bousso, S. Leichenauer and V. Rosenhaus, Light-sheets and AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 046009 [arXiv:1203.6619] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  11. B. Czech, J.L. Karczmarek, F. Nogueira and M. Van Raamsdonk, The gravity dual of a density matrix, Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012) 155009 [arXiv:1204.1330] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  12. R. Bousso, B. Freivogel, S. Leichenauer, V. Rosenhaus and C. Zukowski, Null geodesics, local CFT operators and AdS/CFT for subregions, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 064057 [arXiv:1209.4641] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  13. V.E. Hubeny and M. Rangamani, Causal holographic information, JHEP 06 (2012) 114 [arXiv:1204.1698] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  14. K. Papadodimas and S. Raju, State-dependent bulk-boundary maps and black hole complementarity, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 086010 [arXiv:1310.6335] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  15. D. Harlow, Aspects of the Papadodimas-Raju proposal for the black hole interior, JHEP 11 (2014) 055 [arXiv:1405.1995] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  16. E. Verlinde and H. Verlinde, Black hole entanglement and quantum error correction, JHEP 10 (2013) 107 [arXiv:1211.6913] [INSPIRE]. JHEP04(2015)163 · DOI
  17. I. Heemskerk, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, Bulk and transhorizon measurements in AdS/CFT, JHEP 10 (2012) 165 [arXiv:1201.3664] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  18. D. Kabat, G. Lifschytz and D.A. Lowe, Constructing local bulk observables in interacting AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 106009 [arXiv:1102.2910] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  19. R. Bousso and L. Randall, Holographic domains of Anti-de Sitter space, JHEP 04 (2002) 057 [hep-th/0112080] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  20. K. Papadodimas and S. Raju, An infalling observer in AdS/CFT, JHEP 10 (2013) 212 [arXiv:1211.6767] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  21. M.A. Nielsen and I.L. Chuang, Quantum computation and quantum information, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (2010).
  22. D. Harlow and P. Hayden, Quantum computation vs. firewalls, JHEP 06 (2013) 085 [arXiv:1301.4504] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  23. R. Cleve, D. Gottesman and H.-K. Lo, How to share a quantum secret, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 648 [quant-ph/9901025] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  24. B. Schumacher and M.A. Nielsen, Quantum data processing and error correction, Phys. Rev. A 54 (1996) 2629 [quant-ph/9604022] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  25. D. Harlow, Jerusalem lectures on black holes and quantum information, arXiv:1409.1231 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  26. M. Grassl, T. Beth, and T. Pellizzari, Codes for the quantum erasure channel, Phys. Rev. A 56 (1997) 33 [quant-ph/9610042] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  27. D.N. Page, Average entropy of a subsystem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 1291 [gr-qc/9305007] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  28. M. M. Wolf, F. Verstraete, M. B. Hastings and J.I. Cirac, Area laws in quantum systems: mutual information and correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 070502 [arXiv:0704.3906]. · DOI · Paper page
  29. C. Bény, A. Kempf and D.W. Kribs, Generalization of quantum error correction via the heisenberg picture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 100502 [quant-ph/0608071]. · DOI · Paper page
  30. C. Bény, A. Kempf and D.W. Kribs, Quantum error correction of observables, Phys. Rev. A 76 (2007) 042303 [arXiv:0705.1574]. · DOI · Paper page
  31. A.C. Wall, Maximin surfaces and the strong subadditivity of the covariant holographic entanglement entropy, Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 225007 [arXiv:1211.3494] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  32. M. Headrick, V.E. Hubeny, A. Lawrence and M. Rangamani, Causality & holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 12 (2014) 162 [arXiv:1408.6300] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  33. D.L. Jafferis and S.J. Suh, The gravity duals of modular hamiltonians, arXiv:1412.8465 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  34. T. Faulkner, A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 11 (2013) 074 [arXiv:1307.2892] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  35. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001] [INSPIRE]. JHEP04(2015)163 · DOI · Paper page
  36. I. Heemskerk, J. Penedones, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, Holography from conformal field theory, JHEP 10 (2009) 079 [arXiv:0907.0151] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  37. G. Vidal, Class of quantum many-body states that can be efficiently simulated, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 110501 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  38. B. Swingle, Entanglement renormalization and holography, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 065007 [arXiv:0905.1317] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  39. G. Evenbly and G. Vidal, Tensor network states and geometry, J. Stat. Phys. 145 (2011) 891 [arXiv:1106.1082]. · DOI
  40. I. Heemskerk, Construction of bulk fields with gauge redundancy, JHEP 09 (2012) 106 [arXiv:1201.3666] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  41. D. Kabat and G. Lifschytz, Decoding the hologram: scalar fields interacting with gravity, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 066010 [arXiv:1311.3020] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  42. H. Casini, M. Huerta and J.A. Rosabal, Remarks on entanglement entropy for gauge fields, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 085012 [arXiv:1312.1183] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  43. V.E. Hubeny, Extremal surfaces as bulk probes in AdS/CFT, JHEP 07 (2012) 093 [arXiv:1203.1044] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  44. D.D. Blanco, H. Casini, L.-Y. Hung and R.C. Myers, Relative entropy and holography, JHEP 08 (2013) 060 [arXiv:1305.3182] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  45. L. Susskind and E. Witten, The holographic bound in Anti-de Sitter space, hep-th/9805114 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  46. L. Susskind, The world as a hologram, J. Math. Phys. 36 (1995) 6377 [hep-th/9409089] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  47. S. Leichenauer and V. Rosenhaus, AdS black holes, the bulk-boundary dictionary and smearing functions, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 026003 [arXiv:1304.6821] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  48. S.-J. Rey and V. Rosenhaus, Scanning tunneling macroscopy, black holes and AdS/CFT bulk locality, JHEP 07 (2014) 050 [arXiv:1403.3943] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  49. B.D. Chowdhury and M.K. Parikh, When UV and IR collide: inequivalent CFTs from different foliations of AdS, arXiv:1407.4467 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Almheiri, A., Dong, X., & Harlow, D.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Dong, Xi
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2014
Volume
2015
Issue
4
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1411.7041
arXiv
1411.7041
OpenAlex
W2098838878
Cited by
803
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 107 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 20
FWCI
28.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (0756174)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
bulk locality, quantum error correction, AdS/CFT correspondence, holographic entropy bound, Bogoliubov transformation, quantum secret sharing, tensor networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review